Optimization-based trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles in scenarios with multiple reference lines

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Xi Zhang , Zheng Zang , Xinran Chen , Yaomin Lu , Jianyong Qi , Jianwei Gong
{"title":"Optimization-based trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles in scenarios with multiple reference lines","authors":"Xi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zheng Zang ,&nbsp;Xinran Chen ,&nbsp;Yaomin Lu ,&nbsp;Jianyong Qi ,&nbsp;Jianwei Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enabling autonomous vehicles to adhere to the reference line as much as possible is a regulatory consensus that ensures predictability in vehicle’s behavior within mixed traffic flow, thereby reducing the risk of accidents. State-of-the-art Cartesian-based trajectory planning methods overcome limitations inherent in traditional Frenet-based approaches, particularly regarding constraint violations in high-curvature scenarios. However, these methods encounter theoretical challenges in handling reference line constraints, hindering their direct application in road scenarios. In this paper, an optimization-based trajectory planning method in Cartesian Frame is proposed to address road scenarios with multiple reference lines. The main work can be summarized into three parts. In the first part, The on-road trajectory planning task is reframed as an Optimal Control Problem (OCP) with multiple-reference lines constraints (MRLC), where the nominal OCP ensures safety and feasibility. The incorporation of nominal MRLC ensures that the generated trajectory closely follows the reference lines while maintaining the trajectory’s longitudinal deformation capability. However, nominal MRLC, which involves a minimum optimization problem when describing the distance between the trajectory and reference lines, cannot be directly embedded into an OCP. To address this issue, in the second part, an approximate calculation method is proposed to explicitly describe MRLC. The MRLC constructed in this way not only preserves the trajectory’s good deformability but also handles the generation of continuous lane-changing trajectories. In the third part, an improved dynamic programming approach tailored for multi-reference line scenarios is proposed, providing high-quality initial guesses for OCP-MRLC to enhance its convergence speed. Finally, comprehensive benchmarking against state-of-the-art methods is presented, showcasing the significance of the proposed OCP-MRLC in meeting reference line constraints and ensuring trajectory quality. Experiments conducted with real-world datasets validate the practicality of the algorithm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106407"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125001704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enabling autonomous vehicles to adhere to the reference line as much as possible is a regulatory consensus that ensures predictability in vehicle’s behavior within mixed traffic flow, thereby reducing the risk of accidents. State-of-the-art Cartesian-based trajectory planning methods overcome limitations inherent in traditional Frenet-based approaches, particularly regarding constraint violations in high-curvature scenarios. However, these methods encounter theoretical challenges in handling reference line constraints, hindering their direct application in road scenarios. In this paper, an optimization-based trajectory planning method in Cartesian Frame is proposed to address road scenarios with multiple reference lines. The main work can be summarized into three parts. In the first part, The on-road trajectory planning task is reframed as an Optimal Control Problem (OCP) with multiple-reference lines constraints (MRLC), where the nominal OCP ensures safety and feasibility. The incorporation of nominal MRLC ensures that the generated trajectory closely follows the reference lines while maintaining the trajectory’s longitudinal deformation capability. However, nominal MRLC, which involves a minimum optimization problem when describing the distance between the trajectory and reference lines, cannot be directly embedded into an OCP. To address this issue, in the second part, an approximate calculation method is proposed to explicitly describe MRLC. The MRLC constructed in this way not only preserves the trajectory’s good deformability but also handles the generation of continuous lane-changing trajectories. In the third part, an improved dynamic programming approach tailored for multi-reference line scenarios is proposed, providing high-quality initial guesses for OCP-MRLC to enhance its convergence speed. Finally, comprehensive benchmarking against state-of-the-art methods is presented, showcasing the significance of the proposed OCP-MRLC in meeting reference line constraints and ensuring trajectory quality. Experiments conducted with real-world datasets validate the practicality of the algorithm.
基于优化的多参考线自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划
让自动驾驶汽车尽可能地遵循参考线是一种监管共识,可以确保在混合交通流中车辆行为的可预测性,从而降低事故风险。最先进的基于笛卡尔的轨迹规划方法克服了传统基于frenet的方法固有的局限性,特别是在高曲率场景下的约束违反。然而,这些方法在处理参考线约束方面遇到了理论挑战,阻碍了它们在道路场景中的直接应用。针对具有多条参考线的道路场景,提出了一种基于优化的笛卡尔坐标系下的轨迹规划方法。本文的主要工作可以概括为三个部分。在第一部分中,将道路轨迹规划任务重构为具有多参考线约束(MRLC)的最优控制问题(OCP),其中标称的OCP保证安全性和可行性。标称MRLC的引入确保了生成的轨迹在保持轨迹纵向变形能力的同时紧跟参考线。然而,标称MRLC在描述轨迹和参考线之间的距离时涉及最小优化问题,不能直接嵌入到OCP中。为了解决这一问题,第二部分提出了一种近似计算方法来明确描述MRLC。这样构建的MRLC既保持了轨迹良好的可变形性,又处理了连续变道轨迹的生成。在第三部分,提出了一种针对多参考线场景的改进动态规划方法,为OCP-MRLC提供了高质量的初始猜测,以提高其收敛速度。最后,针对最先进的方法进行了全面的基准测试,展示了所提出的OCP-MRLC在满足参考线约束和确保轨迹质量方面的重要性。用实际数据集进行的实验验证了该算法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信