Risk and protective factors that distinguish United States veterans with a history of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
David P. Cenkner, Alyson K. Zalta
{"title":"Risk and protective factors that distinguish United States veterans with a history of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt","authors":"David P. Cenkner,&nbsp;Alyson K. Zalta","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.05.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among United States veterans are known. However, factors differentiating veterans who endorse suicidal ideation to veterans who engage in suicide attempts are understudied. The current study examined factors that distinguished these two groups using the Military Health and Well-Being Project, an online dataset of 1495 veterans that oversampled for female and Black veterans. Veterans (<em>N</em> = 620; 39 % female; 15 % Black) were grouped by those who endorsed a history of suicidal thoughts (<em>n</em> = 548) or suicide attempts (<em>n</em> = 72). Independent samples <em>t</em>-tests were conducted to examine differences in individual risk and protective factors. A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine which factors uniquely distinguished between veterans with past ideation and veterans with past attempts. Compared to veterans with past ideation, those with past attempts had higher scores on moral injury (<em>d</em> = −0.80; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), substance use (<em>d</em> = −0.72; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), and loneliness (<em>d</em> = −0.62; <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and lower scores on meaning and purpose in life (<em>d</em> = 0.89; <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and social support (<em>d</em> = 0.61; <em>p</em> &lt; .001). When collectively examined, female gender (OR = 2.37), endorsing lower meaning and purpose in life (OR = 0.55) and endorsing greater substance use (OR = 1.81) were unique predictors of attempting suicide. Findings suggest the importance of assessing and targeting meaning and purpose in life and substance use in veterans endorsing suicidal ideation to potentially prevent the transition to attempting suicide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Pages 126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among United States veterans are known. However, factors differentiating veterans who endorse suicidal ideation to veterans who engage in suicide attempts are understudied. The current study examined factors that distinguished these two groups using the Military Health and Well-Being Project, an online dataset of 1495 veterans that oversampled for female and Black veterans. Veterans (N = 620; 39 % female; 15 % Black) were grouped by those who endorsed a history of suicidal thoughts (n = 548) or suicide attempts (n = 72). Independent samples t-tests were conducted to examine differences in individual risk and protective factors. A binary logistic regression was conducted to examine which factors uniquely distinguished between veterans with past ideation and veterans with past attempts. Compared to veterans with past ideation, those with past attempts had higher scores on moral injury (d = −0.80; p < .001), substance use (d = −0.72; p < .001), and loneliness (d = −0.62; p < .001) and lower scores on meaning and purpose in life (d = 0.89; p < .001) and social support (d = 0.61; p < .001). When collectively examined, female gender (OR = 2.37), endorsing lower meaning and purpose in life (OR = 0.55) and endorsing greater substance use (OR = 1.81) were unique predictors of attempting suicide. Findings suggest the importance of assessing and targeting meaning and purpose in life and substance use in veterans endorsing suicidal ideation to potentially prevent the transition to attempting suicide.
区分有自杀意念和自杀企图史的美国退伍军人的风险和保护因素
美国退伍军人自杀想法和行为的许多风险和保护因素是已知的。然而,区分支持自杀想法的退伍军人和从事自杀企图的退伍军人的因素还没有得到充分的研究。目前的研究使用了军事健康和福利项目来检查区分这两个群体的因素,这是一个1495名退伍军人的在线数据集,对女性和黑人退伍军人进行了抽样调查。退伍军人(N = 620;女性占39%;15%为黑人),根据有自杀念头(548人)或有自杀企图(72人)的人进行分组。进行了独立样本t检验,以检查个体风险和保护因素的差异。采用二元logistic回归分析,探讨有“过去思想”的退伍军人与有“过去企图”的退伍军人之间的差异。与有前科的退伍军人相比,有前科的退伍军人在道德伤害方面得分更高(d = - 0.80;p & lt;.001),物质使用(d = - 0.72;p & lt;.001),孤独(d = - 0.62;p & lt;.001),生活意义和目的得分较低(d = 0.89;p & lt;.001)和社会支持(d = 0.61;p & lt;措施)。当集体调查时,女性性别(OR = 2.37)、认同较低的生活意义和目的(OR = 0.55)和认同较多的物质使用(OR = 1.81)是企图自杀的独特预测因素。研究结果表明,评估和瞄准退伍军人的生活意义和目的以及支持自杀意念的物质使用的重要性,以潜在地防止过渡到企图自杀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信