Sleep quality after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of robotic-assisted and conventional techniques.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
A B Suhas Masilamani, Tarun Jayakumar, Praharsha Mulpur, Rajeev Reddy Kikkuri, Shravya Vaddiparthi, A V Gurava Reddy
{"title":"Sleep quality after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of robotic-assisted and conventional techniques.","authors":"A B Suhas Masilamani, Tarun Jayakumar, Praharsha Mulpur, Rajeev Reddy Kikkuri, Shravya Vaddiparthi, A V Gurava Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02405-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly alleviates pain and improves functionality in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, postoperative sleep disturbances remain a common issue affecting quality of life (QOL) and rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare postoperative sleep quality between robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) and conventional TKA (CTKA). This observational study enrolled 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA, divided equally into RATKA and CTKA cohorts. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using cemented TKA, either conventionally or with the MAKO® robotic system. Standardized pain management and rehabilitation protocols were followed in both cohorts. Preoperative and postoperative sleep quality were evaluated weekly for the first month and subsequently at 3 and 6 months post-operatively, utilizing the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Preoperative PSQI scores showed no significant differences between the RATKA (5.55 ± 2.05) and conventional TKA (5.70 ± 2.26) groups. Postoperative sleep disturbances peaked at 1 week post-surgery in both cohorts (RATKA: 12.42 ± 1.75, TKA: 12.59 ± 2.42), with gradual improvement observed over 6 months, although baseline sleep quality was not fully restored. Pain scores (VAS) were significantly lower in the RATKA cohort at all postoperative intervals (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between sleep quality and age, BMI, gender, or surgical approach. Both RATKA and conventional TKA resulted in similar patterns of postoperative sleep disturbances, peaking shortly after surgery and progressively improving over 6 months without fully returning to pre-operative levels. Despite significantly better pain control in the RATKA cohort, postoperative sleep quality did not differ significantly between the two surgical techniques. Future research should explore comprehensive perioperative management strategies to address the multifactorial nature of sleep disturbances post-TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02405-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly alleviates pain and improves functionality in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, postoperative sleep disturbances remain a common issue affecting quality of life (QOL) and rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare postoperative sleep quality between robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) and conventional TKA (CTKA). This observational study enrolled 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA, divided equally into RATKA and CTKA cohorts. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using cemented TKA, either conventionally or with the MAKO® robotic system. Standardized pain management and rehabilitation protocols were followed in both cohorts. Preoperative and postoperative sleep quality were evaluated weekly for the first month and subsequently at 3 and 6 months post-operatively, utilizing the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Preoperative PSQI scores showed no significant differences between the RATKA (5.55 ± 2.05) and conventional TKA (5.70 ± 2.26) groups. Postoperative sleep disturbances peaked at 1 week post-surgery in both cohorts (RATKA: 12.42 ± 1.75, TKA: 12.59 ± 2.42), with gradual improvement observed over 6 months, although baseline sleep quality was not fully restored. Pain scores (VAS) were significantly lower in the RATKA cohort at all postoperative intervals (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between sleep quality and age, BMI, gender, or surgical approach. Both RATKA and conventional TKA resulted in similar patterns of postoperative sleep disturbances, peaking shortly after surgery and progressively improving over 6 months without fully returning to pre-operative levels. Despite significantly better pain control in the RATKA cohort, postoperative sleep quality did not differ significantly between the two surgical techniques. Future research should explore comprehensive perioperative management strategies to address the multifactorial nature of sleep disturbances post-TKA.

全膝关节置换术后的睡眠质量:机器人辅助和传统技术的比较分析。
全膝关节置换术(TKA)可显著减轻终末期膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛和改善功能。然而,术后睡眠障碍仍然是影响生活质量(QOL)和康复的常见问题。本研究旨在比较机器人辅助TKA (RATKA)和传统TKA (CTKA)的术后睡眠质量。这项观察性研究招募了200名连续接受原发性单侧TKA的患者,平均分为RATKA和CTKA队列。所有手术均由一名外科医生使用骨水泥TKA完成,无论是常规手术还是MAKO®机器人系统。两组患者均遵循标准化的疼痛管理和康复方案。术前和术后第一个月每周评估一次睡眠质量,随后在术后3个月和6个月使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录疼痛评分。术前PSQI评分RATKA组(5.55±2.05)与常规TKA组(5.70±2.26)比较差异无统计学意义。两组患者术后睡眠障碍均在术后1周达到高峰(RATKA: 12.42±1.75,TKA: 12.59±2.42),6个月后逐渐改善,但基线睡眠质量未完全恢复。RATKA组的疼痛评分(VAS)在所有术后间隔均显著降低(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信