Educating providers about coronary artery calcium scoring testing in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification and racial disparities

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gurnoor Singh MD, Matthew Shotwell MD, Akruti Prabhakar MD, Andrea Ballinger MD, Dinesh Kalra MD, Manpreet Kaur MD
{"title":"Educating providers about coronary artery calcium scoring testing in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification and racial disparities","authors":"Gurnoor Singh MD,&nbsp;Matthew Shotwell MD,&nbsp;Akruti Prabhakar MD,&nbsp;Andrea Ballinger MD,&nbsp;Dinesh Kalra MD,&nbsp;Manpreet Kaur MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><div>Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring is a valuable modality in evaluating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk. Despite numerous benefits, many physicians lack familiarity with this modality. Additionally, racial disparities are observed in the utilization of CAC scoring which can potentially affect outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><div>We hypothesized that a focused educational intervention would significantly improve physicians' awareness, knowledge, and utilization of CAC scoring in clinical practice and help in reducing racial disparities. Our initiative through this study aims to improve physicians' understanding and application of CAC scoring and to address racial disparities in CAC scoring.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pre- and post-intervention study (Image 1) was conducted through a short questionnaire on 49 physicians. The intervention included a 10-minute educational session on CAC scoring and incorporating information on racial disparities. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire both before and after the intervention, and the results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed a significant increase in the percentage of correct responses from physicians, from an average of 64.35% before the intervention to 87% after the intervention (Image 2). 46 out of 49 physicians felt confident ordering CAC. There was a notable increase in the ordering of CAC post intervention. Additionally, correct responses regarding racial disparities rose significantly, from an average of 25% before the intervention to 88.24% afterward.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our short targeted educational intervention improved physicians' knowledge and confidence in using CAC scoring for ASCVD risk assessment. In addition, it created awareness of racial disparities, leading to more equitable practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 3","pages":"Page e48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287425001400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Synopsis

Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring is a valuable modality in evaluating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk. Despite numerous benefits, many physicians lack familiarity with this modality. Additionally, racial disparities are observed in the utilization of CAC scoring which can potentially affect outcomes.

Objective/Purpose

We hypothesized that a focused educational intervention would significantly improve physicians' awareness, knowledge, and utilization of CAC scoring in clinical practice and help in reducing racial disparities. Our initiative through this study aims to improve physicians' understanding and application of CAC scoring and to address racial disparities in CAC scoring.

Methods

A pre- and post-intervention study (Image 1) was conducted through a short questionnaire on 49 physicians. The intervention included a 10-minute educational session on CAC scoring and incorporating information on racial disparities. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire both before and after the intervention, and the results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

We observed a significant increase in the percentage of correct responses from physicians, from an average of 64.35% before the intervention to 87% after the intervention (Image 2). 46 out of 49 physicians felt confident ordering CAC. There was a notable increase in the ordering of CAC post intervention. Additionally, correct responses regarding racial disparities rose significantly, from an average of 25% before the intervention to 88.24% afterward.

Conclusions

Our short targeted educational intervention improved physicians' knowledge and confidence in using CAC scoring for ASCVD risk assessment. In addition, it created awareness of racial disparities, leading to more equitable practices.
在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的风险分层和种族差异中,对提供者进行冠状动脉钙评分测试的教育
背景/简介冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分是评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的一种有价值的方式。尽管有很多好处,但许多医生对这种方式不熟悉。此外,在使用CAC评分时观察到种族差异,这可能会影响结果。目的/目的我们假设有针对性的教育干预可以显著提高医生在临床实践中对CAC评分的认识、知识和使用,并有助于减少种族差异。我们的研究旨在提高医生对CAC评分的理解和应用,并解决CAC评分中的种族差异。方法对49名医生进行干预前和干预后研究(图1)。干预包括10分钟关于CAC评分的教育会议,并纳入有关种族差异的信息。在干预前后通过结构化问卷收集数据,并使用描述性和推断性统计对结果进行分析。结果:我们观察到医生的正确率显著增加,从干预前的平均64.35%增加到干预后的87%(图2)。49名医生中有46名有信心使用CAC。干预后,CAC排序显著增加。此外,关于种族差异的正确回答显著上升,从干预前的平均25%上升到干预后的88.24%。结论短期有针对性的教育干预提高了医师使用CAC评分进行ASCVD风险评估的知识和信心。此外,它还提高了人们对种族差异的认识,导致了更公平的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信