Blockchain and homomorphic encryption for genomic and health data sharing: An ethical perspective

Q3 Medicine
S.A. Ahmed , R. Hrzic
{"title":"Blockchain and homomorphic encryption for genomic and health data sharing: An ethical perspective","authors":"S.A. Ahmed ,&nbsp;R. Hrzic","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sharing genomic data is crucial for public health research, yet it poses significant privacy risks, necessitating innovative solutions to balance data accessibility with individual protection. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of a hybrid system integrating blockchain and homomorphic encryption for secure genomic data sharing in health contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a literature review of studies in MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and used the eight peer-reviewed studies uncovered to construct an in-depth description of the hybrid system. We then assessed its performance in achieving public ethics objectives using a framework derived from published public health ethics principles pertaining to data sharing in public health. The evaluation involved conducting a thematic analysis of the information relevant to each objective from the published studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that the hybrid system aligns well with tenets of public health ethics, including accountability, fairness, respect for persons, privacy, and public health goals, through mechanisms like transparent record-keeping, secure data access, and privacy-preserving computation. However, scalability poses a major challenge, hindered by computational overhead and insufficient stakeholder comprehension.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results imply that while the hybrid system can support data sharing while safeguarding individual rights, its practical implementation is limited without addressing scalability. This study underscores the need to highlight scalability as a fundamental ethical principle in evaluating digital public health technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sharing genomic data is crucial for public health research, yet it poses significant privacy risks, necessitating innovative solutions to balance data accessibility with individual protection. This study investigates the ethical dimensions of a hybrid system integrating blockchain and homomorphic encryption for secure genomic data sharing in health contexts.

Methods

We conducted a literature review of studies in MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and used the eight peer-reviewed studies uncovered to construct an in-depth description of the hybrid system. We then assessed its performance in achieving public ethics objectives using a framework derived from published public health ethics principles pertaining to data sharing in public health. The evaluation involved conducting a thematic analysis of the information relevant to each objective from the published studies.

Results

We find that the hybrid system aligns well with tenets of public health ethics, including accountability, fairness, respect for persons, privacy, and public health goals, through mechanisms like transparent record-keeping, secure data access, and privacy-preserving computation. However, scalability poses a major challenge, hindered by computational overhead and insufficient stakeholder comprehension.

Conclusions

Our results imply that while the hybrid system can support data sharing while safeguarding individual rights, its practical implementation is limited without addressing scalability. This study underscores the need to highlight scalability as a fundamental ethical principle in evaluating digital public health technologies.
基因组和健康数据共享的区块链和同态加密:伦理观点
共享基因组数据对公共卫生研究至关重要,但它带来了重大的隐私风险,需要创新的解决方案来平衡数据可访问性和个人保护。本研究探讨了整合区块链和同态加密的混合系统在健康环境下安全基因组数据共享的伦理维度。方法对MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar上的相关研究进行文献综述,并利用已发现的8篇同行评议研究对该混合系统进行深入描述。然后,我们使用与公共卫生数据共享相关的已发表的公共卫生伦理原则衍生的框架来评估其在实现公共卫生伦理目标方面的表现。评价涉及对已发表的研究报告中与每个目标有关的资料进行专题分析。结果我们发现,混合系统通过透明的记录保存、安全的数据访问和隐私保护计算等机制,很好地符合公共卫生伦理原则,包括问责制、公平、尊重个人、隐私和公共卫生目标。然而,可伸缩性带来了重大挑战,受到计算开销和涉众理解不足的阻碍。结论混合系统虽然可以在保障个人权利的同时支持数据共享,但其实际实施受到限制,没有解决可扩展性问题。这项研究强调,在评估数字公共卫生技术时,需要强调可扩展性是一项基本的伦理原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信