Sónia L. Coelho de Sousa , Miriam I. Marrufo Pérez , Peter T. Johannesen , Marcelo Gómez Álvarez , Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
{"title":"No association between idiopathic hidden hearing loss and behavioral adaptation to noise in humans","authors":"Sónia L. Coelho de Sousa , Miriam I. Marrufo Pérez , Peter T. Johannesen , Marcelo Gómez Álvarez , Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptation to noise refers to the improvement in word-in-noise recognition as words are delayed a few hundred milliseconds in the noise. This adaptation is thought to reflect adjustments of the dynamic range of auditory neurons to the most frequent noise level. Evidence from a mouse model suggests that hidden hearing loss (HHL), a diminished auditory nerve response without a hearing loss, selectively impairs neural dynamic range adaptation to loud sound environments. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether HHL is associated with poor behavioral adaptation to loud noise in speech recognition.</div><div>For 89 people (aged 19–86 years) with clinically normal hearing, we measured speech reception thresholds (SRTs; signal-to-noise ratios at 50 % recognition) for disyllabic words in stationary, speech-shaped noise. SRTs were measured for words delayed 50 and 800 ms in the noise and for noise levels of 55 and 78 dB SPL. Adaptation was calculated as the SRT improvement in the long-delay relative to the short-delay condition. Because adaptation is greater for vocoded than for natural words, words were processed through a tone vocoder. The response of the auditory nerve was assessed using the amplitude of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I and the rate of growth (slope) of the wave I amplitude with increasing stimulus level.</div><div>Adaptation occurred at the two noise levels but was greater for the louder noise than for the softer noise (2.3 dB vs 1.3 dB, respectively). This happened because SRTs were worse for the louder noise in the short but not in the long delay condition. The large variability in ABR wave I amplitude (0.10 to 0.54 μV) and slope (-0.004 to 0.023 μV/dB) suggested that the sample included participants with varying degrees of HHL of uncertain etiology (idiopathic). However, adaptation was not correlated with the wave I amplitude or slope, even after accounting for the potential confounding effect of elevated hearing thresholds in an extended frequency range.</div><div>Findings suggest that adaptation to noise in speech recognition is greater at higher noise levels but provide no evidence that idiopathic HHL leads to reduced adaptation to noise in humans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"464 ","pages":"Article 109321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037859552500139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adaptation to noise refers to the improvement in word-in-noise recognition as words are delayed a few hundred milliseconds in the noise. This adaptation is thought to reflect adjustments of the dynamic range of auditory neurons to the most frequent noise level. Evidence from a mouse model suggests that hidden hearing loss (HHL), a diminished auditory nerve response without a hearing loss, selectively impairs neural dynamic range adaptation to loud sound environments. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether HHL is associated with poor behavioral adaptation to loud noise in speech recognition.
For 89 people (aged 19–86 years) with clinically normal hearing, we measured speech reception thresholds (SRTs; signal-to-noise ratios at 50 % recognition) for disyllabic words in stationary, speech-shaped noise. SRTs were measured for words delayed 50 and 800 ms in the noise and for noise levels of 55 and 78 dB SPL. Adaptation was calculated as the SRT improvement in the long-delay relative to the short-delay condition. Because adaptation is greater for vocoded than for natural words, words were processed through a tone vocoder. The response of the auditory nerve was assessed using the amplitude of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I and the rate of growth (slope) of the wave I amplitude with increasing stimulus level.
Adaptation occurred at the two noise levels but was greater for the louder noise than for the softer noise (2.3 dB vs 1.3 dB, respectively). This happened because SRTs were worse for the louder noise in the short but not in the long delay condition. The large variability in ABR wave I amplitude (0.10 to 0.54 μV) and slope (-0.004 to 0.023 μV/dB) suggested that the sample included participants with varying degrees of HHL of uncertain etiology (idiopathic). However, adaptation was not correlated with the wave I amplitude or slope, even after accounting for the potential confounding effect of elevated hearing thresholds in an extended frequency range.
Findings suggest that adaptation to noise in speech recognition is greater at higher noise levels but provide no evidence that idiopathic HHL leads to reduced adaptation to noise in humans.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.