{"title":"Separation of sperm based on rheotaxis mechanism using a microfluidic device.","authors":"Hossein Torkashvand, Shamim Pilehvari, Ronak Shabani, Rana Mehdizade, Leila Torkashvand, Mahdi Moghimi, Roya Derakhshan, Mehdi Mehdizadeh","doi":"10.5653/cerm.2024.07304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the application of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), selection of the optimal sperm presents a challenge. This study introduces an innovative microfluidic device that utilizes rheotaxis to efficiently sort sperm, offering superior selection of high-quality sperm compared to conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 30 normal samples from couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles at the Infertility Center of Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan, Iran. Each sample was divided into three groups: the initial sample, representing the control group; direct swim-up sperm selection; and sperm selection using rheotaxis. A syringe pump connected to the microfluidic device generated optimal flow conditions. Spermatozoa were evaluated regarding concentration, motility, morphology, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance and the Student t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concentration (7.46±2.84 million cells/mL vs. 56.67±18.27 million cells/mL, p<0.0001) and DFI (2.93±2.70 vs. 21.13±5.27, p<0.0001) were significantly lower in the sperm selected using the rheotaxis microfluidic device than in the control sperm. Progressive motility (98.10%±2.41% vs. 44.13%±7.06%, p<0.0001), normal morphology (8.36%±1.47% vs. 5.20%±1.15%, p<0.0001), and MMP (99.63%±0.71% vs. 81.13%±9.19%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher with the device than in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a rheotaxis-based microfluidic device appeared effective in selecting high-quality sperm, demonstrating improvements in motility, morphology, and MMP and a reduction in DFI. This advancement has the potential to improve the outcomes of ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":46409,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine-CERM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2024.07304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: In the application of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), selection of the optimal sperm presents a challenge. This study introduces an innovative microfluidic device that utilizes rheotaxis to efficiently sort sperm, offering superior selection of high-quality sperm compared to conventional methods.
Methods: We analyzed 30 normal samples from couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles at the Infertility Center of Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan, Iran. Each sample was divided into three groups: the initial sample, representing the control group; direct swim-up sperm selection; and sperm selection using rheotaxis. A syringe pump connected to the microfluidic device generated optimal flow conditions. Spermatozoa were evaluated regarding concentration, motility, morphology, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance and the Student t-test.
Results: The concentration (7.46±2.84 million cells/mL vs. 56.67±18.27 million cells/mL, p<0.0001) and DFI (2.93±2.70 vs. 21.13±5.27, p<0.0001) were significantly lower in the sperm selected using the rheotaxis microfluidic device than in the control sperm. Progressive motility (98.10%±2.41% vs. 44.13%±7.06%, p<0.0001), normal morphology (8.36%±1.47% vs. 5.20%±1.15%, p<0.0001), and MMP (99.63%±0.71% vs. 81.13%±9.19%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher with the device than in the control group.
Conclusion: The use of a rheotaxis-based microfluidic device appeared effective in selecting high-quality sperm, demonstrating improvements in motility, morphology, and MMP and a reduction in DFI. This advancement has the potential to improve the outcomes of ART.
目的:在辅助生殖技术的应用中,最佳精子的选择是一个挑战。本研究介绍了一种创新的微流体装置,该装置利用流变性来有效地分选精子,与传统方法相比,提供了更好的高质量精子选择。方法:我们分析了伊朗哈马丹Fatemieh医院不育中心接受卵胞浆内单精子注射周期的夫妇的30例正常样本。每个样本分为三组:初始样本,代表对照组;直接游动精子选择;和精子选择使用流变性。连接到微流体装置的注射泵产生最佳流动条件。评估精子的浓度、活力、形态、线粒体膜电位(MMP)和精子DNA碎片指数(DFI)。采用单向方差分析和学生t检验确定统计显著性。结果:(746±284万个细胞/mL vs. 56.67±1827万个细胞/mL)结论:使用基于流变的微流控装置可以有效地选择高质量精子,表现出运动、形态和MMP的改善以及DFI的降低。这一进展有可能改善抗逆转录病毒治疗的结果。