Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Lead to Gastrointestinal Benefits in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Jung-Hui Hsu, Hsueh-Fen Bai, Mon-Ting Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Jing-Tong Wang, Chieh-Yu Liu, Ming-Hsein Tsai
{"title":"Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Lead to Gastrointestinal Benefits in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Jung-Hui Hsu, Hsueh-Fen Bai, Mon-Ting Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Jing-Tong Wang, Chieh-Yu Liu, Ming-Hsein Tsai","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) is a promising therapy for heart and kidney health in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, information on its GI benefits is limited. This study aimed to investigate the gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes of GLP1-RA use in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Dataset with a new-user and active-comparator design. The study included 2 304 761 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² from January 2019 to December 2022. To establish cohorts, we designated users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) as the control group. Two cohorts were formed for analysis after propensity score matching by baseline characteristics, each comprising 127 216 patients - one using GLP1-RA and the other DPP4i. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate GI outcomes over 4 years between groups. RESULTS After matching, the average age of the population was about 60 years, with approximately 55% male and 63% identifying as White people. GLP1-RA users demonstrated a lower risk of acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97), liver failure (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88), peritonitis (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94), peptic ulcer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), and GI bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) compared to DPP4i users, indicating significant GI-protective effects. Furthermore, the GI advantages of GLP14A over DPP4i were consistently observed across various propensity score matching models. CONCLUSIONS GLP1-RA treatment in T2DM has some GI advantages compared to DPP4, which should be considered when personalizing T2DM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) is a promising therapy for heart and kidney health in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, information on its GI benefits is limited. This study aimed to investigate the gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes of GLP1-RA use in patients with T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Dataset with a new-user and active-comparator design. The study included 2 304 761 adult patients diagnosed with T2DM and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² from January 2019 to December 2022. To establish cohorts, we designated users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) as the control group. Two cohorts were formed for analysis after propensity score matching by baseline characteristics, each comprising 127 216 patients - one using GLP1-RA and the other DPP4i. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate GI outcomes over 4 years between groups. RESULTS After matching, the average age of the population was about 60 years, with approximately 55% male and 63% identifying as White people. GLP1-RA users demonstrated a lower risk of acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97), liver failure (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88), peritonitis (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94), peptic ulcer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), and GI bleeding (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) compared to DPP4i users, indicating significant GI-protective effects. Furthermore, the GI advantages of GLP14A over DPP4i were consistently observed across various propensity score matching models. CONCLUSIONS GLP1-RA treatment in T2DM has some GI advantages compared to DPP4, which should be considered when personalizing T2DM treatment.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者胃肠道的益处:一项真实世界的研究
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)是一种很有前景的治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)心脏和肾脏健康的药物。然而,关于其GI益处的信息是有限的。本研究旨在探讨GLP1-RA在T2DM患者中的胃肠道(GI)结局。材料和方法本回顾性队列研究利用TriNetX数据集,采用新用户和主动比较器设计。该研究纳入了2019年1月至2022年12月诊断为T2DM的2 304 761名成年患者,估计肾小球滤过率≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²。为了建立队列,我们指定二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)使用者作为对照组。在倾向评分与基线特征匹配后,形成两个队列进行分析,每个队列包括127 216例患者-一组使用GLP1-RA,另一组使用DPP4i。Cox比例风险回归模型用于评估组间4年的GI结局。结果匹配后,人口的平均年龄约为60岁,男性约占55%,白人约占63%。与DPP4i使用者相比,GLP1-RA使用者表现出较低的急性胰腺炎(风险比[HR]: 0.90, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.83-0.97)、肝功能衰竭(HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88)、腹膜炎(HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94)、消化性溃疡(HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94)和胃肠道出血(HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98)的风险,表明显著的GI保护作用。此外,在各种倾向评分匹配模型中,GLP14A优于DPP4i的GI优势一致地被观察到。结论:与DPP4相比,GLP1-RA治疗T2DM具有一定的GI优势,在个性化T2DM治疗时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信