Hearing Aid Adoption Rates: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Influencing Factors of Prospective Hearing Aid Users.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Natalie Snyder, Anna Bixler, Karla Belcastro, Jacob B Hunter, Irina Linkov Middleton
{"title":"Hearing Aid Adoption Rates: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Influencing Factors of Prospective Hearing Aid Users.","authors":"Natalie Snyder, Anna Bixler, Karla Belcastro, Jacob B Hunter, Irina Linkov Middleton","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although approximately 80 percent of hearing loss cases are treatable with hearing aids (HAs), only one in four individuals who may benefit from them pursue them. Along with audiologists, physicians are integral parts of the hearing-health care team. Whether patients with hearing loss are more likely to pursue HA use based on the physician recommendation is unknown.<b>Purpose:</b> To investigate motivating factors and perceptions of prospective HA users, particularly the role of physician recommendations.<b>Research Design:</b> Patients 18 years and older who underwent an HA evaluation at our practice between January 2018 and December 2022 were identified. Patients were given a 17-question survey to assess their demographic characteristics and factors related to HA adoption via e-mail (<i>n</i> = 2,677) or as a physical copy (<i>n</i> = 487).<b>Study Sample:</b> Our sample (<i>n</i> = 321) included 182 female patients (57 percent) and 139 male patients (43 percent). Most patients identified as White/Caucasian (86 percent), followed by Black/African American (7 percent) and Hispanic/Latino (2 percent). Most patients were older adults (age 60 years and older), and 144 (45 percent) were older than 75 years.<b>Intervention:</b> We assessed the demographics and motivating factors related to HA adoption based on the results of the 17-question survey.<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, and multiple logistic regression. An <i>α</i> of 0.05 was set as the threshold of statistical significance.<b>Results:</b> Approximately 80 percent of participants adopted HAs after their evaluation. The most commonly selected factors that influenced their decision were cost, insurance coverage, and physician recommendation. Chi-square analyses were performed to compare these factors between patients who did and those who did not adopt HAs and yielded a significant difference (X² = 177.8; p < 0.0001). Patients' knowledge of multiple institutional locations that offer HAs (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.98; p = 0.045) and the office where they were evaluated (95 percent CI, 0.12-0.85; p = 0.019) were significant predictors of HA adoption.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings align with those of previous studies of motivating factors for HA adoption; however, with the addition of physician recommendation, our study showed higher HA adoption rates. These findings provide audiologists and physicians with insights regarding factors that impact HA adoption, which can help them develop a more individualized care plan during the initial evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although approximately 80 percent of hearing loss cases are treatable with hearing aids (HAs), only one in four individuals who may benefit from them pursue them. Along with audiologists, physicians are integral parts of the hearing-health care team. Whether patients with hearing loss are more likely to pursue HA use based on the physician recommendation is unknown.Purpose: To investigate motivating factors and perceptions of prospective HA users, particularly the role of physician recommendations.Research Design: Patients 18 years and older who underwent an HA evaluation at our practice between January 2018 and December 2022 were identified. Patients were given a 17-question survey to assess their demographic characteristics and factors related to HA adoption via e-mail (n = 2,677) or as a physical copy (n = 487).Study Sample: Our sample (n = 321) included 182 female patients (57 percent) and 139 male patients (43 percent). Most patients identified as White/Caucasian (86 percent), followed by Black/African American (7 percent) and Hispanic/Latino (2 percent). Most patients were older adults (age 60 years and older), and 144 (45 percent) were older than 75 years.Intervention: We assessed the demographics and motivating factors related to HA adoption based on the results of the 17-question survey.Data Collection and Analysis: Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, and multiple logistic regression. An α of 0.05 was set as the threshold of statistical significance.Results: Approximately 80 percent of participants adopted HAs after their evaluation. The most commonly selected factors that influenced their decision were cost, insurance coverage, and physician recommendation. Chi-square analyses were performed to compare these factors between patients who did and those who did not adopt HAs and yielded a significant difference (X² = 177.8; p < 0.0001). Patients' knowledge of multiple institutional locations that offer HAs (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.98; p = 0.045) and the office where they were evaluated (95 percent CI, 0.12-0.85; p = 0.019) were significant predictors of HA adoption.Conclusions: Our findings align with those of previous studies of motivating factors for HA adoption; however, with the addition of physician recommendation, our study showed higher HA adoption rates. These findings provide audiologists and physicians with insights regarding factors that impact HA adoption, which can help them develop a more individualized care plan during the initial evaluation.

助听器采用率:预期助听器使用者的认知、态度及影响因素。
背景:虽然大约80%的听力损失病例可以用助听器(HAs)治疗,但只有四分之一的人可能会从中受益。和听力学家一样,医生也是听力健康护理团队的组成部分。听力损失患者是否更有可能根据医生的建议使用HA尚不清楚。目的:调查激励因素和预期的医管局用户的看法,特别是医生推荐的作用。研究设计:确定2018年1月至2022年12月期间在我们诊所接受HA评估的18岁及以上患者。通过电子邮件(n = 2677)或实物副本(n = 487)对患者进行17个问题的调查,以评估他们的人口统计学特征和与采用HA相关的因素。研究样本:我们的样本(n = 321)包括182例女性(57%)和139例男性(43%)。大多数患者确定为白人/高加索人(86%),其次是黑人/非裔美国人(7%)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔(2%)。大多数患者是老年人(60岁及以上),144例(45%)年龄超过75岁。干预措施:根据17个问题的调查结果,我们评估了与采用医管局相关的人口统计数据和激励因素。数据收集与分析:采用描述性统计、卡方分析和多元逻辑回归对数据进行分析。以α 0.05为差异有统计学意义的阈值。结果:大约80%的参与者在评估后采用了HAs。影响他们决定的最常见因素是费用、保险范围和医生建议。采用卡方分析比较采用和未采用ha的患者的这些因素,结果显示差异有统计学意义(X²= 177.8;P < 0.0001)。患者对提供HAs的多个机构地点的了解(95%置信区间[CI], 0.23-0.98;p = 0.045)和评估他们的办公室(95% CI, 0.12-0.85;p = 0.019)是HA采用的显著预测因子。结论:我们的发现与之前关于HA采用的激励因素的研究一致;然而,加上医生推荐,我们的研究显示了更高的HA采用率。这些发现为听力学家和医生提供了有关影响HA采用的因素的见解,这可以帮助他们在初步评估期间制定更个性化的护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信