Prevalence of Doravirine Resistance Mutations in a Large-Scale HIV-1 Transmitted Drug Resistance Survey in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.3390/v17050731
Diego Cecchini, Isabel Cassetti, Florencia Scarnato, Agustina Fiori, Jimena Nuevo, Clara Villaverde, Adriana Sucari, María C Torroija, Emiliano Bissio, Gabriela Bugarin, Gustavo Lopardo
{"title":"Prevalence of Doravirine Resistance Mutations in a Large-Scale HIV-1 Transmitted Drug Resistance Survey in Buenos Aires, Argentina.","authors":"Diego Cecchini, Isabel Cassetti, Florencia Scarnato, Agustina Fiori, Jimena Nuevo, Clara Villaverde, Adriana Sucari, María C Torroija, Emiliano Bissio, Gabriela Bugarin, Gustavo Lopardo","doi":"10.3390/v17050731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Argentina has reported moderate to high levels of transmitted drug resistance in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), mostly to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Doravirine (DOR) has a unique resistance profile and retains potent antiviral activity in the presence of the most prevalent NNRTI-associated resistant viruses. Scarce data exist regarding the frequency of DOR resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in Latin America. We describe the prevalence of DOR RAMs in samples from adults PLWHA in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in the context of a survey of transmitted drug resistance (TDR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was undertaken utilizing samples collected between 2017 and 2021 at two reference HIV clinics. Samples were analyzed for RAMs using the World Health Organization (WHO) mutation list. Mutations to DOR were assessed with the Stanford and Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) algorithms. Rilpivirine (RPV) RAMs were assessed using the Stanford algorithm. Susceptibility to NNRTIs was evaluated using the HIVdb Program with Stanford and ANRS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Samples from 1667 PLWHA were analyzed: 81.2% were male, with 52.6% identifying as men who have sex with men. According to the WHO list, the overall TDR was 12.1% (<i>n</i> = 203). The prevalence of RAMs was 10.1% (170/1667) for NNRTIs, 4% (67/1667) for nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and 1.7% (30/1667) for protease inhibitors (PIs). The most frequent NNRTI mutations were K103N (5.6%), G190A (0.89%), and K103S (0.77%). The prevalence of DOR RAMs was <2%, with the most common being Y188L (0.53%). Rilpivirine RAM prevalence was 6%. Susceptibility to DOR, RPV, efavirenz, and nevirapine as given by the Stanford algorithm was 97.4%, 92%, 91.4%, and 90.4%, respectively. The ANRS criteria yielded susceptibility rates of 98.3%, 93.3%, 92.3%, and 90.8%, respectively. Regarding NRTIs, thymidine analog mutations (including T215 revertants) were the most frequent RAMs. Among PIs, the most prevalent RAMs were M46L (0.47%) and V82A (0.35%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows the persistence of moderate to high levels of resistance to first-generation NNRTIs. Despite this, prevalence was low for DOR. Surveillance of TDR remains critical for recommendations of ART initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Argentina has reported moderate to high levels of transmitted drug resistance in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), mostly to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Doravirine (DOR) has a unique resistance profile and retains potent antiviral activity in the presence of the most prevalent NNRTI-associated resistant viruses. Scarce data exist regarding the frequency of DOR resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in Latin America. We describe the prevalence of DOR RAMs in samples from adults PLWHA in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in the context of a survey of transmitted drug resistance (TDR).

Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken utilizing samples collected between 2017 and 2021 at two reference HIV clinics. Samples were analyzed for RAMs using the World Health Organization (WHO) mutation list. Mutations to DOR were assessed with the Stanford and Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) algorithms. Rilpivirine (RPV) RAMs were assessed using the Stanford algorithm. Susceptibility to NNRTIs was evaluated using the HIVdb Program with Stanford and ANRS criteria.

Results: Samples from 1667 PLWHA were analyzed: 81.2% were male, with 52.6% identifying as men who have sex with men. According to the WHO list, the overall TDR was 12.1% (n = 203). The prevalence of RAMs was 10.1% (170/1667) for NNRTIs, 4% (67/1667) for nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and 1.7% (30/1667) for protease inhibitors (PIs). The most frequent NNRTI mutations were K103N (5.6%), G190A (0.89%), and K103S (0.77%). The prevalence of DOR RAMs was <2%, with the most common being Y188L (0.53%). Rilpivirine RAM prevalence was 6%. Susceptibility to DOR, RPV, efavirenz, and nevirapine as given by the Stanford algorithm was 97.4%, 92%, 91.4%, and 90.4%, respectively. The ANRS criteria yielded susceptibility rates of 98.3%, 93.3%, 92.3%, and 90.8%, respectively. Regarding NRTIs, thymidine analog mutations (including T215 revertants) were the most frequent RAMs. Among PIs, the most prevalent RAMs were M46L (0.47%) and V82A (0.35%).

Conclusions: Our study shows the persistence of moderate to high levels of resistance to first-generation NNRTIs. Despite this, prevalence was low for DOR. Surveillance of TDR remains critical for recommendations of ART initiation.

阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大规模HIV-1传播耐药性调查中多拉韦林耐药突变的流行情况。
背景:阿根廷报告了艾滋病毒/艾滋病(PLWHA)感染者中中度至高度的传播性耐药性,主要是对非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)的耐药性。Doravirine (DOR)具有独特的耐药特征,在最普遍的nnrti相关耐药病毒存在下仍保持有效的抗病毒活性。关于拉丁美洲DOR耐药相关突变(RAMs)频率的数据很少。在对传播性耐药(TDR)进行调查的背景下,我们描述了阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯成人PLWHA样本中DOR RAMs的流行情况。材料和方法:利用2017年至2021年在两个参考HIV诊所收集的样本进行横断面研究。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)突变表对样本进行RAMs分析。使用斯坦福大学和国家SIDA研究机构(ANRS)算法评估DOR突变。使用Stanford算法评估Rilpivirine (RPV) RAMs。使用斯坦福和ANRS标准的hiv - db程序评估对NNRTIs的易感性。结果:分析了1667例艾滋病感染者的样本:81.2%为男性,52.6%为男男性行为者。根据世卫组织清单,总体TDR为12.1% (n = 203)。nnrti的RAMs患病率为10.1%(170/1667),核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(nrti)的患病率为4%(67/1667),蛋白酶抑制剂(pi)的患病率为1.7%(30/1667)。最常见的NNRTI突变是K103N(5.6%)、G190A(0.89%)和K103S(0.77%)。结论:我们的研究表明,对第一代NNRTIs的耐药性持续存在中等至高水平。尽管如此,DOR的患病率很低。监测TDR对建议启动抗逆转录病毒治疗仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信