A Spoonful of Heart Failure Resources Helps the Medicine Units Readmission Rates Go Down

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph Armitage (he/him/his) MSN, RN, CHFN, Melissa Wenzel BSN, RN, CCRN, Kathryn Arkin RN, BSN, Corrine Benacka MSN, CCRN, Jane Wilcox MD
{"title":"A Spoonful of Heart Failure Resources Helps the Medicine Units Readmission Rates Go Down","authors":"Joseph Armitage (he/him/his) MSN, RN, CHFN,&nbsp;Melissa Wenzel BSN, RN, CCRN,&nbsp;Kathryn Arkin RN, BSN,&nbsp;Corrine Benacka MSN, CCRN,&nbsp;Jane Wilcox MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States and is associated with increased mortality, imposed stress on patients, and financial/capacity burdens on health care systems (AHA, 2022).</div><div>Medicine units were experiencing 30-day heart failure readmission rates above the hospital benchmark of 15.8%. Medicine units had higher rates of readmissions than the cardiac units for the heart failure population. A gap analysis found these units were lacking evidence-based strategies for patients admitted with heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The performance improvement project aimed to evaluate effectiveness of specific interventions designed to reduce heart failure 30-day readmission rates on non-cardiac medicine units. The goal was to reduce readmissions in these areas through implementing the Heart Failure Bundle; a series of targeted strategies that includes patient education, scheduling follow up appointments within 7-10 days prior to discharge, providing scales and post discharge callbacks.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Population</h3><div>The medicine units in a large, urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. The population included adults with heart failure admitted inpatient or observation regardless of diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Method/Process</h3><div>The heart failure team met with the medicine nursing and physician leadership division to share readmission data and analyze root causes for heart failure re-admissions. A full-time heart failure nurse navigator was dedicated to the medicine units to assist in implementation of the bundle. The navigator met with each unit, identified unit specific needs, attended interdisciplinary rounds and quality meetings, and educated staff members. The navigator began meeting with patients to provide comprehensive heart failure education and issue home scales, escalating care to specialized Cardiology services when indicated, and coordinating transitions of care.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome Measures</h3><div>The hospital's benchmark for heart failure readmissions is 15.8%. All cause, unplanned 30-day heart failure readmissions were measured pre and post intervention. On the pilot unit, heart failure readmissions were reduced from a pre-intervention 6-month average of 21.2% to a post intervention 6-month average of 10.6%.</div><div>The pre-intervention 6-month average of the remaining units was 21.46%. Five months post intervention, the remaining units showed a decrease in average readmission rate to 12.3%.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>The team identified that heart failure readmissions occurring in non-cardiac areas were not meeting benchmark and having an overall impact on the hospital's readmission rate.</div><div>Designating a heart failure navigator to execute the evidence-based bundle that proved successful on cardiac units could also be implemented on medicine units. Allocating described resources to these non-cardiac units and identifying process gaps helped the team focus interventions and address the needs of heart failure patients regardless of location throughout the hospital.</div><div>Identifying variations in heart failure management for inpatients and allocating resources to non-cardiac areas allowed the team to focus efforts in a targeted and meaningful way. These efforts have shown to improve 30-day readmissions and positively impact the heart failure population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 103-104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956325000767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States and is associated with increased mortality, imposed stress on patients, and financial/capacity burdens on health care systems (AHA, 2022).
Medicine units were experiencing 30-day heart failure readmission rates above the hospital benchmark of 15.8%. Medicine units had higher rates of readmissions than the cardiac units for the heart failure population. A gap analysis found these units were lacking evidence-based strategies for patients admitted with heart failure.

Purpose

The performance improvement project aimed to evaluate effectiveness of specific interventions designed to reduce heart failure 30-day readmission rates on non-cardiac medicine units. The goal was to reduce readmissions in these areas through implementing the Heart Failure Bundle; a series of targeted strategies that includes patient education, scheduling follow up appointments within 7-10 days prior to discharge, providing scales and post discharge callbacks.

Setting/Population

The medicine units in a large, urban academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois. The population included adults with heart failure admitted inpatient or observation regardless of diagnosis.

Method/Process

The heart failure team met with the medicine nursing and physician leadership division to share readmission data and analyze root causes for heart failure re-admissions. A full-time heart failure nurse navigator was dedicated to the medicine units to assist in implementation of the bundle. The navigator met with each unit, identified unit specific needs, attended interdisciplinary rounds and quality meetings, and educated staff members. The navigator began meeting with patients to provide comprehensive heart failure education and issue home scales, escalating care to specialized Cardiology services when indicated, and coordinating transitions of care.

Outcome Measures

The hospital's benchmark for heart failure readmissions is 15.8%. All cause, unplanned 30-day heart failure readmissions were measured pre and post intervention. On the pilot unit, heart failure readmissions were reduced from a pre-intervention 6-month average of 21.2% to a post intervention 6-month average of 10.6%.
The pre-intervention 6-month average of the remaining units was 21.46%. Five months post intervention, the remaining units showed a decrease in average readmission rate to 12.3%.

Practical Implications

The team identified that heart failure readmissions occurring in non-cardiac areas were not meeting benchmark and having an overall impact on the hospital's readmission rate.
Designating a heart failure navigator to execute the evidence-based bundle that proved successful on cardiac units could also be implemented on medicine units. Allocating described resources to these non-cardiac units and identifying process gaps helped the team focus interventions and address the needs of heart failure patients regardless of location throughout the hospital.
Identifying variations in heart failure management for inpatients and allocating resources to non-cardiac areas allowed the team to focus efforts in a targeted and meaningful way. These efforts have shown to improve 30-day readmissions and positively impact the heart failure population.
一勺心力衰竭资源帮助医学单位再入院率下降
背景:心力衰竭是美国住院的主要原因,并与死亡率增加、患者压力增加以及医疗保健系统的财政/能力负担相关(AHA, 2022)。医学单位的30天心力衰竭再入院率高于医院基准的15.8%。在心力衰竭人群中,医学单位的再入院率高于心脏单位。一项差距分析发现,这些单位缺乏针对心力衰竭患者的循证策略。目的:绩效改进项目旨在评估旨在降低非心脏医学单位心力衰竭30天再入院率的特定干预措施的有效性。目标是通过实施心力衰竭包减少这些地区的再入院;一系列有针对性的策略,包括患者教育,出院前7-10天内安排随访预约,提供量表和出院后回访。环境/人口伊利诺伊州芝加哥市一个大型城市学术医疗中心的医学单位。研究对象包括住院或观察的心力衰竭患者,无论诊断如何。方法/流程心衰团队与医学护理和医师领导部门会面,分享再入院数据,分析心衰再入院的根本原因。一名全职的心力衰竭护士领航员专门为医疗单位协助实施捆绑包。导航员会见了每个单位,确定了单位的具体需求,参加了跨学科的轮次和质量会议,并教育了工作人员。导航员开始与患者会面,提供全面的心力衰竭教育,发放家庭量表,在需要时将护理升级到专门的心脏病学服务,并协调护理的过渡。该医院心力衰竭再入院的基准率为15.8%。在干预前后测量所有原因、计划外的30天心力衰竭再入院率。在试点单位,心力衰竭再入院率从干预前6个月的平均21.2%降至干预后6个月的平均10.6%。其余单位干预前6个月平均为21.46%。干预5个月后,其余单位的平均再入院率下降至12.3%。实际意义研究小组发现,发生在非心脏区域的心力衰竭再入院率未达到基准,并对医院的再入院率产生总体影响。指定心力衰竭导航员来执行在心脏单位证明成功的循证捆绑也可以在医学单位实施。将所描述的资源分配到这些非心脏单位,并确定流程差距,有助于团队集中干预措施,并解决心力衰竭患者的需求,而不考虑整个医院的位置。确定住院患者心力衰竭管理的变化,并将资源分配到非心脏领域,使团队能够以有针对性和有意义的方式集中精力。这些努力已被证明可以改善30天再入院率,并对心力衰竭患者产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信