† Cholesterol treatment trends from 2014 - 2023 in 3 Million US individuals with ASCVD: a retrospective cohort analysis using the Family Heart DatabaseTM
Diane MacDougall MS, Hilly Paige BS, Seth Baum MD, Katherine Wilemon BS, Keith Ferdinand MD
{"title":"† Cholesterol treatment trends from 2014 - 2023 in 3 Million US individuals with ASCVD: a retrospective cohort analysis using the Family Heart DatabaseTM","authors":"Diane MacDougall MS, Hilly Paige BS, Seth Baum MD, Katherine Wilemon BS, Keith Ferdinand MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><div>Over the last decade, the preponderance of clinical trial data and the availability of innovative therapies have supported attainment of lower LDL-C levels, while the 2018 US guideline and quality measures have primarily emphasized use of statins. How these and other factors have impacted cholesterol treatment over time is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><div>This real-world data analysis aims to characterize annual use of LDL-C lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals in US individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort analysis using medical claims and lab data from the Family Heart DatabaseTM that was created by the Family Heart Foundation. Individuals with an ASCVD diagnosis prior to 2014 and ≥ 1 medication claim every year from 2014 to 2023 were included. Cholesterol lowering therapies included statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9is), ezetimibe and bempedoic acid. Percentages were adjusted for age and sex using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals (n=3,042,530) with mean (SD) age 63.7 (9.2) years were 45% female. From 2014 to 2023, annual use of low/moderate intensity statins consistently decreased from 34% to 27%, while corresponding use of high intensity statins increased from 17% to 29%. Use of cholesterol lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals increased over time; however, in 2023 just 55% of individuals were receiving LDL-C lowering therapy and only 34% had attained an LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (see table).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the largest analysis of cholesterol treatment trends in US individuals with ASCVD to date, use of LDL-C lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals gradually improved from 2014 to 2023. However, by 2023, 66% of these individuals failed to attain an LDL-C level < 70 mg/dL and 45% received no LDL-C lowering therapy. These findings highlight suboptimal cholesterol treatment and slow improvement over time despite increasing availability of multiple cost-effective and safe therapies.</div><div><strong>Previously Published:</strong> Yes, Accepted for oral presentation at EAS May 2025 in Glasgow</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 3","pages":"Page e11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287425000911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Synopsis
Over the last decade, the preponderance of clinical trial data and the availability of innovative therapies have supported attainment of lower LDL-C levels, while the 2018 US guideline and quality measures have primarily emphasized use of statins. How these and other factors have impacted cholesterol treatment over time is unknown.
Objective/Purpose
This real-world data analysis aims to characterize annual use of LDL-C lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals in US individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis using medical claims and lab data from the Family Heart DatabaseTM that was created by the Family Heart Foundation. Individuals with an ASCVD diagnosis prior to 2014 and ≥ 1 medication claim every year from 2014 to 2023 were included. Cholesterol lowering therapies included statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9is), ezetimibe and bempedoic acid. Percentages were adjusted for age and sex using logistic regression.
Results
Individuals (n=3,042,530) with mean (SD) age 63.7 (9.2) years were 45% female. From 2014 to 2023, annual use of low/moderate intensity statins consistently decreased from 34% to 27%, while corresponding use of high intensity statins increased from 17% to 29%. Use of cholesterol lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals increased over time; however, in 2023 just 55% of individuals were receiving LDL-C lowering therapy and only 34% had attained an LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (see table).
Conclusions
In the largest analysis of cholesterol treatment trends in US individuals with ASCVD to date, use of LDL-C lowering therapies and attainment of LDL-C goals gradually improved from 2014 to 2023. However, by 2023, 66% of these individuals failed to attain an LDL-C level < 70 mg/dL and 45% received no LDL-C lowering therapy. These findings highlight suboptimal cholesterol treatment and slow improvement over time despite increasing availability of multiple cost-effective and safe therapies.
Previously Published: Yes, Accepted for oral presentation at EAS May 2025 in Glasgow
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.