The Group Interview as a Method of Efficient Hiring: The Experience of a Regional Medical School Campus.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Matthew McMillin, Peter Boedeker, Kammy Contreras, Stephen Charles
{"title":"The Group Interview as a Method of Efficient Hiring: The Experience of a Regional Medical School Campus.","authors":"Matthew McMillin, Peter Boedeker, Kammy Contreras, Stephen Charles","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>In 2020, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) established a regional campus in Temple, Texas (BCM-T), that required recruitment of multiple foundational sciences faculty members in a limited time frame. Group in-person interviews were used to fill these roles efficiently while promoting interaction between candidates and BCM faculty. This study assesses whether interviewing foundational sciences medical educators in a group setting can efficiently fill faculty positions, reducing time and financial costs while being perceived as fair and acceptable to the candidates.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Study participants were prospective foundational sciences faculty members who interviewed for a faculty position at BCM-T in a group interview setting between June 2022 and January 2023. Candidates were informed that several interviewees with differing areas of expertise would be present and that they were interviewing for multiple open positions, thus minimizing competitiveness. Individual interview components were candidate presentations and interviews, whereas meals and shared information presentations were in groups. After the positions were filled, candidates were given an anonymous electronic survey on interview impressions.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Interviews were completed in 4 days (decrease from the 10 days that would have been required if individual faculty interviews were used). Group interviews reduced interview-associated costs by approximately 50%. Interviewers reported that the interview format did not impact their ability to effectively evaluate and rank candidates. The anonymous electronic survey response rate was 60% (3 of 5 candidates). Survey results support that group interviews allowed candidates to communicate effectively, demonstrate competence, and promote fairness. All candidates indicated that they were satisfied with group interviews.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Future research could include a generalizability study to assess various facets to inform a decision study when applying the group interview method in a different context. Further validity evidence should be gathered, including long-term evaluation of the hiring decisions, before adoption elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem: In 2020, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) established a regional campus in Temple, Texas (BCM-T), that required recruitment of multiple foundational sciences faculty members in a limited time frame. Group in-person interviews were used to fill these roles efficiently while promoting interaction between candidates and BCM faculty. This study assesses whether interviewing foundational sciences medical educators in a group setting can efficiently fill faculty positions, reducing time and financial costs while being perceived as fair and acceptable to the candidates.

Approach: Study participants were prospective foundational sciences faculty members who interviewed for a faculty position at BCM-T in a group interview setting between June 2022 and January 2023. Candidates were informed that several interviewees with differing areas of expertise would be present and that they were interviewing for multiple open positions, thus minimizing competitiveness. Individual interview components were candidate presentations and interviews, whereas meals and shared information presentations were in groups. After the positions were filled, candidates were given an anonymous electronic survey on interview impressions.

Outcomes: Interviews were completed in 4 days (decrease from the 10 days that would have been required if individual faculty interviews were used). Group interviews reduced interview-associated costs by approximately 50%. Interviewers reported that the interview format did not impact their ability to effectively evaluate and rank candidates. The anonymous electronic survey response rate was 60% (3 of 5 candidates). Survey results support that group interviews allowed candidates to communicate effectively, demonstrate competence, and promote fairness. All candidates indicated that they were satisfied with group interviews.

Next steps: Future research could include a generalizability study to assess various facets to inform a decision study when applying the group interview method in a different context. Further validity evidence should be gathered, including long-term evaluation of the hiring decisions, before adoption elsewhere.

小组面试作为一种有效的招聘方法:一个地区医学院校园的经验。
问题:2020年,贝勒医学院(BCM)在德克萨斯州坦普尔建立了一个区域校区(BCM- t),这需要在有限的时间内招聘多名基础科学教职员工。小组面对面的面试被用来有效地填补这些角色,同时促进候选人和BCM教师之间的互动。本研究评估了在小组环境中面试基础科学医学教育工作者是否能有效地填补教师职位,减少时间和财务成本,同时被候选人认为是公平和可接受的。方法:研究参与者是在2022年6月至2023年1月期间参加BCM-T教师职位面试的潜在基础科学教师。候选人被告知,将有几位具有不同专业领域的面试者在场,他们将面试多个空缺职位,从而最大限度地降低竞争力。个人面试的组成部分是候选人的陈述和面试,而聚餐和共享信息的陈述是分组的。在职位被填满后,候选人会收到一份关于面试印象的匿名电子调查。结果:访谈在4天内完成(如果使用个别教师访谈,则需要10天)。小组面试减少了大约50%的面试相关成本。面试官报告说,面试形式并没有影响他们有效评估和排名候选人的能力。匿名电子调查的回复率为60%(5名候选人中有3名)。调查结果支持小组面试允许候选人有效沟通,展示能力,促进公平。所有候选人都表示对小组面试感到满意。下一步:未来的研究可能包括一项概括性研究,以评估在不同背景下应用小组访谈方法时的各个方面,为决策研究提供信息。在其他地方采用之前,应收集进一步的有效性证据,包括对雇用决定的长期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信