Hypercoagulability or coronary artery disease? Polygenic risk score unveils the mystery

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Douglas Jacoby MD, Sohil Golwala MD
{"title":"Hypercoagulability or coronary artery disease? Polygenic risk score unveils the mystery","authors":"Douglas Jacoby MD,&nbsp;Sohil Golwala MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><div>CB is a 58 year old nonsmoker without significant cardiovascular risk factors presented with a myocardial infarction with unclear etiology.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><div>To review a clinical scenario involving use of polygenic risk score (PRS) to clarify the etiology of cardiovascular event and further risk stratify to guide lipid management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CB was seen in the office at Lipid Clinic at Penn for further evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CB is a 58 year old nonsmoker male without family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) or any major cardiovascular risk factors, found to have extensive CAD when he presented with a STEMI s/p DES to RCA and PCI to PLA and PDA, along with non-critical lesions (30-40% stenosis) in LAD and Lcx. The STEMI occurred in the setting of COVID-19 infection, raising the question about true etiology.</div><div>Using conventional risk calculators, his 10-year ASCVD risk is estimated at about 6% (“borderline risk”), therefore underestimating his risk and extensive CAD. Some clinicians evaluating the patient focused towards hypercoagulability and thrombosis in the setting of his COVID infection, however that would not sufficiently explain his atherosclerotic disease.</div><div>Keeping in mind that the patient has two children and five siblings, it was important to assess his genetic risk despite lack of family history of CAD. His polygenic risk score for CAD riskshowed the 97th percentile risk, clarifying his cardiovascular risk factor and also prompting for more aggressive preventive treatment and cascade screening for family.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and globally. While the Framingham Risk Score and the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) provide a useful construct to guide the use of medications for cardiovascular prevention, they miss certain opportunities at early intervention, especially for patients with significant genetic risk. Hence, incorporation of genetics into risk prediction frameworks offer a wide range of opportunity for early detection toward earlier and targeted risk reduction strategies.</div><div>Polygenic risk score (PRS) is a novel tool in precision medicine to quantify inherited risk for a given disease based on the cumulative impact of many common sites of DNA variation. Although we do not anticipate PRS to replace traditional guideline based approach, it may indeed be helpful - and akin to other CAD risk-enhancing factors - when there is clinical uncertainty. As seen in our case, using a PRS for CAD can help explain the etiology of CAD, modify treatment goals, and more effectively screen relatives for otherwise unrecognized cardiovascular risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages e43-e44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287425001345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Synopsis

CB is a 58 year old nonsmoker without significant cardiovascular risk factors presented with a myocardial infarction with unclear etiology.

Objective/Purpose

To review a clinical scenario involving use of polygenic risk score (PRS) to clarify the etiology of cardiovascular event and further risk stratify to guide lipid management.

Methods

CB was seen in the office at Lipid Clinic at Penn for further evaluation.

Results

CB is a 58 year old nonsmoker male without family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) or any major cardiovascular risk factors, found to have extensive CAD when he presented with a STEMI s/p DES to RCA and PCI to PLA and PDA, along with non-critical lesions (30-40% stenosis) in LAD and Lcx. The STEMI occurred in the setting of COVID-19 infection, raising the question about true etiology.
Using conventional risk calculators, his 10-year ASCVD risk is estimated at about 6% (“borderline risk”), therefore underestimating his risk and extensive CAD. Some clinicians evaluating the patient focused towards hypercoagulability and thrombosis in the setting of his COVID infection, however that would not sufficiently explain his atherosclerotic disease.
Keeping in mind that the patient has two children and five siblings, it was important to assess his genetic risk despite lack of family history of CAD. His polygenic risk score for CAD riskshowed the 97th percentile risk, clarifying his cardiovascular risk factor and also prompting for more aggressive preventive treatment and cascade screening for family.

Conclusions

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and globally. While the Framingham Risk Score and the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) provide a useful construct to guide the use of medications for cardiovascular prevention, they miss certain opportunities at early intervention, especially for patients with significant genetic risk. Hence, incorporation of genetics into risk prediction frameworks offer a wide range of opportunity for early detection toward earlier and targeted risk reduction strategies.
Polygenic risk score (PRS) is a novel tool in precision medicine to quantify inherited risk for a given disease based on the cumulative impact of many common sites of DNA variation. Although we do not anticipate PRS to replace traditional guideline based approach, it may indeed be helpful - and akin to other CAD risk-enhancing factors - when there is clinical uncertainty. As seen in our case, using a PRS for CAD can help explain the etiology of CAD, modify treatment goals, and more effectively screen relatives for otherwise unrecognized cardiovascular risk.
高凝还是冠状动脉疾病?多基因风险评分揭开了谜团
背景/简介:iscb是一名58岁的非吸烟者,无明显心血管危险因素,并伴有病因不明的心肌梗死。目的/目的回顾多基因风险评分(PRS)的临床应用情况,以明确心血管事件的病因,进一步进行风险分层,指导血脂管理。方法在宾夕法尼亚大学脂质诊所办公室观察scb,进一步评估。结果scb是一名58岁的非吸烟男性,没有早发性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)家族史或任何主要心血管危险因素,当他出现STEMI s/p DES到RCA, PCI到PLA和PDA,以及LAD和Lcx的非关键病变(30-40%狭窄)时,发现有广泛的CAD。STEMI发生在COVID-19感染的背景下,引发了对真正病因的质疑。使用传统的风险计算器,他的10年ASCVD风险估计约为6%(“边缘风险”),因此低估了他的风险和广泛的CAD。一些临床医生在评估患者时关注于其COVID感染背景下的高凝血性和血栓形成,但这并不能充分解释其动脉粥样硬化性疾病。请记住,患者有两个孩子和五个兄弟姐妹,尽管没有CAD家族史,但评估其遗传风险很重要。他的冠心病多基因风险评分显示为第97百分位风险,明确了他的心血管风险因素,也提示了更积极的预防治疗和家庭级联筛查。结论心血管疾病是美国和全球的主要死亡原因。虽然Framingham风险评分和合并队列方程(PCE)提供了一个有用的结构来指导心血管预防药物的使用,但它们在早期干预中错过了某些机会,特别是对于具有显著遗传风险的患者。因此,将遗传学纳入风险预测框架为早期发现提供了广泛的机会,从而可以采取更早、更有针对性的降低风险战略。多基因风险评分(PRS)是精准医学中一种基于许多常见DNA变异位点的累积影响来量化特定疾病遗传风险的新工具。虽然我们不期望PRS取代传统的基于指南的方法,但当存在临床不确定性时,它确实可能有所帮助-类似于其他CAD风险增加因素。正如在我们的病例中所看到的,使用PRS诊断CAD可以帮助解释CAD的病因,修改治疗目标,并更有效地筛查亲属,否则无法识别心血管风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信