{"title":"Blockchain and homomorphic encryption for genomic and health data sharing: An ethical perspective","authors":"S.A. Ahmed , R. Hrzic","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sharing genomic data is crucial for public health research, yet it poses significant privacy risks, necessitating innovative solutions to balance data accessibility with individual protection. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of a hybrid system integrating blockchain and homomorphic encryption for secure genomic data sharing in health contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a literature review of studies in MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and used the eight peer-reviewed studies uncovered to construct an in-depth description of the hybrid system. We then assessed its performance in achieving public ethics objectives using a framework derived from published public health ethics principles pertaining to data sharing in public health. The evaluation involved conducting a thematic analysis of the information relevant to each objective from the published studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that the hybrid system aligns well with tenets of public health ethics, including accountability, fairness, respect for persons, privacy, and public health goals, through mechanisms like transparent record-keeping, secure data access, and privacy-preserving computation. However, scalability poses a major challenge, hindered by computational overhead and insufficient stakeholder comprehension.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results imply that while the hybrid system can support data sharing while safeguarding individual rights, its practical implementation is limited without addressing scalability. This study underscores the need to highlight scalability as a fundamental ethical principle in evaluating digital public health technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sharing genomic data is crucial for public health research, yet it poses significant privacy risks, necessitating innovative solutions to balance data accessibility with individual protection. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of a hybrid system integrating blockchain and homomorphic encryption for secure genomic data sharing in health contexts.
Methods
We conducted a literature review of studies in MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and used the eight peer-reviewed studies uncovered to construct an in-depth description of the hybrid system. We then assessed its performance in achieving public ethics objectives using a framework derived from published public health ethics principles pertaining to data sharing in public health. The evaluation involved conducting a thematic analysis of the information relevant to each objective from the published studies.
Results
We find that the hybrid system aligns well with tenets of public health ethics, including accountability, fairness, respect for persons, privacy, and public health goals, through mechanisms like transparent record-keeping, secure data access, and privacy-preserving computation. However, scalability poses a major challenge, hindered by computational overhead and insufficient stakeholder comprehension.
Conclusions
Our results imply that while the hybrid system can support data sharing while safeguarding individual rights, its practical implementation is limited without addressing scalability. This study underscores the need to highlight scalability as a fundamental ethical principle in evaluating digital public health technologies.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.