Cannabis consumption patterns, adverse events, and cannabis risk beliefs: A latent profile analysis in WA State

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sharon B. Garrett , Jason R. Williams , Beatriz H. Carlini , David Hammond
{"title":"Cannabis consumption patterns, adverse events, and cannabis risk beliefs: A latent profile analysis in WA State","authors":"Sharon B. Garrett ,&nbsp;Jason R. Williams ,&nbsp;Beatriz H. Carlini ,&nbsp;David Hammond","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis legalization has increased the diversity of products available to people wishing to purchase cannabis. Understanding profiles of people who use cannabis, including use of different product types and how these relate to adverse events and risk beliefs may aid public health professionals, clinicians, and people who use cannabis who are seeking to reduce the risk of cannabis use. This cross-sectional study used data from Washington State residents between 16 and 65 years old collected between 2019 and 2022 as part of the International Cannabis Policy Study to characterize of patterns of use through Latent Profile Analysis. The study describes six cluster groups made up of those who reported past year cannabis use (N = 3298) that differed by frequency of use of cannabis product types, ranging from the lowest use group that averaged weekly use of primarily flower to a group characterized by daily use of concentrates. Contrasting with clinical studies that indicate that adverse events increase with THC levels and frequency of use, this group reported significantly fewer adverse events than the group with the next most frequent use who reported a greater variety of product types. These findings may be influenced by transitions between groups, which are not captured in this cross-sectional study. The four groups with most frequent use and greatest variety of product types, were all significantly more likely to self-identify as “addicted” than the lowest use, primarily flower, group. There were few differences in risk beliefs between groups. Efforts to reduce cannabis risk should focus on reducing frequency of use and possibly limiting polymodal cannabis use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"273 ","pages":"Article 112728"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625001814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cannabis legalization has increased the diversity of products available to people wishing to purchase cannabis. Understanding profiles of people who use cannabis, including use of different product types and how these relate to adverse events and risk beliefs may aid public health professionals, clinicians, and people who use cannabis who are seeking to reduce the risk of cannabis use. This cross-sectional study used data from Washington State residents between 16 and 65 years old collected between 2019 and 2022 as part of the International Cannabis Policy Study to characterize of patterns of use through Latent Profile Analysis. The study describes six cluster groups made up of those who reported past year cannabis use (N = 3298) that differed by frequency of use of cannabis product types, ranging from the lowest use group that averaged weekly use of primarily flower to a group characterized by daily use of concentrates. Contrasting with clinical studies that indicate that adverse events increase with THC levels and frequency of use, this group reported significantly fewer adverse events than the group with the next most frequent use who reported a greater variety of product types. These findings may be influenced by transitions between groups, which are not captured in this cross-sectional study. The four groups with most frequent use and greatest variety of product types, were all significantly more likely to self-identify as “addicted” than the lowest use, primarily flower, group. There were few differences in risk beliefs between groups. Efforts to reduce cannabis risk should focus on reducing frequency of use and possibly limiting polymodal cannabis use.
大麻消费模式,不良事件和大麻风险信念:西澳州的潜在概况分析
大麻合法化增加了希望购买大麻的人可获得的产品的多样性。了解大麻使用者的概况,包括不同产品类型的使用情况,以及这些情况与不良事件和风险信念的关系,可能有助于公共卫生专业人员、临床医生和正在寻求减少大麻使用风险的大麻使用者。这项横断面研究使用了2019年至2022年期间收集的华盛顿州16至65岁居民的数据,作为国际大麻政策研究的一部分,通过潜在特征分析来表征使用模式。该研究描述了六个集群组,由报告去年大麻使用情况的人组成(N = 3298),这些群体使用大麻产品类型的频率不同,从平均每周使用主要花的最低使用组到以每天使用浓缩物为特征的组。临床研究表明,不良事件随着四氢大麻酚水平和使用频率的增加而增加,与此形成对比的是,这一组报告的不良事件明显少于使用频率第二高的一组,后者报告的产品类型种类更多。这些发现可能受到组间过渡的影响,这在本横断面研究中没有被捕获。使用频率最高、产品种类最多的四个群体,都比使用频率最低(主要是花)的群体更有可能自认为“上瘾”。两组之间的风险观念差异不大。减少大麻风险的努力应侧重于减少使用频率,并可能限制多模式大麻的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信