Ines Rivelli , Rafael Hueso , Isabel Müller , Josef Hoermansperger , Iván Gaytán-Pérez , Maik Kinderman , David R. Yáñez-Ruiz
{"title":"Efficacy of 3-NOP applied in drinking water on enteric methane reduction in sheep","authors":"Ines Rivelli , Rafael Hueso , Isabel Müller , Josef Hoermansperger , Iván Gaytán-Pérez , Maik Kinderman , David R. Yáñez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The most effective strategy to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions is to incorporate CH<sub>4</sub> inhibitors into ruminant diets. However, there is a need to broaden the actual presentation form (i.e., solid powder) of the commercially available products to allow their use in grazing systems. This study aimed to test the efficacy of 3-NOP on enteric CH<sub>4</sub> reduction in sheep when applied in drinking water as a possible delivery system in livestock grazing conditions. The study followed a 4 × 4 Latin square design, enrolling 4 non-lactating female adult sheep with an average body weight (BW) of 44.9 ± 2.6 kg. The study lasted 8 weeks, with 4 experimental periods of 2 weeks each. The experimental periods consisted of 7 days of adaptation to the treatments and 3 days of enteric gas emission measurements (CH<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>) in open-circuit respiration chambers, followed by a wash-out period of 4 days. Sheep were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 experimental treatments. The treatments were: i) a basal diet without supplementation (CTL); ii) a basal diet supplemented with 80 mg of 3-NOP per kg of dry matter intake (DMI) (Bovaer® 10); iii) a basal diet supplemented with 80 mg of 3-NOP in the drinking water (DW80) per kg of DMI; and iv) a basal diet supplemented with 120 mg of 3-NOP in the drinking water (DW120) per kg of DMI. There were no significant differences (<em>P</em> > 0.05) in the feed or water intakes across treatments. Methane emissions (g/d) and yield (g/kg DMI) were significantly lower in Bovaer® 10 (-26.8 %), DW80 (-41.4 %), and DW120 (-35.7 %) than in CTL (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Sheep in the Bovaer® 10 treatment had a greater emissions reduction in the first 2 hours after feeding and a smaller reduction in the following 2 hours. In contrast to Bovaer® 10, the impact of treatments in DW80 and DW120 lasted for 4 hours post-feeding. For the second half of the day (i.e., 4 hours after the second feeding), Bovaer® 10, DW80, and DW120 had lower emission values than CTL. The lower emissions in sheep in DW80 and DW120 treatments than Bovaer® 10 is explained by their drinking pattern and, thereby, the supply of 3-NOP into the rumen. Results suggest that adding 3-NOP to the drinking water could be a potential strategy where feed formulation does not necessarily allow for the delivery of 3-NOP mixed with the diet. This strategy requires further research in livestock systems with different drinking water patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 116400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001956","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The most effective strategy to reduce CH4 emissions is to incorporate CH4 inhibitors into ruminant diets. However, there is a need to broaden the actual presentation form (i.e., solid powder) of the commercially available products to allow their use in grazing systems. This study aimed to test the efficacy of 3-NOP on enteric CH4 reduction in sheep when applied in drinking water as a possible delivery system in livestock grazing conditions. The study followed a 4 × 4 Latin square design, enrolling 4 non-lactating female adult sheep with an average body weight (BW) of 44.9 ± 2.6 kg. The study lasted 8 weeks, with 4 experimental periods of 2 weeks each. The experimental periods consisted of 7 days of adaptation to the treatments and 3 days of enteric gas emission measurements (CH4 and H2) in open-circuit respiration chambers, followed by a wash-out period of 4 days. Sheep were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 experimental treatments. The treatments were: i) a basal diet without supplementation (CTL); ii) a basal diet supplemented with 80 mg of 3-NOP per kg of dry matter intake (DMI) (Bovaer® 10); iii) a basal diet supplemented with 80 mg of 3-NOP in the drinking water (DW80) per kg of DMI; and iv) a basal diet supplemented with 120 mg of 3-NOP in the drinking water (DW120) per kg of DMI. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the feed or water intakes across treatments. Methane emissions (g/d) and yield (g/kg DMI) were significantly lower in Bovaer® 10 (-26.8 %), DW80 (-41.4 %), and DW120 (-35.7 %) than in CTL (P < 0.05). Sheep in the Bovaer® 10 treatment had a greater emissions reduction in the first 2 hours after feeding and a smaller reduction in the following 2 hours. In contrast to Bovaer® 10, the impact of treatments in DW80 and DW120 lasted for 4 hours post-feeding. For the second half of the day (i.e., 4 hours after the second feeding), Bovaer® 10, DW80, and DW120 had lower emission values than CTL. The lower emissions in sheep in DW80 and DW120 treatments than Bovaer® 10 is explained by their drinking pattern and, thereby, the supply of 3-NOP into the rumen. Results suggest that adding 3-NOP to the drinking water could be a potential strategy where feed formulation does not necessarily allow for the delivery of 3-NOP mixed with the diet. This strategy requires further research in livestock systems with different drinking water patterns.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.