Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.84905
George Bechir, Angelina Bechir
{"title":"Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices.","authors":"George Bechir, Angelina Bechir","doi":"10.7759/cureus.84905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Discharging patients with pending microbiology culture results from the hospital has become a common practice aimed at improving hospital throughput and reducing length of stay. One of the main contributors to prolonged hospitalization is the delay in receiving finalized culture results, especially when patients are clinically stable and ready for discharge. Consequently, many hospitals have explored strategies to safely discharge patients before culture results are finalized. While this approach may help alleviate bed shortages and reduce healthcare costs, it raises important patient safety concerns. Finalized culture results may reveal pathogens or resistance patterns that necessitate changes in antimicrobial therapy. Without timely review and action, these findings can lead to missed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment, or avoidable readmissions. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the safety, clinical impact, and system-level strategies associated with discharging patients with pending culture results. Studies show that 2%-11% of pending cultures in hospitalized patients require a change in clinical management, yet documentation of these pending results is often missing from discharge summaries, and follow-up responsibility is frequently unclear. Vulnerable populations, such as older adults and those discharged to subacute care facilities, are particularly at risk due to fragmented transitions and limited outpatient monitoring. Adverse outcomes in these groups include delayed therapy adjustments, inappropriate antimicrobial use, and increased healthcare utilization. To address these risks, several interventions have shown promise. These include electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts, pharmacist-led stewardship programs, and auto-populated discharge summary tools. When integrated into standardized discharge workflows and supported by institutional policy, these interventions improve follow-up rates and reduce harm. Systematic reviews of hospital discharge practices emphasize that multidisciplinary approaches, combining clinical teams, pharmacists, and care transition services, are most effective in ensuring timely review and response to finalized results. In conclusion, discharging patients with pending microbiology cultures can be safe when supported by structured systems that ensure results are reviewed and acted upon after discharge. Hospitals should implement protocols that clearly document pending tests, assign follow-up responsibility, and utilize EHR tools to facilitate communication. These strategies enhance both patient safety and operational efficiency during the vulnerable transition from inpatient to outpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 5","pages":"e84905"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discharging patients with pending microbiology culture results from the hospital has become a common practice aimed at improving hospital throughput and reducing length of stay. One of the main contributors to prolonged hospitalization is the delay in receiving finalized culture results, especially when patients are clinically stable and ready for discharge. Consequently, many hospitals have explored strategies to safely discharge patients before culture results are finalized. While this approach may help alleviate bed shortages and reduce healthcare costs, it raises important patient safety concerns. Finalized culture results may reveal pathogens or resistance patterns that necessitate changes in antimicrobial therapy. Without timely review and action, these findings can lead to missed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment, or avoidable readmissions. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the safety, clinical impact, and system-level strategies associated with discharging patients with pending culture results. Studies show that 2%-11% of pending cultures in hospitalized patients require a change in clinical management, yet documentation of these pending results is often missing from discharge summaries, and follow-up responsibility is frequently unclear. Vulnerable populations, such as older adults and those discharged to subacute care facilities, are particularly at risk due to fragmented transitions and limited outpatient monitoring. Adverse outcomes in these groups include delayed therapy adjustments, inappropriate antimicrobial use, and increased healthcare utilization. To address these risks, several interventions have shown promise. These include electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts, pharmacist-led stewardship programs, and auto-populated discharge summary tools. When integrated into standardized discharge workflows and supported by institutional policy, these interventions improve follow-up rates and reduce harm. Systematic reviews of hospital discharge practices emphasize that multidisciplinary approaches, combining clinical teams, pharmacists, and care transition services, are most effective in ensuring timely review and response to finalized results. In conclusion, discharging patients with pending microbiology cultures can be safe when supported by structured systems that ensure results are reviewed and acted upon after discharge. Hospitals should implement protocols that clearly document pending tests, assign follow-up responsibility, and utilize EHR tools to facilitate communication. These strategies enhance both patient safety and operational efficiency during the vulnerable transition from inpatient to outpatient care.

出院待定微生物培养的患者:安全性和最佳实践的叙述性回顾。
将微生物培养结果尚未确定的患者从医院出院已成为一种常见的做法,旨在提高医院的吞吐量和缩短住院时间。住院时间延长的主要原因之一是收到最终培养结果的延迟,特别是当患者临床稳定并准备出院时。因此,许多医院已经探索了在培养结果最终确定之前安全出院的策略。虽然这种方法可能有助于缓解床位短缺和降低医疗成本,但它引起了重要的患者安全问题。最终的培养结果可能揭示病原体或耐药性模式,需要改变抗菌药物治疗。如果不及时检查和采取行动,这些发现可能导致漏诊、治疗不理想或本可避免的再入院。这篇叙述性综述综合了目前关于安全性、临床影响和与未完成培养结果的患者出院相关的系统级策略的证据。研究表明,住院患者中2%-11%的待处理培养需要改变临床管理,但出院总结中往往缺少这些待处理结果的记录,随访责任往往不明确。脆弱人群,如老年人和那些出院到亚急性护理机构的人,由于分散的过渡和有限的门诊监测,尤其面临风险。这些组的不良后果包括延迟治疗调整、不适当的抗菌药物使用和医疗保健利用率增加。为了应对这些风险,一些干预措施显示出了希望。这些工具包括基于电子健康记录(EHR)的警报、药剂师领导的管理计划和自动填充出院摘要工具。如果将这些干预措施纳入标准化的出院工作流程并得到机构政策的支持,这些干预措施将提高随访率并减少伤害。出院实践的系统回顾强调多学科方法,结合临床团队、药剂师和护理过渡服务,是确保及时回顾和对最终结果作出反应的最有效方法。总之,如果有结构化的系统支持,确保出院后对结果进行审查并采取行动,待进行微生物培养的患者出院是安全的。医院应实施协议,明确记录待进行的测试,分配后续责任,并利用电子病历工具促进沟通。这些策略在从住院到门诊护理的脆弱过渡期间提高了患者安全和操作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信