Assessment of the performance of early warning scores in patients with COVID-19.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0371en
Victoria Castilho Bartolomeu, Luiz Humberto Vieri Piacezzi, Karina Aparecida Lopes da Costa, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes
{"title":"Assessment of the performance of early warning scores in patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Victoria Castilho Bartolomeu, Luiz Humberto Vieri Piacezzi, Karina Aparecida Lopes da Costa, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0371en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of the early warning scores Modified Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, National Early Warning Score Age and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment for identifying clinical deteriorations in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort study. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. Clinical deteriorations were acute respiratory failure, shock and cardiorespiratory arrest, and the outcomes were unscheduled admission to the Intensive Care Unit, discharge and death. The sensitivity and probability of a positive result in patients (true positive) and the specificity and probability of a negative result in non-patients (true negative) were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The National Early Warning Score 2 and the National Early Warning Score Age showed better sensitivity values for early identification of deteriorations and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NEWS 2 and NEWS A showed better sensitivity and specificity, and their use is recommended to support the clinical assessment of patients with COVID-19. This study contributes to healthcare practice by assessing scores that can improve clinical assessment, allowing rapid identification of signs of deterioration in patients affected by COVID-19 and early interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"59 ","pages":"e20240371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0371en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance of the early warning scores Modified Early Warning Score, National Early Warning Score 2, National Early Warning Score Age and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment for identifying clinical deteriorations in patients with COVID-19.

Method: A retrospective cohort study. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. Clinical deteriorations were acute respiratory failure, shock and cardiorespiratory arrest, and the outcomes were unscheduled admission to the Intensive Care Unit, discharge and death. The sensitivity and probability of a positive result in patients (true positive) and the specificity and probability of a negative result in non-patients (true negative) were determined.

Results: The National Early Warning Score 2 and the National Early Warning Score Age showed better sensitivity values for early identification of deteriorations and outcomes.

Conclusion: NEWS 2 and NEWS A showed better sensitivity and specificity, and their use is recommended to support the clinical assessment of patients with COVID-19. This study contributes to healthcare practice by assessing scores that can improve clinical assessment, allowing rapid identification of signs of deterioration in patients affected by COVID-19 and early interventions.

COVID-19患者早期预警评分效果评估
目的:评价改进预警评分、国家预警评分2、国家预警评分年龄和快速脓毒症相关脏器功能衰竭评估对COVID-19患者临床恶化的识别作用。方法:回顾性队列研究。纳入确诊为COVID-19的患者。临床恶化为急性呼吸衰竭、休克和心肺骤停,结果为非预定入住重症监护病房、出院和死亡。测定患者阳性结果(真阳性)的敏感性和概率,非患者阴性结果(真阴性)的特异性和概率。结果:国家早期预警评分2和国家早期预警评分年龄对早期识别病情恶化和预后具有更好的敏感性。结论:NEWS 2和NEWS A具有较好的敏感性和特异性,可用于支持COVID-19患者的临床评估。该研究通过评估评分来改善临床评估,从而快速识别受COVID-19影响的患者的恶化迹象并进行早期干预,从而为医疗保健实践做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信