The effect of minimum volume recommendations on surgeon activity for first revision total knee replacement: an analysis of 2009–2019 United Kingdom National Joint Registry data
Alexander H. Matthews , William K. Gray , Jonathan P. Evans , Jonathan T. Evans , Tim Briggs , Shiraz A. Sabah , Andrew Price , Andrew D. Toms
{"title":"The effect of minimum volume recommendations on surgeon activity for first revision total knee replacement: an analysis of 2009–2019 United Kingdom National Joint Registry data","authors":"Alexander H. Matthews , William K. Gray , Jonathan P. Evans , Jonathan T. Evans , Tim Briggs , Shiraz A. Sabah , Andrew Price , Andrew D. Toms","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate changes in first time revision knee replacement (RevKR) volumes following the publication of a report identifying low surgeon volumes in England. As a secondary aim we sought to investigate the rate of accrual of volumes for early career surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This population-based cohort study used data from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry. Patients undergoing first time RevKR between 1st January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Annual revision volumes for each surgeon were calculated and trends in surgeon volumes plotted as medians and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Data before and after the report was compared. The rate of accrual of experience for new surgeons inclusive of both first-time revisions and re-revisions was calculated and adjusted for unit volume.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21,067 patients were included. Over the whole study period, 123/1433 (8.58%) of surgeons achieved a mean annual volume of 15 or more revisions. Temporal trends in surgeon revision volumes observed an increase for non-acute indications. New surgeons in lower volume units have 42% lower chance of reaching 15 operations per year compared to those in the highest volume units (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We observed an increase in surgeon volumes following the report in first time non acute RevKRs. New RevKR surgeons were more likely to achieve and maintain revision volume targets in higher volume centres, this supports the drive for dual consultant operating and prospective revision knee consultants being appointed to highest volume units.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025001218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The aim of this study was to investigate changes in first time revision knee replacement (RevKR) volumes following the publication of a report identifying low surgeon volumes in England. As a secondary aim we sought to investigate the rate of accrual of volumes for early career surgeons.
Methods
This population-based cohort study used data from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry. Patients undergoing first time RevKR between 1st January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Annual revision volumes for each surgeon were calculated and trends in surgeon volumes plotted as medians and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Data before and after the report was compared. The rate of accrual of experience for new surgeons inclusive of both first-time revisions and re-revisions was calculated and adjusted for unit volume.
Results
A total of 21,067 patients were included. Over the whole study period, 123/1433 (8.58%) of surgeons achieved a mean annual volume of 15 or more revisions. Temporal trends in surgeon revision volumes observed an increase for non-acute indications. New surgeons in lower volume units have 42% lower chance of reaching 15 operations per year compared to those in the highest volume units (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.83).
Conclusions
We observed an increase in surgeon volumes following the report in first time non acute RevKRs. New RevKR surgeons were more likely to achieve and maintain revision volume targets in higher volume centres, this supports the drive for dual consultant operating and prospective revision knee consultants being appointed to highest volume units.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.