Managing stream restoration: Framing and assessing the stream ecosystem services and biodiversity index (SESBI)

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geula Michael-Bitton , Shiri Zemah-Shamir , Boris Portnov
{"title":"Managing stream restoration: Framing and assessing the stream ecosystem services and biodiversity index (SESBI)","authors":"Geula Michael-Bitton ,&nbsp;Shiri Zemah-Shamir ,&nbsp;Boris Portnov","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Streams and rivers worldwide are heavily affected by human intervention and are often degraded despite the numerous ecosystem services they provide. The degradation is particularly severe in water-stressed regions and arid and semi-arid areas. Various indices have been developed to assess the health of streams and rivers and the ecosystem services they provide. However, existing indices need improvement to provide a straightforward tool for assessing the complexity of stream ecosystems in water-stressed climates while also accounting for the ecosystem services provided by streams and rivers. To achieve this goal, we developed the Stream Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Index (SESBI), which evaluates the health of streams based on six ecosystem services they provide: biodiversity conservation, water purification, riparian buffer zones, flood mitigation, recreation/ecotourism, and landscape ecology. The SESBI framework was developed based on existing literature, experts' in-depth interviews, and questionnaires, focusing on ES indicators that reflect ecological functioning and management priorities in water-stressed climates. We applied the SESBI to three streams in Israel and validated its performance using expert assessments and available data. Comparisons with local experts' ratings showed strong alignment, confirming the index's reliability and adaptability. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use ecosystem services as proxies to assess stream health in arid and semi-arid climates as a tool to monitor changes before and after rehabilitation. While designed for streams, this approach can be adapted for rivers with appropriate modifications. The index methodology developed in this research provides a valuable tool for planners, stakeholders, and decision-makers, offering an accessible yet scientifically robust approach to assessing and prioritizing ecosystem rehabilitation plans. This research contributes to the sustainable management of ecosystems on theoretical, empirical, and practical levels by simplifying the complexity of stream ecosystems into a practical and easy-to-apply framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"388 ","pages":"Article 125938"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725019140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Streams and rivers worldwide are heavily affected by human intervention and are often degraded despite the numerous ecosystem services they provide. The degradation is particularly severe in water-stressed regions and arid and semi-arid areas. Various indices have been developed to assess the health of streams and rivers and the ecosystem services they provide. However, existing indices need improvement to provide a straightforward tool for assessing the complexity of stream ecosystems in water-stressed climates while also accounting for the ecosystem services provided by streams and rivers. To achieve this goal, we developed the Stream Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Index (SESBI), which evaluates the health of streams based on six ecosystem services they provide: biodiversity conservation, water purification, riparian buffer zones, flood mitigation, recreation/ecotourism, and landscape ecology. The SESBI framework was developed based on existing literature, experts' in-depth interviews, and questionnaires, focusing on ES indicators that reflect ecological functioning and management priorities in water-stressed climates. We applied the SESBI to three streams in Israel and validated its performance using expert assessments and available data. Comparisons with local experts' ratings showed strong alignment, confirming the index's reliability and adaptability. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use ecosystem services as proxies to assess stream health in arid and semi-arid climates as a tool to monitor changes before and after rehabilitation. While designed for streams, this approach can be adapted for rivers with appropriate modifications. The index methodology developed in this research provides a valuable tool for planners, stakeholders, and decision-makers, offering an accessible yet scientifically robust approach to assessing and prioritizing ecosystem rehabilitation plans. This research contributes to the sustainable management of ecosystems on theoretical, empirical, and practical levels by simplifying the complexity of stream ecosystems into a practical and easy-to-apply framework.

Abstract Image

河流恢复管理:河流生态系统服务和生物多样性指数(SESBI)的构建和评估
世界各地的溪流和河流受到人类干预的严重影响,尽管它们提供了许多生态系统服务,但往往会退化。在缺水地区以及干旱和半干旱地区,这种退化尤为严重。已经制定了各种指数来评估溪流和河流的健康状况及其提供的生态系统服务。然而,现有的指数需要改进,以提供一种直接的工具来评估缺水气候下河流生态系统的复杂性,同时也考虑到溪流和河流提供的生态系统服务。为了实现这一目标,我们开发了河流生态系统服务和生物多样性指数(SESBI),该指数基于河流提供的六种生态系统服务来评估河流的健康状况:生物多样性保护、水净化、河岸缓冲区、洪水缓解、娱乐/生态旅游和景观生态。SESBI框架是在现有文献、专家深度访谈和问卷调查的基础上开发的,重点关注反映水资源紧张气候下生态功能和管理重点的ES指标。我们将SESBI应用于以色列的三个流,并使用专家评估和可用数据验证其性能。与当地专家评级的比较显示出很强的一致性,证实了该指数的可靠性和适应性。据我们所知,这项研究是第一次使用生态系统服务作为代理来评估干旱和半干旱气候下的河流健康,作为监测恢复前后变化的工具。虽然这种方法是为溪流设计的,但经过适当的修改,也可以适用于河流。本研究开发的指数方法为规划者、利益相关者和决策者提供了一个有价值的工具,为评估和优先考虑生态系统恢复计划提供了一种可访问且科学可靠的方法。该研究通过将河流生态系统的复杂性简化为一个实用且易于应用的框架,为生态系统的可持续管理在理论、实证和实践层面做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信