Hearing the Voice of the Patient in Value-Based Care Initiatives: Lessons from International Experiences.

Q4 Medicine
Richard L Gundling
{"title":"Hearing the Voice of the Patient in Value-Based Care Initiatives: Lessons from International Experiences.","authors":"Richard L Gundling","doi":"10.1097/HAP.0000000000000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health outcomes that matter most to patients-those that affect their quality of life-are considered an integral yet underutilized element of value-based care and payment. These metrics, which are captured by reports that come directly from patients without clinician intervention, are known as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Public and private payers in the US are increasingly calling for the use of PRO measures (PROMs), which will require hospitals, health systems, and physician practices to invest in developing new organizational capabilities. The first steps in adopting PROMs are determining what to measure and choosing the right instruments. Beyond that, common challenges of PROMs implementation-such as engaging patients and clinicians, mitigating barriers to data collection and analysis, and identifying and following best practices-transcend geographic boundaries. This article shares lessons learned about overcoming these challenges from hospitals that have implemented PROMs in clinical care in the Netherlands and Sweden, which are among the countries that have a long history with PROMs. Selected resources for healthcare organizations beginning their PROMs journey are also included in the article, which is intended as a brief introduction to the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":39916,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Health Services Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Health Services Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HAP.0000000000000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health outcomes that matter most to patients-those that affect their quality of life-are considered an integral yet underutilized element of value-based care and payment. These metrics, which are captured by reports that come directly from patients without clinician intervention, are known as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Public and private payers in the US are increasingly calling for the use of PRO measures (PROMs), which will require hospitals, health systems, and physician practices to invest in developing new organizational capabilities. The first steps in adopting PROMs are determining what to measure and choosing the right instruments. Beyond that, common challenges of PROMs implementation-such as engaging patients and clinicians, mitigating barriers to data collection and analysis, and identifying and following best practices-transcend geographic boundaries. This article shares lessons learned about overcoming these challenges from hospitals that have implemented PROMs in clinical care in the Netherlands and Sweden, which are among the countries that have a long history with PROMs. Selected resources for healthcare organizations beginning their PROMs journey are also included in the article, which is intended as a brief introduction to the topic.

在基于价值的护理倡议中倾听病人的声音:来自国际经验的教训。
对病人来说最重要的健康结果——那些影响他们生活质量的结果——被认为是基于价值的护理和支付中不可或缺但未得到充分利用的因素。这些指标是在没有临床医生干预的情况下直接从患者那里获得的,被称为患者报告的结果(PROs)。美国的公共和私人支付者越来越多地要求使用PRO措施(PROMs),这将要求医院、卫生系统和医生实践投资于开发新的组织能力。采用prom的第一步是确定要测量什么和选择正确的仪器。除此之外,PROMs实施的常见挑战——例如吸引患者和临床医生,减轻数据收集和分析的障碍,以及确定和遵循最佳实践——超越了地理界限。本文分享了荷兰和瑞典在临床护理中实施prom的医院克服这些挑战的经验教训,这两个国家都有很长的prom历史。本文还包括为开始其prom之旅的医疗保健组织选择的资源,这是对该主题的简要介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers of Health Services Management
Frontiers of Health Services Management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Disaster preparedness. The future of health professions. Workforce shortages. Alternative medicine. You want to understand the latest trends, but you don"t always have time for books. Magazines don"t give you quite enough information. Keeping up doesn"t have to be difficult. Frontiers can bring you up to speed quickly. Frontiers" unique "bookazine" format gives you the deep understanding gained from books but in a shorter format, like a magazine. Each issue focuses on one healthcare management topic, providing you with the knowledge you need to understand and react to evolving trends. Frontiers is written by experts on the topic and includes commentary from the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信