Beyond “paper parks”: integrating marine fauna into Brazilian protected area management

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Helio H. Checon , Beatriz P. Cunha , Yasmina Shah Esmaeili , A. Cecília Z. Amaral , Omar Defeo , Guilherme N. Corte
{"title":"Beyond “paper parks”: integrating marine fauna into Brazilian protected area management","authors":"Helio H. Checon ,&nbsp;Beatriz P. Cunha ,&nbsp;Yasmina Shah Esmaeili ,&nbsp;A. Cecília Z. Amaral ,&nbsp;Omar Defeo ,&nbsp;Guilherme N. Corte","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protected Areas (PAs) are crucial for preserving species, promoting sustainability, and meeting global agreement targets. However, their effectiveness may be compromised by insufficient inclusion of biodiversity in their management plans. This study assessed the extent to which marine fauna is incorporated into the management plans of Brazilian coastal and marine PAs. We reviewed 144 Brazilian PAs and found that only 82 (57 %) have management plans. Of these, the majority (61 %) are designated as sustainable use areas, where resource extraction and human occupation are permitted, rather than no-take zones offering stricter protection. Our analysis revealed a predominant focus on terrestrial vertebrates, while marine diversity is often limited to a few economically important species. Key ecological groups, such as marine invertebrates, are largely overlooked in all sections of management plans (i.e., assessment, zoning, and planning). These gaps may result in ineffective conservation outcomes due to ad hoc decision-making, conflicting land uses, and poor alignment with biodiversity objectives. To enhance the ecological effectiveness of Brazil's coastal and marine PAs, management plans must be developed for all existing PAs and revised to explicitly incorporate local marine biodiversity into the assessment and development of management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 107759"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125002212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected Areas (PAs) are crucial for preserving species, promoting sustainability, and meeting global agreement targets. However, their effectiveness may be compromised by insufficient inclusion of biodiversity in their management plans. This study assessed the extent to which marine fauna is incorporated into the management plans of Brazilian coastal and marine PAs. We reviewed 144 Brazilian PAs and found that only 82 (57 %) have management plans. Of these, the majority (61 %) are designated as sustainable use areas, where resource extraction and human occupation are permitted, rather than no-take zones offering stricter protection. Our analysis revealed a predominant focus on terrestrial vertebrates, while marine diversity is often limited to a few economically important species. Key ecological groups, such as marine invertebrates, are largely overlooked in all sections of management plans (i.e., assessment, zoning, and planning). These gaps may result in ineffective conservation outcomes due to ad hoc decision-making, conflicting land uses, and poor alignment with biodiversity objectives. To enhance the ecological effectiveness of Brazil's coastal and marine PAs, management plans must be developed for all existing PAs and revised to explicitly incorporate local marine biodiversity into the assessment and development of management strategies.
超越“纸面公园”:将海洋动物纳入巴西保护区管理
保护区对于保护物种、促进可持续性和实现全球协议目标至关重要。然而,由于管理计划中没有充分纳入生物多样性,其有效性可能受到损害。这项研究评估了将海洋动物纳入巴西沿海和海洋保护区管理计划的程度。我们回顾了144家巴西PAs,发现只有82家(57%)有管理计划。其中,大多数(61%)被指定为可持续利用区,允许资源开采和人类居住,而不是提供更严格保护的禁猎区。我们的分析显示,主要集中在陆地脊椎动物,而海洋多样性往往仅限于少数经济上重要的物种。关键的生态类群,如海洋无脊椎动物,在管理计划的所有部分(即评估、分区和规划)中基本上被忽视。由于临时决策、冲突的土地利用以及与生物多样性目标的不一致,这些差距可能导致无效的保护结果。为了提高巴西沿海和海洋保护区的生态效益,必须为所有现有保护区制定管理计划,并对其进行修订,明确将当地海洋生物多样性纳入管理战略的评估和制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信