Single-port video-assisted laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using operative endoscope or SILS™ device in dogs

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Caio de Faria Tiosso , Fabiana Azevedo Voorwald , Maurício Veloso Brun , Bárbara Gonçalves Barbosa , Beatriz Ibrahim Miranda Antunes , Roberta Martins Crivelaro , Roberto Thiesen , Marco Augusto Machado Silva , Wilter Ricardo Russiano Vicente
{"title":"Single-port video-assisted laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using operative endoscope or SILS™ device in dogs","authors":"Caio de Faria Tiosso ,&nbsp;Fabiana Azevedo Voorwald ,&nbsp;Maurício Veloso Brun ,&nbsp;Bárbara Gonçalves Barbosa ,&nbsp;Beatriz Ibrahim Miranda Antunes ,&nbsp;Roberta Martins Crivelaro ,&nbsp;Roberto Thiesen ,&nbsp;Marco Augusto Machado Silva ,&nbsp;Wilter Ricardo Russiano Vicente","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the last few years, minimally invasive surgery has gained increasing recognition in various veterinary fields because of its advantages over conventional surgery. This progress has stimulated the development of new instruments with potential applications in veterinary medicine. This randomized controlled study was performed to evaluate two different single-port techniques for performing video-assisted ovariohysterectomy in female dogs, comparing them with the conventional approach. Thirty female dogs (<em>n</em> = 30) were evaluated and divided into 3 groups of 10 animals each: ovariohysterectomy by celiotomy, video-assisted laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using a single-port operative endoscope, and laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using the single-incision laparoscopic surgery device. The mean surgical time, complications, postoperative pain levels, and serum levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were assessed. Both video-assisted techniques demonstrated high feasibility and satisfactory clinical outcomes, although minor complications were observed (4 in the operative endoscope group and 3 in the single-incision laparoscopic surgery device group). The interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels peaked earlier, at 12 and 24 h postoperatively, respectively. The higher pain scores observed in animals undergoing ovariohysterectomy by celiotomy indicate that pain in ovariohysterectomy procedures is directly related to visceral manipulation and traction of the ovarian pedicle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 105704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882500178X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last few years, minimally invasive surgery has gained increasing recognition in various veterinary fields because of its advantages over conventional surgery. This progress has stimulated the development of new instruments with potential applications in veterinary medicine. This randomized controlled study was performed to evaluate two different single-port techniques for performing video-assisted ovariohysterectomy in female dogs, comparing them with the conventional approach. Thirty female dogs (n = 30) were evaluated and divided into 3 groups of 10 animals each: ovariohysterectomy by celiotomy, video-assisted laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using a single-port operative endoscope, and laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy using the single-incision laparoscopic surgery device. The mean surgical time, complications, postoperative pain levels, and serum levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were assessed. Both video-assisted techniques demonstrated high feasibility and satisfactory clinical outcomes, although minor complications were observed (4 in the operative endoscope group and 3 in the single-incision laparoscopic surgery device group). The interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels peaked earlier, at 12 and 24 h postoperatively, respectively. The higher pain scores observed in animals undergoing ovariohysterectomy by celiotomy indicate that pain in ovariohysterectomy procedures is directly related to visceral manipulation and traction of the ovarian pedicle.
应用手术内窥镜或SILS™装置进行犬单孔视频辅助腹腔镜卵巢子宫切除术
在过去的几年里,微创手术由于其优于传统手术的优点,在各个兽医领域得到了越来越多的认可。这一进展刺激了在兽医学中具有潜在应用的新仪器的开发。本随机对照研究评估了两种不同的单端口技术对雌性犬进行视频辅助卵巢子宫切除术,并将其与传统方法进行比较。30只雌性犬(n = 30)被分为3组,每组10只,分别为腹腔切开卵巢子宫切除术、单孔手术内窥镜视频辅助腹腔镜卵巢子宫切除术和单切口腹腔镜手术装置腹腔镜卵巢子宫切除术。评估平均手术时间、并发症、术后疼痛程度、血清c反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6水平。两种视频辅助技术均表现出较高的可行性和满意的临床结果,尽管观察到轻微的并发症(手术内窥镜组4例,单切口腹腔镜手术装置组3例)。白细胞介素-6和c反应蛋白水平较早达到峰值,分别在术后12和24小时。在接受卵巢子宫切除术的动物中观察到较高的疼痛评分,表明卵巢子宫切除术过程中的疼痛与内脏操作和卵巢蒂牵引直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信