Delineation of groundwater critical zones by integrating GIS and MCDM techniques in the arid region of Sirjan, southeastern Iran

IF 4.9 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Adnan Sadeghi-Lari , Fatemeh Karimi Moqbeli , Mohammad Faryabi
{"title":"Delineation of groundwater critical zones by integrating GIS and MCDM techniques in the arid region of Sirjan, southeastern Iran","authors":"Adnan Sadeghi-Lari ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Karimi Moqbeli ,&nbsp;Mohammad Faryabi","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In arid regions, the overexploitation of groundwater (GW) has led to the degradation of aquifers. To address this issue, identifying GW critical zones (GWCZs) is more crucial than identifying GW potential zones. This paper delineates GWCZs in the Sirjan district by integrating geographic information system (GIS) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Two scientific MCDM models, including the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-influencing factors (MIF), were employed to create a GWCZs map. Within the GIS platform, the field data were applied to create, classify, and assign weights to thematic layers of Annual GW discharge (AGD), water well density (WWD), aquifer recharge (AR), aquifer lithology (AL), aquifer thickness (AT), and GW quality change (GQC). Subsequently, the GWCZs map was generated by applying the overlay weighted-sum method to the six different layers. Using AHP, 10.04, 23.62, 32.8, and 33.54 %; and using MIF, 10.13, 23.36, 40.59, and 25.92 % of the study area were classified into critical, sub-critical, semi-balanced, and balanced zones, respectively. The regression analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) techniques were utilized to assess the reliability of the models. The comparison revealed that both models have acceptable results. However, the MIF method, with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.88 and Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.83, was more reliable than the AHP method, with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.86 and AUC of 0.81. The findings of this research can provide valuable assistance for local and government authorities to ensure the sustainable management and development of GW resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X25000670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In arid regions, the overexploitation of groundwater (GW) has led to the degradation of aquifers. To address this issue, identifying GW critical zones (GWCZs) is more crucial than identifying GW potential zones. This paper delineates GWCZs in the Sirjan district by integrating geographic information system (GIS) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Two scientific MCDM models, including the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-influencing factors (MIF), were employed to create a GWCZs map. Within the GIS platform, the field data were applied to create, classify, and assign weights to thematic layers of Annual GW discharge (AGD), water well density (WWD), aquifer recharge (AR), aquifer lithology (AL), aquifer thickness (AT), and GW quality change (GQC). Subsequently, the GWCZs map was generated by applying the overlay weighted-sum method to the six different layers. Using AHP, 10.04, 23.62, 32.8, and 33.54 %; and using MIF, 10.13, 23.36, 40.59, and 25.92 % of the study area were classified into critical, sub-critical, semi-balanced, and balanced zones, respectively. The regression analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) techniques were utilized to assess the reliability of the models. The comparison revealed that both models have acceptable results. However, the MIF method, with an R2 of 0.88 and Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.83, was more reliable than the AHP method, with an R2 of 0.86 and AUC of 0.81. The findings of this research can provide valuable assistance for local and government authorities to ensure the sustainable management and development of GW resources.
利用GIS和MCDM技术在伊朗东南部锡尔詹干旱区划定地下水临界带
在干旱区,地下水的过度开采导致了含水层的退化。为了解决这个问题,确定GW关键区域(gwcz)比确定GW潜在区域更为重要。本文采用地理信息系统(GIS)和多准则决策(MCDM)相结合的方法对锡尔詹地区的gwcz进行了划分。采用层次分析法(AHP)和多影响因子法(MIF)两种科学的MCDM模型构建了gwcz图。在GIS平台内,应用现场数据创建、分类和分配GW年流量(AGD)、水井密度(WWD)、含水层补给(AR)、含水层岩性(AL)、含水层厚度(AT)和GW质量变化(GQC)主题层的权重。随后,对6个不同的图层应用叠加加权和方法生成gwcz地图。采用层次分析法,分别为10.04、23.62、32.8%、33.54%;MIF将10.13%、23.36%、40.59%和25.92%的研究区划分为临界区、亚临界区、半平衡区和平衡区。采用回归分析和受试者工作曲线(ROC)技术评估模型的可靠性。比较表明,两种模型都有较好的结果。而MIF法的R2为0.88,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.83,比AHP法的R2为0.86,AUC为0.81更可靠。本研究结果可为地方和政府部门确保GW资源的可持续管理和开发提供有价值的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
Groundwater for Sustainable Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
10.20%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信