Weili Li , Minghao Zhuang , Lei Feng , Wei Wei , Longlong Xia , Yi Yang
{"title":"Carbon and reactive nitrogen footprint of greenhouse versus open-field vegetable production in China","authors":"Weili Li , Minghao Zhuang , Lei Feng , Wei Wei , Longlong Xia , Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global greenhouse vegetables production has grown substantially and will play a critical role in meeting future global vegetable demand. However, the environmental performance of large-scale greenhouse vegetable production compared to open-field cultivation remains unclear. Through carbon and reactive nitrogen footprint analysis of provincial-scale vegetable production in China, we show that greenhouse production has mixed performances, with benefits smaller than observed in many experiments. Greenhouse vegetables have higher yields (16 % to 50 %) and lower reactive nitrogen footprints (-6 % to -33 %), but much higher carbon footprints (5 % to 46 %), than open-field vegetables. By analyzing extensive experiment data, however, we find that adopting improved fertilizer and irrigation management practices can substantially increase yields while reducing carbon and reactive nitrogen footprints (by 33% and 37 %) in greenhouses, as well as in open-fields. Our study indicates that the environmental sustainability of greenhouse vegetable in China can be improved, thus contributing to potential global dietary transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108400"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global greenhouse vegetables production has grown substantially and will play a critical role in meeting future global vegetable demand. However, the environmental performance of large-scale greenhouse vegetable production compared to open-field cultivation remains unclear. Through carbon and reactive nitrogen footprint analysis of provincial-scale vegetable production in China, we show that greenhouse production has mixed performances, with benefits smaller than observed in many experiments. Greenhouse vegetables have higher yields (16 % to 50 %) and lower reactive nitrogen footprints (-6 % to -33 %), but much higher carbon footprints (5 % to 46 %), than open-field vegetables. By analyzing extensive experiment data, however, we find that adopting improved fertilizer and irrigation management practices can substantially increase yields while reducing carbon and reactive nitrogen footprints (by 33% and 37 %) in greenhouses, as well as in open-fields. Our study indicates that the environmental sustainability of greenhouse vegetable in China can be improved, thus contributing to potential global dietary transitions.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.