{"title":"The expanding role of Nurse Practitioners in optimizing heart failure treatment","authors":"P.E. Astie , L. Filippetti , N. Girerd","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.04.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Achieving optimal care for heart failure (HF) remains challenging in clinical practice, with a significant proportion of HF patients not receiving guideline-recommended treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the role of Nurse practitioner (NP)-Enhanced Therapeutic Management on therapeutic management after discharge of patients hospitalized for acute HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied 187 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute HF with LVEF<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->50% in our Cardiology department in 2022–2023. Patients were analyzed whether they underwent a classic follow-up by a cardiologist alone or a cardiologist associated with a NP, who was qualified to provide patient education and adjust heart failure medications. The association of NP-enhanced follow-up on HF medication dosages (assessed via the KCMO score) and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF readmission was evaluated at the first post-discharge consultation and 6 months later.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-five patients underwent combined monitoring by NPs and cardiologists and 132 monitoring by cardiologists alone. KCMO score progression was significantly more important in the “NP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->cardiologist group” (ΔKCMO 11.5 vs 1.4 with a mean difference of 9.83 [3.01 to 16.65]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005). Patients in the “NP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->cardiologist” monitoring group received more non-pharmacological care for HF, including home-visiting programs (94.5% vs 34.4%; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001), telemonitoring (83.6% vs 16.2%; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001), and therapeutic patient education (43.6% vs 6.1%; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001), compared to usual follow-up. Composite criteria was 50% lower in the “NP<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->cardiologist” group six months after discharge (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27–0.93]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.028) (<span><span>Figure 1</span></span>, <span><span>Figure 2</span></span>, <span><span>Figure 3</span></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NP-enhanced management is associated with a more rapid up-titration of HF GDMT and higher inclusions in non-pharmaceutical care programs six months after discharge for acute HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 6","pages":"Page S239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213625002682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Achieving optimal care for heart failure (HF) remains challenging in clinical practice, with a significant proportion of HF patients not receiving guideline-recommended treatments.
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the role of Nurse practitioner (NP)-Enhanced Therapeutic Management on therapeutic management after discharge of patients hospitalized for acute HF.
Methods
We studied 187 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute HF with LVEF < 50% in our Cardiology department in 2022–2023. Patients were analyzed whether they underwent a classic follow-up by a cardiologist alone or a cardiologist associated with a NP, who was qualified to provide patient education and adjust heart failure medications. The association of NP-enhanced follow-up on HF medication dosages (assessed via the KCMO score) and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HF readmission was evaluated at the first post-discharge consultation and 6 months later.
Results
Fifty-five patients underwent combined monitoring by NPs and cardiologists and 132 monitoring by cardiologists alone. KCMO score progression was significantly more important in the “NP + cardiologist group” (ΔKCMO 11.5 vs 1.4 with a mean difference of 9.83 [3.01 to 16.65]; P = 0.005). Patients in the “NP + cardiologist” monitoring group received more non-pharmacological care for HF, including home-visiting programs (94.5% vs 34.4%; P < 0.0001), telemonitoring (83.6% vs 16.2%; P < 0.0001), and therapeutic patient education (43.6% vs 6.1%; P < 0.0001), compared to usual follow-up. Composite criteria was 50% lower in the “NP + cardiologist” group six months after discharge (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.27–0.93]; P = 0.028) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).
Conclusion
NP-enhanced management is associated with a more rapid up-titration of HF GDMT and higher inclusions in non-pharmaceutical care programs six months after discharge for acute HF.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.