Zahid Ahmad MD, Christie Tran BS, Michael Pannell BS, Tanvi Ingle MS
{"title":"Statin use among uninsured individuals in a charity community clinic","authors":"Zahid Ahmad MD, Christie Tran BS, Michael Pannell BS, Tanvi Ingle MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.04.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><div>Limited data exist on lipid-lowering treatment in vulnerable populations, particularly those receiving primary care at charity community clinics. These clinics serve uninsured individuals with little to no access to healthcare providers, including safety-net healthcare systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><div>To assess statin therapy among statin-eligible patients at a primary care charity clinic (North Dallas Shared Ministry, NDSM; Dallas, TX).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried the electronic medical records (Athena Health) at NDSM (2016-2024) to extract demographic data, ICD-10 diagnoses, laboratory values, and statin prescriptions for both children and adults. Patients were categorized into four statin benefit groups per the 2018 AHA/ACA cholesterol guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with statin prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 5,097 children (51% female, 89% Hispanic), 28 had lipids checked. One child had LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL, potentially qualifying for statin therapy. Among 34,982 adults (median age 41 years, 61% female, 86% Hispanic), 985 had lipids testing and sufficient data to determine if they belong to a statin benefit group. Statin prescription rates by benefit group were: ASCVD (n=43): 70%; diabetes (n=597): 58%; LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL (n=39): 87%; ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5%: 41%. Overall, 54% of statin-eligible patients were prescribed statins. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with statin prescriptions included age (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8, 3.6), diabetes diagnosis (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.2, 11.5), total cholesterol (OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.1, 3.0), and HDL-C (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 0.7), (p < 0.0001, C-index 0.889).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among uninsured patients in a primary care, charity community clinic, statin prescription rates were slightly higher than those reported in insured populations (∼50%), with similar predictors of statin prescriptions (<em>e.g.,</em> age, diabetes diagnosis, lipid levels). However, lipid screening was infrequent – only 3% of adult patients had lipids checked – suggesting most statin-eligible patients likely remain unidentified. These findings highlight a critical gap: the need to improve lipid screening in uninsured populations to ensure at-risk individuals are identified and treated appropriately. In addition, future analyses should assess not only statin prescription rates but also whether patients receive appropriate statin intensity and non-statin therapies like ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":"19 3","pages":"Page e53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287425001473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Synopsis
Limited data exist on lipid-lowering treatment in vulnerable populations, particularly those receiving primary care at charity community clinics. These clinics serve uninsured individuals with little to no access to healthcare providers, including safety-net healthcare systems.
Objective/Purpose
To assess statin therapy among statin-eligible patients at a primary care charity clinic (North Dallas Shared Ministry, NDSM; Dallas, TX).
Methods
We queried the electronic medical records (Athena Health) at NDSM (2016-2024) to extract demographic data, ICD-10 diagnoses, laboratory values, and statin prescriptions for both children and adults. Patients were categorized into four statin benefit groups per the 2018 AHA/ACA cholesterol guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with statin prescriptions.
Results
Among 5,097 children (51% female, 89% Hispanic), 28 had lipids checked. One child had LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL, potentially qualifying for statin therapy. Among 34,982 adults (median age 41 years, 61% female, 86% Hispanic), 985 had lipids testing and sufficient data to determine if they belong to a statin benefit group. Statin prescription rates by benefit group were: ASCVD (n=43): 70%; diabetes (n=597): 58%; LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL (n=39): 87%; ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5%: 41%. Overall, 54% of statin-eligible patients were prescribed statins. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with statin prescriptions included age (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8, 3.6), diabetes diagnosis (OR 6.0, 95% CI 3.2, 11.5), total cholesterol (OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.1, 3.0), and HDL-C (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 0.7), (p < 0.0001, C-index 0.889).
Conclusions
Among uninsured patients in a primary care, charity community clinic, statin prescription rates were slightly higher than those reported in insured populations (∼50%), with similar predictors of statin prescriptions (e.g., age, diabetes diagnosis, lipid levels). However, lipid screening was infrequent – only 3% of adult patients had lipids checked – suggesting most statin-eligible patients likely remain unidentified. These findings highlight a critical gap: the need to improve lipid screening in uninsured populations to ensure at-risk individuals are identified and treated appropriately. In addition, future analyses should assess not only statin prescription rates but also whether patients receive appropriate statin intensity and non-statin therapies like ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.