J. Artell , A. Juutinen , J. Kostensalo , T. Lankia , E. Pouta , H. Ahtiainen , A. Tolvanen
{"title":"European water recreation values — A systematic review and meta-analysis of travel cost studies published between 2000–2021","authors":"J. Artell , A. Juutinen , J. Kostensalo , T. Lankia , E. Pouta , H. Ahtiainen , A. Tolvanen","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2025.100899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>European surface waters provide a wide variety of opportunities for outdoor recreation. Also, the economic value of the waters has been extensively studied over the last few decades. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the European water recreation that examined the travel cost valuation studies published between 2000 and 2021. Following the well-established PRISMA guidelines, we found 40 separate studies with a total of 85 consumer surplus estimates based on data from over 113,000 persons. The data were analysed using 1) a multilevel random-effects model for estimating the average consumer surplus of a trip and 2) a meta-regression model with publication year, region, GDP per capita, multi-day trips and the type of recreation were included as covariates. The potential presence of publication bias was tested using Eggert's test. Studies on multiday trips and a variety of water recreation activities were observed to provide larger value estimates than studies focusing on specific single-day activities. In-water activities, such as boating, were more highly valued than activities in the vicinity of water, such as recreational activities on a beach. The average consumer surplus (CS) per trip was €158 (95 % C.I. [€107, €232]) in year 2019 PPP-corrected EU-27-country euros. No statistically significant differences in consumer surplus were found across regions. The average CS was also not found to have changed over the study period adjusted for inflation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100899"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078025000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
European surface waters provide a wide variety of opportunities for outdoor recreation. Also, the economic value of the waters has been extensively studied over the last few decades. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the European water recreation that examined the travel cost valuation studies published between 2000 and 2021. Following the well-established PRISMA guidelines, we found 40 separate studies with a total of 85 consumer surplus estimates based on data from over 113,000 persons. The data were analysed using 1) a multilevel random-effects model for estimating the average consumer surplus of a trip and 2) a meta-regression model with publication year, region, GDP per capita, multi-day trips and the type of recreation were included as covariates. The potential presence of publication bias was tested using Eggert's test. Studies on multiday trips and a variety of water recreation activities were observed to provide larger value estimates than studies focusing on specific single-day activities. In-water activities, such as boating, were more highly valued than activities in the vicinity of water, such as recreational activities on a beach. The average consumer surplus (CS) per trip was €158 (95 % C.I. [€107, €232]) in year 2019 PPP-corrected EU-27-country euros. No statistically significant differences in consumer surplus were found across regions. The average CS was also not found to have changed over the study period adjusted for inflation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.