Understanding diuretic nonadherence among patients with heart failure: A mixed-methods study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rebecca Meraz, Kathryn Osteen, Jocelyn Mcgee, Paul Noblitt, Henry Viejo
{"title":"Understanding diuretic nonadherence among patients with heart failure: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Rebecca Meraz, Kathryn Osteen, Jocelyn Mcgee, Paul Noblitt, Henry Viejo","doi":"10.1177/17423953251338585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the extent of diuretic nonadherence and to understand the reasons for diuretic nonadherence among patients with a 90-day heart failure hospital readmission.MethodsThis study utilized a convergent parallel mixed-method design. The extent and reasons for medication nonadherence were measured using the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence scale. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand patients' reasons for nonadherence. Descriptive and regression tests were used to analyze quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. Meta-inferences were developed from merged data.ResultsEighty-two adults participated in the study. The merged data indicated that 61% of participants were diuretic nonadherent. The analysis of merged data revealed 3 meta-inferences: (1) Diuretic nonadherence may not be entirely unintentional or intentional; (2) Fearing a loss of dignity contributes to diuretic nonadherence; and (3) Diuretic nonadherence is an act of self-determination.DiscussionIn this study, diuretic nonadherence was a complex mix of unintentional and intentional reasons, a strategy to protect against dignity loss, and an effort to gain control over diuretic effects. A need for dignity and self-determination may be important drivers of nonadherence and should be considered by clinicians and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48530,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Illness","volume":" ","pages":"17423953251338585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953251338585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the extent of diuretic nonadherence and to understand the reasons for diuretic nonadherence among patients with a 90-day heart failure hospital readmission.MethodsThis study utilized a convergent parallel mixed-method design. The extent and reasons for medication nonadherence were measured using the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence scale. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand patients' reasons for nonadherence. Descriptive and regression tests were used to analyze quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. Meta-inferences were developed from merged data.ResultsEighty-two adults participated in the study. The merged data indicated that 61% of participants were diuretic nonadherent. The analysis of merged data revealed 3 meta-inferences: (1) Diuretic nonadherence may not be entirely unintentional or intentional; (2) Fearing a loss of dignity contributes to diuretic nonadherence; and (3) Diuretic nonadherence is an act of self-determination.DiscussionIn this study, diuretic nonadherence was a complex mix of unintentional and intentional reasons, a strategy to protect against dignity loss, and an effort to gain control over diuretic effects. A need for dignity and self-determination may be important drivers of nonadherence and should be considered by clinicians and researchers.

了解心力衰竭患者的利尿剂不依从:一项混合方法研究。
目的本研究的目的是评估利尿剂不依从性的程度,并了解90天心力衰竭再入院患者利尿剂不依从性的原因。方法采用收敛并行混合法设计。用药不依从程度及原因采用主观不依从程度量表进行测量。采用半结构化访谈来了解患者不遵医嘱的原因。采用描述性和回归检验对定量数据进行分析。定性数据分析采用专题分析。元推论是从合并的数据中发展出来的。结果共有82名成年人参与研究。合并数据显示,61%的参与者为利尿剂不粘连。合并数据的分析揭示了3个元推断:(1)利尿剂不依从可能不是完全无意或有意的;(2)害怕失去尊严导致利尿剂不依从性;(3)利尿剂不依从是一种自我决定的行为。在本研究中,利尿剂的不依从性是一个复杂的混合,包括无意和有意的原因,一种防止尊严丧失的策略,以及一种控制利尿剂作用的努力。对尊严和自决的需要可能是不遵守的重要驱动因素,临床医生和研究人员应该考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Illness
Chronic Illness Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Chronic illnesses are prolonged, do not resolve spontaneously, and are rarely completely cured. The most common are cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke and heart failure), the arthritides, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and epilepsy. There is increasing evidence that mental illnesses such as depression are best understood as chronic health problems. HIV/AIDS has become a chronic condition in those countries where effective medication is available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信