Single vs triple injections of platelet-rich plasma in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study of 80 patients

Ülkü Dönmez , Onur Engin
{"title":"Single vs triple injections of platelet-rich plasma in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective cohort study of 80 patients","authors":"Ülkü Dönmez ,&nbsp;Onur Engin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disorder that significantly impairs quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising treatment option for managing symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study is to compare the effects of triple versus single PRP injections on pain and quality of life in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The files of 40 patients who received a single dose of PRP and 40 patients who received three doses of PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis were retrospectively examined. Patients had been evaluated before the treatment and at their 6 month follow up with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the 6-month examinations, there was a statistically significant decrease in the WOMAC total (single, from 64.7 ± 13.2 to 54.4 ± 17.2, <em>P</em> = .001; triple, from 67.0 ± 14.7 to 45.4 ± 19.2, <em>P</em> = .001), and VAS scores (single, from 7.1 ± 1.0 to 5.10 ± 2.0, <em>P</em> = .002; and triple, from 7.3 ± 1.0 to 3.7 ± 2.2, <em>P</em> = .001) of both the single and triple injection groups compared to the baseline. WOMAC total (<em>P</em> = .03) and VAS scores (<em>P</em> = .006) of the triple injection group were significantly better but there was no significant difference in WOMAC pain (<em>P</em> = .06), WOMAC physical (<em>P</em> = .06) and WOMAC stiffness (0.08) subscales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This research revealed that triple PRP injections are more effective than single injections at improving functional outcomes. Furthermore, the potential to alleviate pain may be greater with multiple injections; however, this effect was not consistently observed across all pain evaluation metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254524000684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disorder that significantly impairs quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising treatment option for managing symptoms of knee osteoarthritis.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of triple versus single PRP injections on pain and quality of life in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

The files of 40 patients who received a single dose of PRP and 40 patients who received three doses of PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis were retrospectively examined. Patients had been evaluated before the treatment and at their 6 month follow up with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index.

Results

At the 6-month examinations, there was a statistically significant decrease in the WOMAC total (single, from 64.7 ± 13.2 to 54.4 ± 17.2, P = .001; triple, from 67.0 ± 14.7 to 45.4 ± 19.2, P = .001), and VAS scores (single, from 7.1 ± 1.0 to 5.10 ± 2.0, P = .002; and triple, from 7.3 ± 1.0 to 3.7 ± 2.2, P = .001) of both the single and triple injection groups compared to the baseline. WOMAC total (P = .03) and VAS scores (P = .006) of the triple injection group were significantly better but there was no significant difference in WOMAC pain (P = .06), WOMAC physical (P = .06) and WOMAC stiffness (0.08) subscales.

Conclusions

This research revealed that triple PRP injections are more effective than single injections at improving functional outcomes. Furthermore, the potential to alleviate pain may be greater with multiple injections; however, this effect was not consistently observed across all pain evaluation metrics.
膝骨关节炎患者单次与三次富血小板血浆注射:一项80例患者的回顾性队列研究
骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的退行性关节疾病,严重影响生活质量。富血小板血浆(PRP)已成为治疗膝骨关节炎症状的一种有希望的治疗选择。本研究的目的是比较三联PRP注射与单次PRP注射对膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析40例单剂量PRP和40例三剂量PRP治疗膝骨性关节炎患者的临床资料。患者在治疗前和随访6个月时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)骨关节炎指数进行评估。结果6个月检查时,患者WOMAC总分(单)由64.7±13.2降至54.4±17.2,P = .001;三,从67.0±14.7,45.4±19.2,P =措施),脉管分数(单身,从7.1±1.0,5.10±2.0,P = .002;与基线相比,单、三联注射组从7.3±1.0降至3.7±2.2,P = 0.001)。三次注射组的WOMAC总分(P = 0.03)和VAS评分(P = 0.006)明显优于对照组,但在WOMAC疼痛(P = 0.06)、WOMAC物理(P = 0.06)和WOMAC僵硬(0.08)亚量表上差异无统计学意义。结论三次PRP注射比单次PRP注射在改善功能预后方面更有效。此外,多次注射可能更有可能减轻疼痛;然而,这种效应并不是在所有疼痛评估指标中一致观察到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信