Drivers of podcast usage other than use & gratification: A task–technology fit perspective

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jacob Chun Cheng , Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu , Hong-Jyun Shen , Cheng-Lin Chen
{"title":"Drivers of podcast usage other than use & gratification: A task–technology fit perspective","authors":"Jacob Chun Cheng ,&nbsp;Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu ,&nbsp;Hong-Jyun Shen ,&nbsp;Cheng-Lin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiple studies have examined the use of podcasts, and most have employed the uses and gratifications (U&amp;G) theory to understand why individuals adopt this medium. The current study regards multitasking as a primary demand and employs the task–technology fit (TTF) theory to assess whether the focal technology of podcasts effectively fits the requirements of multitasking scenarios. We also consider person–technology fit (PTF) and explore whether the alignment between individual preferences (auditory and control needs) and technological characteristics affects individuals’ usage behavior. To investigate these aspects, we conducted an online survey in Taiwan and collected 315 responses. The path analysis results reveal that podcast usage is predominantly influenced by TTF, followed by U&amp;G and PTF (auditory and control factors). The configuration analysis further shows that PTF-auditory and U&amp;G may serve as substitutable drivers of podcast adoption. Interestingly, low usage intention does not necessarily imply the absence of U&amp;G motivations. This study contributes to podcast research by highlighting the fulfillment of multitasking needs as a key advantage of podcasts. Our findings challenge the traditional dominance of U&amp;G theory, suggesting that TTF plays a more significant role in podcast adoption than previously assumed. By integrating TTF and PTF, this study provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding digital media consumption. These insights not only refine podcast adoption research but also offer practical implications for content creators and platform developers seeking to enhance user engagement in multitasking contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 101515"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422325000407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple studies have examined the use of podcasts, and most have employed the uses and gratifications (U&G) theory to understand why individuals adopt this medium. The current study regards multitasking as a primary demand and employs the task–technology fit (TTF) theory to assess whether the focal technology of podcasts effectively fits the requirements of multitasking scenarios. We also consider person–technology fit (PTF) and explore whether the alignment between individual preferences (auditory and control needs) and technological characteristics affects individuals’ usage behavior. To investigate these aspects, we conducted an online survey in Taiwan and collected 315 responses. The path analysis results reveal that podcast usage is predominantly influenced by TTF, followed by U&G and PTF (auditory and control factors). The configuration analysis further shows that PTF-auditory and U&G may serve as substitutable drivers of podcast adoption. Interestingly, low usage intention does not necessarily imply the absence of U&G motivations. This study contributes to podcast research by highlighting the fulfillment of multitasking needs as a key advantage of podcasts. Our findings challenge the traditional dominance of U&G theory, suggesting that TTF plays a more significant role in podcast adoption than previously assumed. By integrating TTF and PTF, this study provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding digital media consumption. These insights not only refine podcast adoption research but also offer practical implications for content creators and platform developers seeking to enhance user engagement in multitasking contexts.
播客使用的驱动因素,而不是使用和满足:一个任务-技术契合的视角
许多研究已经调查了播客的使用情况,大多数研究都采用了使用和满足(U&;G)理论来理解为什么人们会采用这种媒介。本研究将多任务处理作为主要需求,运用任务-技术契合度(task-technology fit, TTF)理论来评估播客的焦点技术是否有效地契合多任务场景的需求。我们还考虑了人-技术契合度(PTF),并探讨了个人偏好(听觉和控制需求)与技术特征之间的一致性是否影响个人的使用行为。为了调查这些方面,我们在台湾进行了一项在线调查,收集了315份回复。通径分析结果显示,影响播客使用的主要因素是TTF,其次是U&;G和PTF(听觉和控制因素)。配置分析进一步表明,ptf -听觉和U&;G可能是播客采用的替代驱动因素。有趣的是,低使用意图并不一定意味着缺乏U&;G动机。这项研究通过强调多任务需求的满足作为播客的一个关键优势,为播客研究做出了贡献。我们的研究结果挑战了传统的U&;G理论的主导地位,表明TTF在播客采用中发挥的作用比之前假设的更重要。通过整合TTF和PTF,本研究为理解数字媒体消费提供了一个更全面的框架。这些见解不仅完善了播客采用研究,而且为寻求在多任务环境下提高用户参与度的内容创作者和平台开发人员提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信