{"title":"Studying the Processing of Multimodal Brief Temporal Intervals with an Equisection (Bisection) Task.","authors":"Antoine Demers, Simon Grondin","doi":"10.1163/22134808-bja10148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies have investigated the influence of auditory and visual sensory modalities on the variability and perceived duration of brief time intervals. However, few studies have investigated this influence when the two intervals to be discriminated share the same stimulus, and none of these have included the tactile modality. The aim of the present study was to investigate, in multimodal conditions, the capability to discriminate two adjacent intervals, using an equisection and adjustment method. Participants had to adjust the second of three brief successive signals marking two empty intervals until they were subjectively perceived as equal. The experiment included nine modality conditions and intervals between Markers 1 and 3 lasted 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2 s (four standard conditions). The results show that the adjustment is better (lower variability) with three auditory (A) than with three visual (V) or tactile (T) markers, and these three conditions are better than when Marker 2 differs from Markers 1 and 3 (all intermodal conditions). Differences also emerged in the perceived duration of intermodal conditions. In TVT and VTV conditions, intervals marked by a tactile-visual (TV) sequence are perceived as longer than VT intervals, and in AVA and VAV conditions AV intervals are perceived as longer than VA intervals. Finally, AT intervals are perceived as longer than TA intervals, but only in the short standard conditions. In addition to replicating the classical variability increase when short intermodal intervals are used, the study shows the influence on perceived duration of the speed of processing of a visual signal.</p>","PeriodicalId":51298,"journal":{"name":"Multisensory Research","volume":" ","pages":"77-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multisensory Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several studies have investigated the influence of auditory and visual sensory modalities on the variability and perceived duration of brief time intervals. However, few studies have investigated this influence when the two intervals to be discriminated share the same stimulus, and none of these have included the tactile modality. The aim of the present study was to investigate, in multimodal conditions, the capability to discriminate two adjacent intervals, using an equisection and adjustment method. Participants had to adjust the second of three brief successive signals marking two empty intervals until they were subjectively perceived as equal. The experiment included nine modality conditions and intervals between Markers 1 and 3 lasted 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2 s (four standard conditions). The results show that the adjustment is better (lower variability) with three auditory (A) than with three visual (V) or tactile (T) markers, and these three conditions are better than when Marker 2 differs from Markers 1 and 3 (all intermodal conditions). Differences also emerged in the perceived duration of intermodal conditions. In TVT and VTV conditions, intervals marked by a tactile-visual (TV) sequence are perceived as longer than VT intervals, and in AVA and VAV conditions AV intervals are perceived as longer than VA intervals. Finally, AT intervals are perceived as longer than TA intervals, but only in the short standard conditions. In addition to replicating the classical variability increase when short intermodal intervals are used, the study shows the influence on perceived duration of the speed of processing of a visual signal.
期刊介绍:
Multisensory Research is an interdisciplinary archival journal covering all aspects of multisensory processing including the control of action, cognition and attention. Research using any approach to increase our understanding of multisensory perceptual, behavioural, neural and computational mechanisms is encouraged. Empirical, neurophysiological, psychophysical, brain imaging, clinical, developmental, mathematical and computational analyses are welcome. Research will also be considered covering multisensory applications such as sensory substitution, crossmodal methods for delivering sensory information or multisensory approaches to robotics and engineering. Short communications and technical notes that draw attention to new developments will be included, as will reviews and commentaries on current issues. Special issues dealing with specific topics will be announced from time to time. Multisensory Research is a continuation of Seeing and Perceiving, and of Spatial Vision.