Tracking nitrate sources and transport pathways in riparian wetlands using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian mixing model

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhendong Hong , Pengwei Qiu , Yu Xi , Qinghe Zhao , Shengyan Ding
{"title":"Tracking nitrate sources and transport pathways in riparian wetlands using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian mixing model","authors":"Zhendong Hong ,&nbsp;Pengwei Qiu ,&nbsp;Yu Xi ,&nbsp;Qinghe Zhao ,&nbsp;Shengyan Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) sources and key transport pathways is essential to manage diffuse NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> pollution, particularly in riparian wetlands where nitrate pollution is a major contribution to eutrophication. In this study, we used multiple tracers to assess the contribution of multiple NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> sources and transport pathways in the riparian wetlands along the lower Yellow River during four hydrological seasons. The results revealed that NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> concentrations in approximately 12.2 % riparian wetland water along the lower Yellow River were higher than the Chinese government and WHO allowed threshold (10 mg/L), particularly in wetlands outside the dykes during high flow seasons. The signature of hydrochemical parameters and stable isotopes (δ<sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>, δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O) values illustrated multiple sources recharge NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> levels in riparian wetland water, rather than biogeochemical processes. A Bayesian mixing model based on dual nitrate isotope values further revealed that chemical fertilizer (35 %), soil organic nitrogen (33 %), and manure/sewage (26 %) served as the main NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> source recharging riparian wetlands water. Of the main nitrate transport pathways, groundwater (34 %), the Yellow River (33 %), and canal water (28 %) contributed more to riparian wetlands water pollution that did atmospheric deposition (precipitation). However, both source and the relative importance of certain transport pathways of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> varied both spatially and temporally. These results are critical for better informing the management and restoration of riparian wetlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109201"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034181622500503X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying nitrate (NO3) sources and key transport pathways is essential to manage diffuse NO3 pollution, particularly in riparian wetlands where nitrate pollution is a major contribution to eutrophication. In this study, we used multiple tracers to assess the contribution of multiple NO3 sources and transport pathways in the riparian wetlands along the lower Yellow River during four hydrological seasons. The results revealed that NO3 concentrations in approximately 12.2 % riparian wetland water along the lower Yellow River were higher than the Chinese government and WHO allowed threshold (10 mg/L), particularly in wetlands outside the dykes during high flow seasons. The signature of hydrochemical parameters and stable isotopes (δ15N-NO3, δ18O-NO3 and δ18O-H2O) values illustrated multiple sources recharge NO3 levels in riparian wetland water, rather than biogeochemical processes. A Bayesian mixing model based on dual nitrate isotope values further revealed that chemical fertilizer (35 %), soil organic nitrogen (33 %), and manure/sewage (26 %) served as the main NO3 source recharging riparian wetlands water. Of the main nitrate transport pathways, groundwater (34 %), the Yellow River (33 %), and canal water (28 %) contributed more to riparian wetlands water pollution that did atmospheric deposition (precipitation). However, both source and the relative importance of certain transport pathways of NO3 varied both spatially and temporally. These results are critical for better informing the management and restoration of riparian wetlands.

Abstract Image

利用多示踪剂方法结合贝叶斯混合模型跟踪河岸湿地中硝酸盐的来源和运输途径
确定硝酸盐(NO3−)的来源和主要运输途径对于管理弥漫性NO3−污染至关重要,特别是在硝酸盐污染是富营养化的主要原因的河岸湿地。在本研究中,我们使用多种示踪剂评估了四个水文季节黄河下游河岸湿地中多种NO3−来源和运输途径的贡献。结果表明,黄河下游约12.2%的河岸湿地水体NO3−浓度高于中国政府和世界卫生组织允许的阈值(10 mg/L),特别是在高流量季节堤外湿地。水化学参数和稳定同位素(δ15N-NO3−、δ18O-NO3−和δ18O-H2O)值的特征表明,河岸湿地水体中有多种来源补给NO3−水平,而不是生物地球化学过程。基于双硝态氮同位素值的贝叶斯混合模型进一步表明,化肥(35%)、土壤有机氮(33%)和粪肥/污水(26%)是河岸湿地水体NO3 -补给的主要来源。在主要的硝酸盐输送途径中,地下水(34%)、黄河(33%)和运河水(28%)对河岸湿地水污染的贡献大于大气沉积(降水)。然而,NO3−的来源和某些运输途径的相对重要性在空间和时间上都是不同的。这些结果对于更好地为河岸湿地的管理和恢复提供信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信