A 61-Year-Old Man with Perforation of the Left Ventricle and Pericardium 3 Days After Insertion of a Cardiac Pacemaker Lead.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shanqing Bao, Ke Yang, Yuanhong Li, Tenglong Wang, Chengxin Zhang
{"title":"A 61-Year-Old Man with Perforation of the Left Ventricle and Pericardium 3 Days After Insertion of a Cardiac Pacemaker Lead.","authors":"Shanqing Bao, Ke Yang, Yuanhong Li, Tenglong Wang, Chengxin Zhang","doi":"10.12659/AJCR.947341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The use of implantable cardiac devices, including permanent pacemakers, has become routine, and reported complications are rare. However, in some cases, a cardiac pacemaker lead can perforate the ventricular or atrial wall. However, patients can present with nonspecific and heterogeneous clinical manifestations, leading to potential delays in diagnosis. We present a case of a 61-year-old man with perforation of the left ventricle and pericardium diagnosed 3 days after the insertion of a cardiac pacemaker lead. CASE REPORT A 61-year-old man with symptomatic second-degree type II sinoatrial block underwent uneventful dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation. On the evening of the third day following the pacemaker implantation procedure, the patient presented with persistent chest pain and was admitted to the hospital. Emergency chest computed tomography demonstrated that the right ventricular pacemaker lead had penetrated the left ventricle and pericardium. The patient underwent surgery on the fourth day of admission, and the pacing lead was secured to the left ventricular myocardium via a small incision in the left intercostal space. The surgical procedure was completed successfully, and the patient was discharged on the third postoperative day, without any complications. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac perforation due to the lead is a rare but potentially fatal complication of pacemaker implantation. We present a patient who presented with a left ventricular and pericardium perforation 3 days after pacemaker implantation. This clinical case underscores the necessity for screening for perforation in patients treated with cardiac implantable electronic devices prior to discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":39064,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Case Reports","volume":"26 ","pages":"e947341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.947341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The use of implantable cardiac devices, including permanent pacemakers, has become routine, and reported complications are rare. However, in some cases, a cardiac pacemaker lead can perforate the ventricular or atrial wall. However, patients can present with nonspecific and heterogeneous clinical manifestations, leading to potential delays in diagnosis. We present a case of a 61-year-old man with perforation of the left ventricle and pericardium diagnosed 3 days after the insertion of a cardiac pacemaker lead. CASE REPORT A 61-year-old man with symptomatic second-degree type II sinoatrial block underwent uneventful dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation. On the evening of the third day following the pacemaker implantation procedure, the patient presented with persistent chest pain and was admitted to the hospital. Emergency chest computed tomography demonstrated that the right ventricular pacemaker lead had penetrated the left ventricle and pericardium. The patient underwent surgery on the fourth day of admission, and the pacing lead was secured to the left ventricular myocardium via a small incision in the left intercostal space. The surgical procedure was completed successfully, and the patient was discharged on the third postoperative day, without any complications. CONCLUSIONS Cardiac perforation due to the lead is a rare but potentially fatal complication of pacemaker implantation. We present a patient who presented with a left ventricular and pericardium perforation 3 days after pacemaker implantation. This clinical case underscores the necessity for screening for perforation in patients treated with cardiac implantable electronic devices prior to discharge.

1例61岁男性左心室和心包膜穿孔,植入心脏起搏器导联3天后。
植入式心脏装置的使用,包括永久性起搏器,已经成为常规,报道的并发症是罕见的。然而,在某些情况下,心脏起搏器导联可能穿孔心室壁或心房壁。然而,患者可能呈现非特异性和异质性的临床表现,导致潜在的诊断延误。我们提出了一个61岁的男子穿孔左心室和心包膜诊断3天后插入心脏起搏器铅。病例报告一名有症状的二度II型窦房传导阻滞的61岁男性接受了平稳的双腔永久性起搏器植入。在心脏起搏器植入手术后的第三天晚上,患者出现持续的胸痛并住进了医院。急诊胸部计算机断层扫描显示右心室起搏器导联已穿透左心室和心包膜。患者入院第4天行手术,起搏导联通过左肋间隙小切口固定于左心室心肌。手术顺利完成,患者于术后第三天出院,无任何并发症。结论:起搏器植入引起的心脏穿孔是一种罕见但可能致命的并发症。我们提出了一个病人谁提出了左心室和心包穿孔后3天起搏器植入。这个临床病例强调了在使用心脏植入式电子设备治疗的患者出院前筛查穿孔的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Case Reports
American Journal of Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
599
期刊介绍: American Journal of Case Reports is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes single and series case reports in all medical fields. American Journal of Case Reports is issued on a continuous basis as a primary electronic journal. Print copies of a single article or a set of articles can be ordered on demand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信