Clinical outcome of OviTex reinforced tissue matrix in hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Qatar Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5339/qmj.2025.22
Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Seif B Altahtamouni, Kalpana Singh, Omar M Aboumarzouk, Mohamed Elakkad
{"title":"Clinical outcome of OviTex reinforced tissue matrix in hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Seif B Altahtamouni, Kalpana Singh, Omar M Aboumarzouk, Mohamed Elakkad","doi":"10.5339/qmj.2025.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This review provides a comprehensive and current overview of the clinical outcomes associated with the use of OviTex reinforced tissue matrix (RTM) in hernia repair. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search included research publications related to clinical outcomes involving the use of OviTex RTM in hernia repair up to August 2023. We extensively examined and extracted relevant data from databases such as Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. The meta-analysis included comparisons related to body mass index (BMI) in hernia treatment, primary abdominal wall hernias treated with OviTex, and other relevant factors. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) scale. Our systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42023456009. <b>Results:</b> A total of 9 observational studies involving 990 patients from three countries (USA, Netherlands, and Germany) were included in our study. Pooled results show that the risk of the OviTex group was lower than that of the comparison group (pooled risk ratio (RR) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.05; <i>Z</i> = -1.514; <i>p</i> = 0.13). The prevalence rate of primary abdominal wall hernia among the included studies ranged from a minimum of 43% (95% CI: 30-58) to a maximum of 81% (95% CI: 64-91%), the risk was not significantly higher in the comparison group compared with the OviTex group (pooled RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.29-4.30; <i>Z</i> = 0.155; <i>p</i> = 0.877), the prevalence of laparoscopic surgery was 12% (95% CI: 6-19%), the BMI was favorable in the comparison group but was not statistically significant (mean difference = 25; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.52; <i>p</i> = 0.073). <b>Conclusion:</b> OviTex RTM has shown promising outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction and hernia repair. However, it is crucial to conduct further research and clinical studies to confirm these findings and unlock the capabilities of OviTex across different medical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":53667,"journal":{"name":"Qatar Medical Journal","volume":"2025 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qatar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This review provides a comprehensive and current overview of the clinical outcomes associated with the use of OviTex reinforced tissue matrix (RTM) in hernia repair. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search included research publications related to clinical outcomes involving the use of OviTex RTM in hernia repair up to August 2023. We extensively examined and extracted relevant data from databases such as Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. The meta-analysis included comparisons related to body mass index (BMI) in hernia treatment, primary abdominal wall hernias treated with OviTex, and other relevant factors. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) scale. Our systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42023456009. Results: A total of 9 observational studies involving 990 patients from three countries (USA, Netherlands, and Germany) were included in our study. Pooled results show that the risk of the OviTex group was lower than that of the comparison group (pooled risk ratio (RR) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.05; Z = -1.514; p = 0.13). The prevalence rate of primary abdominal wall hernia among the included studies ranged from a minimum of 43% (95% CI: 30-58) to a maximum of 81% (95% CI: 64-91%), the risk was not significantly higher in the comparison group compared with the OviTex group (pooled RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.29-4.30; Z = 0.155; p = 0.877), the prevalence of laparoscopic surgery was 12% (95% CI: 6-19%), the BMI was favorable in the comparison group but was not statistically significant (mean difference = 25; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.52; p = 0.073). Conclusion: OviTex RTM has shown promising outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction and hernia repair. However, it is crucial to conduct further research and clinical studies to confirm these findings and unlock the capabilities of OviTex across different medical scenarios.

OviTex增强组织基质在疝修补中的临床效果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:本文综述了OviTex增强组织基质(OviTex reinforced tissue matrix, RTM)用于疝修补的临床结果。方法:我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了截至2023年8月与使用OviTex RTM进行疝修补的临床结果相关的研究出版物。我们从Embase、PubMed和Scopus等数据库中广泛检查并提取相关数据。荟萃分析包括比较疝治疗中的体重指数(BMI)、OviTex治疗的原发性腹壁疝以及其他相关因素。纳入研究的质量采用未成年人(非随机研究方法学指数)量表进行评估。我们的系统评价方案已在PROSPERO(国际前瞻性系统评价注册系统)注册,注册号为CRD42023456009。结果:我们的研究共纳入了9项观察性研究,涉及来自3个国家(美国、荷兰和德国)的990名患者。合并结果显示,OviTex组的风险低于对照组(合并风险比(RR) = 0.84;95%置信区间(CI): 0.67-1.05;z = -1.514;p = 0.13)。在纳入的研究中,原发性腹壁疝的患病率从最低的43% (95% CI: 30-58)到最高的81% (95% CI: 64-91%)不等,与OviTex组相比,对照组的风险没有显著增加(合并RR = 1.11;95% ci: 0.29-4.30;z = 0.155;p = 0.877),腹腔镜手术患病率为12% (95% CI: 6-19%),对照组BMI较好,但差异无统计学意义(平均差异= 25;95% ci: -0.02, 0.52;p = 0.073)。结论:OviTex RTM在腹壁重建和疝修补中具有良好的效果。然而,进行进一步的研究和临床研究以证实这些发现并解锁OviTex在不同医疗场景中的能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qatar Medical Journal
Qatar Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信