Empirical assessment of cultural safety within Australian hospitals highlights the impact of access to Aboriginal hospital liaison officers on the experiences of Aboriginal patients

Elissa Elvidge , Steven L. Taylor , Kiara Harvey , Yeena Thompson , Jessica Armao , Geraint B. Rogers , Amy Creighton , Yin Paradies
{"title":"Empirical assessment of cultural safety within Australian hospitals highlights the impact of access to Aboriginal hospital liaison officers on the experiences of Aboriginal patients","authors":"Elissa Elvidge ,&nbsp;Steven L. Taylor ,&nbsp;Kiara Harvey ,&nbsp;Yeena Thompson ,&nbsp;Jessica Armao ,&nbsp;Geraint B. Rogers ,&nbsp;Amy Creighton ,&nbsp;Yin Paradies","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Ensuring access to hospital services that are culturally safe is imperative for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes. Addressing failings within existing services relies on the ability to prioritise areas for improvement in a methodologically robust manner that reflects the experiences of Indigenous service users. The construct and content validity of the Cultural Safety Survey, a mixed-methods questionnaire-based tool that captures the lived experiences of First Nations peoples attending hospital, was previously established. This study aimed to identify hospital and participant characteristics associated with positive or negative experiences of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Study sites included 49 hospitals in New South Wales, either through direct engagement with the hospital or opportunistic participant recruitment. A total of 413 participants took part in the study; 307 completed the whole survey and 298 of them had complete hospital and demographic data for analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to identify contributors to composite and domain-specific cultural safety scores. Assessed variables included respondent age, gender, distance travelled, attendance capacity (patient or visitor), hospital size, remoteness and socioeconomic status of location. Additional analysis assessing reported interaction with an Aboriginal hospital liaison officer (AHLO) on cultural safety scores was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>Of 413 participants, 298 provided complete demographic and hospital data, and confirmed informed consent. Responses related to 49 separate hospitals in New South Wales. Participant age and level of interaction with an AHLO showed a consistently positive association with cultural safety score. A unit increase in age was associated with 51.3% increased odds of a higher overall cultural safety score (<em>P</em> = .0012). Similarly, each unit increase in AHLO interaction was associated with 89.3% greater likelihood of a higher cultural safety score (<em>P</em> = .0031). Other variables – including higher socioeconomic advantage, female gender, and a shorter distance travelled – were positively associated with specific cultural safety domains. Respondent comments captured in the free text component of the questionnaire were consistent with quantitative findings.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the importance of access to an AHLO when visiting hospital. More generally, the ability to quantify the performance of hospital services based on the experiences of Indigenous end-users, and to identify factors that contribute to the nature of those interactions, provides a potential guide for impactful service reform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Ensuring access to hospital services that are culturally safe is imperative for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes. Addressing failings within existing services relies on the ability to prioritise areas for improvement in a methodologically robust manner that reflects the experiences of Indigenous service users. The construct and content validity of the Cultural Safety Survey, a mixed-methods questionnaire-based tool that captures the lived experiences of First Nations peoples attending hospital, was previously established. This study aimed to identify hospital and participant characteristics associated with positive or negative experiences of care.

Methods

Study sites included 49 hospitals in New South Wales, either through direct engagement with the hospital or opportunistic participant recruitment. A total of 413 participants took part in the study; 307 completed the whole survey and 298 of them had complete hospital and demographic data for analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to identify contributors to composite and domain-specific cultural safety scores. Assessed variables included respondent age, gender, distance travelled, attendance capacity (patient or visitor), hospital size, remoteness and socioeconomic status of location. Additional analysis assessing reported interaction with an Aboriginal hospital liaison officer (AHLO) on cultural safety scores was also performed.

Main findings

Of 413 participants, 298 provided complete demographic and hospital data, and confirmed informed consent. Responses related to 49 separate hospitals in New South Wales. Participant age and level of interaction with an AHLO showed a consistently positive association with cultural safety score. A unit increase in age was associated with 51.3% increased odds of a higher overall cultural safety score (P = .0012). Similarly, each unit increase in AHLO interaction was associated with 89.3% greater likelihood of a higher cultural safety score (P = .0031). Other variables – including higher socioeconomic advantage, female gender, and a shorter distance travelled – were positively associated with specific cultural safety domains. Respondent comments captured in the free text component of the questionnaire were consistent with quantitative findings.

Principal conclusions

The findings highlight the importance of access to an AHLO when visiting hospital. More generally, the ability to quantify the performance of hospital services based on the experiences of Indigenous end-users, and to identify factors that contribute to the nature of those interactions, provides a potential guide for impactful service reform.
对澳大利亚医院内文化安全的实证评估强调了接触土著医院联络官对土著病人经历的影响
目的确保获得文化上安全的医院服务是改善土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康结果的必要条件。解决现有服务中的缺陷取决于能否以反映土著服务使用者经验的方法强有力的方式确定需要改进的领域的优先次序。文化安全调查是一种以问卷为基础的混合方法工具,记录了第一民族住院患者的生活经历,其结构和内容有效性是先前建立的。本研究旨在确定医院和参与者与积极或消极护理经验相关的特征。研究地点包括新南威尔士州的49家医院,通过直接与医院接触或机会性招募参与者。共有413名参与者参加了这项研究;307人完成了全部调查,其中298人有完整的医院和人口统计资料供分析。使用多变量有序逻辑回归来确定复合和特定领域文化安全得分的贡献者。评估的变量包括被调查者的年龄、性别、旅行距离、就诊能力(病人或访客)、医院规模、偏远程度和所在地的社会经济地位。还进行了其他分析,评估报告的与土著医院联络官(AHLO)在文化安全评分方面的相互作用。在413名参与者中,298名提供了完整的人口统计和医院数据,并确认知情同意。答复涉及新南威尔士州49家独立医院。参与者的年龄和与AHLO的互动水平与文化安全得分呈一致的正相关。年龄单位增加与总体文化安全评分增加51.3%的几率相关(P = 0.0012)。同样,AHLO相互作用每增加一个单位,较高文化安全评分的可能性增加89.3% (P = 0.0031)。其他变量——包括较高的社会经济优势、女性性别和较短的旅行距离——与特定的文化安全领域呈正相关。在问卷的自由文本部分中捕获的受访者评论与定量调查结果一致。主要结论研究结果强调了访问医院时获得AHLO的重要性。更一般地说,能够根据土著最终用户的经验量化医院服务的绩效,并确定促成这些相互作用性质的因素,为有效的服务改革提供了潜在的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信