Emancipatory Learning of a Hermeneutic Phenomenology Methodology Course.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Susan Crowther, Gill Thomson
{"title":"Emancipatory Learning of a Hermeneutic Phenomenology Methodology Course.","authors":"Susan Crowther, Gill Thomson","doi":"10.1177/10497323251342442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While various pedagogical approaches have been developed, there is little understanding of which are best for postgraduate research studies. This is particularly salient for a complex and evolving methodology such as hermeneutic phenomenology. We undertook a hermeneutic phenomenology study to capture participants' lived experiences and meanings of attending a hermeneutic phenomenology methodology course (in person and/or online). An open invitation was issued to participants who had previously attended a hermeneutic phenomenology methodology course. Participants were invited to provide a crafted narrative (using text, poems, artwork, and/or photos) and to indicate whether they would be willing to take part in a follow-up interview. Data analysis was undertaken collaboratively, and philosophical notions and wider theories were used to illuminate meanings. Thirteen participants provided data using text, poems, or photographs. Data analysis revealed four experiential qualities: \"Attuning to a learning space\" that describes the facilitators' comportment and attunement; \"Learning-with-others\" highlights the value of being-with other learners; \"Revealing new ways of knowing\" surfaced through the notions of quickening and hearkening; and finally, \"Transformation in thinking\" describes how attending the course had changed how participants perceive themselves and others as new understandings brought them to the edge of their knowing to glimpse new horizons. These four qualities coalesced into the phenomenon \"emancipatory learning.\" The study foregrounds the significance of a reflexive and immersive pedagogy that emphasizes how dialogue, participation, reflexivity, and collaboration can enable participants to attune to learning \"how to learn\" hermeneutic phenomenological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251342442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251342442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While various pedagogical approaches have been developed, there is little understanding of which are best for postgraduate research studies. This is particularly salient for a complex and evolving methodology such as hermeneutic phenomenology. We undertook a hermeneutic phenomenology study to capture participants' lived experiences and meanings of attending a hermeneutic phenomenology methodology course (in person and/or online). An open invitation was issued to participants who had previously attended a hermeneutic phenomenology methodology course. Participants were invited to provide a crafted narrative (using text, poems, artwork, and/or photos) and to indicate whether they would be willing to take part in a follow-up interview. Data analysis was undertaken collaboratively, and philosophical notions and wider theories were used to illuminate meanings. Thirteen participants provided data using text, poems, or photographs. Data analysis revealed four experiential qualities: "Attuning to a learning space" that describes the facilitators' comportment and attunement; "Learning-with-others" highlights the value of being-with other learners; "Revealing new ways of knowing" surfaced through the notions of quickening and hearkening; and finally, "Transformation in thinking" describes how attending the course had changed how participants perceive themselves and others as new understandings brought them to the edge of their knowing to glimpse new horizons. These four qualities coalesced into the phenomenon "emancipatory learning." The study foregrounds the significance of a reflexive and immersive pedagogy that emphasizes how dialogue, participation, reflexivity, and collaboration can enable participants to attune to learning "how to learn" hermeneutic phenomenological research.

解释学现象学方法论课程的解放学习。
虽然已经开发了各种各样的教学方法,但对于哪种方法最适合研究生研究学习,人们知之甚少。对于像解释学现象学这样复杂而不断发展的方法论来说,这一点尤为突出。我们进行了一项解释学现象学研究,以捕捉参与者的生活经验和参加解释学现象学方法论课程的意义(亲自和/或在线)。公开邀请之前参加过解释学现象学方法论课程的参与者。参与者被邀请提供精心制作的叙述(使用文字、诗歌、艺术品和/或照片),并表明他们是否愿意参加后续采访。数据分析是协同进行的,并使用哲学概念和更广泛的理论来阐明含义。13名参与者通过文字、诗歌或照片提供数据。数据分析揭示了四个体验品质:“适应学习空间”,描述了引导者的举止和适应;“与他人一起学习”强调与其他学习者在一起的价值;“揭示认识的新方法”通过加速和倾听的概念浮出水面;最后,“思维的转变”描述了参加课程如何改变了参与者对自己和他人的看法,因为新的理解将他们带到了知识的边缘,从而瞥见了新的视野。这四种特质结合在一起形成了“解放式学习”的现象。该研究强调了反思性和沉浸式教学法的重要性,强调对话、参与、反思性和协作如何使参与者适应学习“如何学习”解释学现象学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信