The tug of war: will regulatory quality and green innovation outpace carbon emissions?

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Raphael Ampedu , Xiongyuan Wang , Kihumuro Jotham , Richmond Mensah
{"title":"The tug of war: will regulatory quality and green innovation outpace carbon emissions?","authors":"Raphael Ampedu ,&nbsp;Xiongyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Kihumuro Jotham ,&nbsp;Richmond Mensah","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study investigates the effects of regulatory quality, green innovation, and their interaction on carbon emissions in 13 Asian countries from 1991 to 2022. The factors influencing emissions reduction in the region are investigated using PMG, GEE, Quantile regression, Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE), and Two Step System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for robustness. The study considers the dual effect of regulatory quality and green technology in mitigating emissions and the social and economic factors of urbanization, foreign direct investment (FDI), and education level. We find that regulatory quality has a significant disincentive effect on carbon emissions. It highlights why strong governance frameworks matter for the promotion of environmental sustainability. green innovation significantly reduces carbon emissions highlighting its importance in long-term decarbonization strategies. Beyond that, GreInn*RegQ increases emissions reductions further, illustrating the need for policy soundness and coherence. Nevertheless, these factors have different effects across emissions quantiles, and high-emission economies are more likely to benefit from regulatory quality and green innovation synergies. For example, control variables like urbanization are positively related to emissions, while FDI helps decrease emissions by allowing clean technology to be transferred. The findings provide policymakers with actionable insights, stressing the need for context-specific, tailored strategies to ensure sustainable development and meet global climate goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 2","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates the effects of regulatory quality, green innovation, and their interaction on carbon emissions in 13 Asian countries from 1991 to 2022. The factors influencing emissions reduction in the region are investigated using PMG, GEE, Quantile regression, Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE), and Two Step System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for robustness. The study considers the dual effect of regulatory quality and green technology in mitigating emissions and the social and economic factors of urbanization, foreign direct investment (FDI), and education level. We find that regulatory quality has a significant disincentive effect on carbon emissions. It highlights why strong governance frameworks matter for the promotion of environmental sustainability. green innovation significantly reduces carbon emissions highlighting its importance in long-term decarbonization strategies. Beyond that, GreInn*RegQ increases emissions reductions further, illustrating the need for policy soundness and coherence. Nevertheless, these factors have different effects across emissions quantiles, and high-emission economies are more likely to benefit from regulatory quality and green innovation synergies. For example, control variables like urbanization are positively related to emissions, while FDI helps decrease emissions by allowing clean technology to be transferred. The findings provide policymakers with actionable insights, stressing the need for context-specific, tailored strategies to ensure sustainable development and meet global climate goals.
这场拉锯战:监管质量和绿色创新是否会超过碳排放?
研究考察了1991 - 2022年13个亚洲国家监管质量、绿色创新及其相互作用对碳排放的影响。采用PMG、GEE、分位数回归、面板校正标准误差(PCSE)和两步系统广义矩量法(GMM)对影响区域减排的因素进行了鲁棒性研究。该研究考虑了监管质量和绿色技术在减排中的双重作用,以及城市化、外国直接投资(FDI)和教育水平等社会经济因素。研究发现,监管质量对碳排放具有显著的抑制作用。它强调了为什么强有力的治理框架对促进环境可持续性至关重要。绿色创新显著减少了碳排放,突出了其在长期脱碳战略中的重要性。除此之外,green *RegQ还进一步增加了减排,说明了政策健全和连贯的必要性。然而,这些因素对不同排放分位数的影响不同,高排放经济体更有可能从监管质量和绿色创新协同效应中受益。例如,城市化等控制变量与排放呈正相关,而外国直接投资通过允许转让清洁技术有助于减少排放。研究结果为政策制定者提供了可行的见解,强调需要根据具体情况制定量身定制的战略,以确保可持续发展和实现全球气候目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信