360-Degree Laser versus Localized Retinopexy in the Surgical Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment using Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jonas Stücheli, Christophe Valmaggia, Hendrik P N Scholl, Ivo Guber, Josef Guber
{"title":"360-Degree Laser versus Localized Retinopexy in the Surgical Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment using Pars Plana Vitrectomy.","authors":"Jonas Stücheli, Christophe Valmaggia, Hendrik P N Scholl, Ivo Guber, Josef Guber","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect of applying 360-degree laser (endolaser cerclage) versus local retinopexy on the re-detachment rate in patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-centre, cohort study was conducted. All patients who underwent PPV for RRD at a tertiary referral centre between December 2018 and January 2023 were included. The patients were allocated to subgroups based on their received treatment and the occurrence of re-detachment was assessed to determine the success of the procedure. Other risk factors evaluated included age, macula status, tamponade (gas, silicone oil) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 973 eyes were included, with endolaser cerclage being performed in 311 and localized retinopexy in 662 cases. With an overall re-detachment rate of 7.0%, the rate was significantly lower in the endolaser cerclage group (3.9% vs 8.5%, p = 0.009), even when controlling for confounding factors. Further subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of re-detachment in patients with a primary PVR (p = 0.011), macula-off situation (p = 0.006) and silicone oil tamponade (p = 0.008). Combined phacoemulsification did not increase the re-detachment rate but rather lowered it. Additionally, no difference was observed in the occurrence of secondary PVR re-detachment between the endolaser cerclage and localized retinopexy groups (p = 0.705).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data suggests that using 360-degree laser retinopexy during retinal detachment repair improves surgical outcomes and should be considered a preferred treatment option, especially in cases of severe retinal detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effect of applying 360-degree laser (endolaser cerclage) versus local retinopexy on the re-detachment rate in patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: A retrospective, single-centre, cohort study was conducted. All patients who underwent PPV for RRD at a tertiary referral centre between December 2018 and January 2023 were included. The patients were allocated to subgroups based on their received treatment and the occurrence of re-detachment was assessed to determine the success of the procedure. Other risk factors evaluated included age, macula status, tamponade (gas, silicone oil) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Results: A total of 973 eyes were included, with endolaser cerclage being performed in 311 and localized retinopexy in 662 cases. With an overall re-detachment rate of 7.0%, the rate was significantly lower in the endolaser cerclage group (3.9% vs 8.5%, p = 0.009), even when controlling for confounding factors. Further subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of re-detachment in patients with a primary PVR (p = 0.011), macula-off situation (p = 0.006) and silicone oil tamponade (p = 0.008). Combined phacoemulsification did not increase the re-detachment rate but rather lowered it. Additionally, no difference was observed in the occurrence of secondary PVR re-detachment between the endolaser cerclage and localized retinopexy groups (p = 0.705).

Conclusion: The data suggests that using 360-degree laser retinopexy during retinal detachment repair improves surgical outcomes and should be considered a preferred treatment option, especially in cases of severe retinal detachment.

360度激光与局部视网膜固定术治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的比较。
目的:比较360度激光环扎术与局部视网膜固定术对原发孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)行玻璃体切割(PPV)患者再脱离率的影响。方法:采用回顾性、单中心、队列研究。所有在2018年12月至2023年1月期间在三级转诊中心因RRD接受PPV治疗的患者均被纳入研究。根据患者接受的治疗情况将其分配到亚组,并评估再脱离的发生情况以确定手术的成功。评估的其他危险因素包括年龄、黄斑状态、填塞(气体、硅油)和增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)。结果:共纳入973只眼,其中激光环扎术311例,局部视网膜固定术662例。即使在控制混杂因素的情况下,激光环扎组的总体再脱离率为7.0%,明显低于激光环扎组(3.9% vs 8.5%, p = 0.009)。进一步的亚组分析显示,原发性PVR (p = 0.011)、黄斑脱落(p = 0.006)和硅油填塞(p = 0.008)的患者再脱离的风险更高。联合超声乳化术并没有提高再脱离率,反而降低了再脱离率。此外,激光环扎术组和局部视网膜固定术组继发性PVR再脱离的发生率无差异(p = 0.705)。结论:数据提示,在视网膜脱离修复过程中使用360度激光视网膜固定术可改善手术效果,应被视为首选治疗方案,特别是在严重视网膜脱离的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信