'Future Docs for Abortion Access': lessons learnt from 1 year of medical student advocacy in the USA.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Catherine R Stratis, Sarah M McNeilly, Carly C Tymm, Alexis L Zachem, Daniel D Baboolal, Adam R Jacobs
{"title":"'Future Docs for Abortion Access': lessons learnt from 1 year of medical student advocacy in the USA.","authors":"Catherine R Stratis, Sarah M McNeilly, Carly C Tymm, Alexis L Zachem, Daniel D Baboolal, Adam R Jacobs","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-013041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abortion's place in US medical education has long been tenuous. Most medical students have historically lacked adequate abortion instruction, which stands to worsen following the <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health</i> decision. Trainee-led advocacy through organisations like Medical Students for Choice (MSFC) has enhanced this instruction nationally and globally. While MSFC offers robust resources to supplement institutional curricula, ample opportunities for student advocates to design interventions meeting the unique needs of their local communities exist. Immediately post-Dobbs, all New York City (NYC)-area MSFC chapters formed a novel advocacy coalition, MSFC NYC, to address the evolving reproductive health education and access needs within NYC and across the USA. Our coalition established three key priorities: (1) Enhance and standardise abortion education for all NYC medical students, (2) Strengthen abortion's legal protections in New York (NY) State and (3) Support patients in abortion-restricted states. In turn, our first year prioritised three key initiatives: (1) Authoring and distributing the <i>'Accessing Abortion in NYC'</i> peer educational resource guide, (2) Supporting a grass-roots political campaign to expand abortion training and access in NY and (3) Launching the now-annual <i>'Future Docs for Abortion Access'</i> fundraiser. Our multi-institutional coalition united medical students and physician mentors with community-based reproductive health organisations, aligning our advocacy work with our local communities' needs while creating an enduring advocacy presence within our city and state. By replicating this coalition-building model, fellow trainees can not only expand abortion access and education in different geographies, but further student-led efforts to promote various social justice causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":"51 2","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abortion's place in US medical education has long been tenuous. Most medical students have historically lacked adequate abortion instruction, which stands to worsen following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision. Trainee-led advocacy through organisations like Medical Students for Choice (MSFC) has enhanced this instruction nationally and globally. While MSFC offers robust resources to supplement institutional curricula, ample opportunities for student advocates to design interventions meeting the unique needs of their local communities exist. Immediately post-Dobbs, all New York City (NYC)-area MSFC chapters formed a novel advocacy coalition, MSFC NYC, to address the evolving reproductive health education and access needs within NYC and across the USA. Our coalition established three key priorities: (1) Enhance and standardise abortion education for all NYC medical students, (2) Strengthen abortion's legal protections in New York (NY) State and (3) Support patients in abortion-restricted states. In turn, our first year prioritised three key initiatives: (1) Authoring and distributing the 'Accessing Abortion in NYC' peer educational resource guide, (2) Supporting a grass-roots political campaign to expand abortion training and access in NY and (3) Launching the now-annual 'Future Docs for Abortion Access' fundraiser. Our multi-institutional coalition united medical students and physician mentors with community-based reproductive health organisations, aligning our advocacy work with our local communities' needs while creating an enduring advocacy presence within our city and state. By replicating this coalition-building model, fellow trainees can not only expand abortion access and education in different geographies, but further student-led efforts to promote various social justice causes.

“未来的堕胎医生”:从美国医学院学生倡导1年的经验教训。
长期以来,堕胎在美国医学教育中的地位一直很薄弱。大多数医科学生历来缺乏适当的堕胎指导,在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康案判决后,这种情况将进一步恶化。通过医学学生选择组织(MSFC)等由实习生领导的宣传活动,在全国和全球范围内加强了这方面的指导。虽然MSFC提供了丰富的资源来补充机构课程,但学生倡导者有充足的机会来设计满足当地社区独特需求的干预措施。多布斯会议结束后不久,MSFC在纽约地区的所有分会成立了一个新的倡导联盟——MSFC NYC,以解决纽约市和美国各地不断发展的生殖健康教育和获取需求。我们的联盟确定了三个关键优先事项:(1)加强纽约市所有医科学生的堕胎教育并使其标准化;(2)加强纽约州对堕胎的法律保护;(3)支持限制堕胎州的患者。反过来,我们的第一年优先考虑了三个关键举措:(1)编写和分发“在纽约获得堕胎”的同伴教育资源指南,(2)支持基层政治运动,以扩大纽约的堕胎培训和获取途径,(3)发起现在每年一次的“未来医生堕胎获取”筹款活动。我们的多机构联盟将医学生和医生导师与社区生殖健康组织联合起来,使我们的宣传工作与当地社区的需求保持一致,同时在我们的城市和州内建立持久的宣传存在。通过复制这种建立联盟的模式,学员们不仅可以在不同地区扩大堕胎服务和教育,还可以进一步推动学生主导的各种社会正义事业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信