Climate walking: A comparison study of mobile weather stations and their relevance for urban planning, design, human health and well-being

IF 3.9 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
T. Silva , R. Ramusga , M. Matias , J. Amaro , A. Bonifácio , C. Reis , A. Chokhachian , G. Lopes , A. Almeida , J. Frazão , J. Vasconcelos , A. Lopes , P. Morgado
{"title":"Climate walking: A comparison study of mobile weather stations and their relevance for urban planning, design, human health and well-being","authors":"T. Silva ,&nbsp;R. Ramusga ,&nbsp;M. Matias ,&nbsp;J. Amaro ,&nbsp;A. Bonifácio ,&nbsp;C. Reis ,&nbsp;A. Chokhachian ,&nbsp;G. Lopes ,&nbsp;A. Almeida ,&nbsp;J. Frazão ,&nbsp;J. Vasconcelos ,&nbsp;A. Lopes ,&nbsp;P. Morgado","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microclimate conditions affect the outdoor urban way of life for humans. These conditions directly impact people’s health and well-being, such as access to medical care or a healthy lifestyle. Human thermal comfort is paramount for people’s health, both physical and mental. In this paper, the study compares two microclimate mobile weather stations (MWS) based on a set of users’-based assessment criteria (usability, user-friendliness, sensors) and thermal comfort (UTCI) results accuracy. The comparison was carried out through continuous mobile transect measurements lasting an hour and a half, conducted on two summer days in Lisbon across distinct urban morphological settings. This research was developed to assist future researchers in urban climatology with the design of microscale studies, particularly in relation to equipment selection, performance assessment, and methodological procedures. In terms of performance, we found the RMSE to be 1.3 °C for air temperature, 1.6 % for relative humidity, 1.3 m/s for wind speed, and 8.4 W/m2 for solar radiation for MWS 1, and 1.5 °C for air temperature, 2.9 % for relative humidity, 1.5 m/s for wind speed, and 11.6 W/m2 for radiation for MWS 2. Both MWS units exhibited a consistent performance, however, MWS 1 demonstrated greater overall accuracy, particularly in the measurement of air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. Differences were also observed between the sensors of MWS 1 and MWS 2, as well as in the MWS usability, factors which may be significant depending on the users’ objectives and available resources. Despite this, both MWS units were deemed suitable for deployment in urban environments, with MWS 2 offering a more intuitive user experience. The findings of this study are particularly relevant for those beginning mobile meteorological measurements, as well as for researchers aiming to address urban heat stress and enhance public well-being and thermal comfort through their work. However, the study is limited by its short duration and geographic scope, and further research is needed to expand its applicability to diverse urban settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microclimate conditions affect the outdoor urban way of life for humans. These conditions directly impact people’s health and well-being, such as access to medical care or a healthy lifestyle. Human thermal comfort is paramount for people’s health, both physical and mental. In this paper, the study compares two microclimate mobile weather stations (MWS) based on a set of users’-based assessment criteria (usability, user-friendliness, sensors) and thermal comfort (UTCI) results accuracy. The comparison was carried out through continuous mobile transect measurements lasting an hour and a half, conducted on two summer days in Lisbon across distinct urban morphological settings. This research was developed to assist future researchers in urban climatology with the design of microscale studies, particularly in relation to equipment selection, performance assessment, and methodological procedures. In terms of performance, we found the RMSE to be 1.3 °C for air temperature, 1.6 % for relative humidity, 1.3 m/s for wind speed, and 8.4 W/m2 for solar radiation for MWS 1, and 1.5 °C for air temperature, 2.9 % for relative humidity, 1.5 m/s for wind speed, and 11.6 W/m2 for radiation for MWS 2. Both MWS units exhibited a consistent performance, however, MWS 1 demonstrated greater overall accuracy, particularly in the measurement of air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. Differences were also observed between the sensors of MWS 1 and MWS 2, as well as in the MWS usability, factors which may be significant depending on the users’ objectives and available resources. Despite this, both MWS units were deemed suitable for deployment in urban environments, with MWS 2 offering a more intuitive user experience. The findings of this study are particularly relevant for those beginning mobile meteorological measurements, as well as for researchers aiming to address urban heat stress and enhance public well-being and thermal comfort through their work. However, the study is limited by its short duration and geographic scope, and further research is needed to expand its applicability to diverse urban settings.
气候行走:移动气象站的比较研究及其与城市规划、设计、人类健康和福祉的相关性
小气候条件影响着人类的户外城市生活方式。这些情况直接影响人们的健康和福祉,例如获得医疗保健或健康的生活方式。人体热舒适对人们的身心健康至关重要。本文基于一套基于用户的评价标准(可用性、用户友好性、传感器)和热舒适(UTCI)结果精度,对两种微气候移动气象站(MWS)进行了比较。比较是通过持续一个半小时的连续移动样带测量进行的,在里斯本的两个夏天,在不同的城市形态设置中进行。这项研究旨在帮助未来城市气候学研究人员设计微尺度研究,特别是在设备选择、性能评估和方法程序方面。在性能方面,我们发现MWS 1的空气温度RMSE为1.3°C,相对湿度为1.6%,风速为1.3 m/s,太阳辐射为8.4 W/m2, MWS 2的空气温度RMSE为1.5°C,相对湿度为2.9%,风速为1.5 m/s,辐射为11.6 W/m2。两个MWS设备表现出一致的性能,然而,MWS 1表现出更高的整体精度,特别是在测量空气温度、相对湿度和风速方面。我们还观察到MWS 1和MWS 2的传感器之间的差异,以及MWS可用性方面的差异,这些因素可能取决于用户的目标和可用资源。尽管如此,两个MWS单元都被认为适合在城市环境中部署,MWS 2提供了更直观的用户体验。这项研究的发现对于那些开始移动气象测量的人,以及旨在通过他们的工作解决城市热压力和提高公众福祉和热舒适的研究人员来说尤其重要。然而,由于研究时间短,地理范围有限,需要进一步研究以扩大其对不同城市环境的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信