The Technical Quality of Preclinical Tooth Preparation by Undergraduate Dental Students.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S522300
Sami A Almohefer, Rana K Alkattan, Ghadah D Aldakhayel, Fatimah F Alolaiqi, Lamia H Alharbi, Ahmed A Madfa
{"title":"The Technical Quality of Preclinical Tooth Preparation by Undergraduate Dental Students.","authors":"Sami A Almohefer, Rana K Alkattan, Ghadah D Aldakhayel, Fatimah F Alolaiqi, Lamia H Alharbi, Ahmed A Madfa","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S522300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth preparation is a fundamental technical skill in dentistry, demanding accuracy, careful attention to detail, and a comprehensive knowledge of dental anatomy. Pre-clinical training allows dental students to cultivate and enhance these abilities prior to conducting procedures on real patients. This research seeks to assess the quality of tooth preparation carried out by dental students in their pre-clinical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 221 artificial typodont teeth were used for simulated tooth preparations for a full contour ceramic crown by fourth-year pre-clinical dental students in a simulated dental environment (n=111 males and 110 females). Jaw models were mounted on phantom heads during the tooth preparation procedure. The tooth preparations were evaluated using standardized criteria, including 1.5-2 mm lingual, facial, axial and occlusal reductions, 6-10 degrees of axial wall taper, marginal integrity and surface smoothness. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results as either acceptable or unacceptable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the students showed unacceptable occlusal reduction (89.6%). For axial reduction, the majority of students showed unacceptable results, recorded in 99.5% and 98.6% on the mesial and distal sides, respectively. Unacceptable facial and lingual reductions were noted in 93.7% and 77.4%, respectively. The taper angle on the mesial and distal sides was acceptable in 53.8% and 57.5%, respectively. About 56.6% of the dental students demonstrated acceptable marginal placement during preparation. Moreover, satisfactory finishing and rounded angles of the preparation were done by 68.3% and 58.4% of the students, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed that most students achieved unsatisfactory results. This study underscores the importance of continuous assessment and tailored teaching strategies to enhance the quality of tooth preparation during pre-clinical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"903-915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S522300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tooth preparation is a fundamental technical skill in dentistry, demanding accuracy, careful attention to detail, and a comprehensive knowledge of dental anatomy. Pre-clinical training allows dental students to cultivate and enhance these abilities prior to conducting procedures on real patients. This research seeks to assess the quality of tooth preparation carried out by dental students in their pre-clinical training.

Methods: A total of 221 artificial typodont teeth were used for simulated tooth preparations for a full contour ceramic crown by fourth-year pre-clinical dental students in a simulated dental environment (n=111 males and 110 females). Jaw models were mounted on phantom heads during the tooth preparation procedure. The tooth preparations were evaluated using standardized criteria, including 1.5-2 mm lingual, facial, axial and occlusal reductions, 6-10 degrees of axial wall taper, marginal integrity and surface smoothness. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results as either acceptable or unacceptable.

Results: The majority of the students showed unacceptable occlusal reduction (89.6%). For axial reduction, the majority of students showed unacceptable results, recorded in 99.5% and 98.6% on the mesial and distal sides, respectively. Unacceptable facial and lingual reductions were noted in 93.7% and 77.4%, respectively. The taper angle on the mesial and distal sides was acceptable in 53.8% and 57.5%, respectively. About 56.6% of the dental students demonstrated acceptable marginal placement during preparation. Moreover, satisfactory finishing and rounded angles of the preparation were done by 68.3% and 58.4% of the students, respectively.

Conclusion: The results revealed that most students achieved unsatisfactory results. This study underscores the importance of continuous assessment and tailored teaching strategies to enhance the quality of tooth preparation during pre-clinical training.

牙科本科学生临床前预备牙的技术素质。
背景:牙齿准备是牙科的一项基本技术技能,要求准确性,对细节的仔细关注,以及对牙齿解剖的全面了解。临床前训练可以让牙科学生在对真正的病人进行治疗之前培养和提高这些能力。本研究旨在评估牙科学生在临床前培训中进行的牙齿准备的质量。方法:采用临床预科四年级学生共221颗假牙,在模拟牙环境下(男111,女110)进行全轮廓陶瓷冠的模拟牙准备。在牙齿准备过程中,下颌模型被安装在模拟头上。使用标准化标准评估牙齿准备,包括1.5-2 mm舌部、面部、轴向和咬合减少,6-10度轴向壁锥度,边缘完整性和表面光滑度。描述性统计用于总结可接受或不可接受的结果。结果:绝大多数学生(89.6%)出现不可接受的咬合降低。对于轴向复位,大多数学生表现出不可接受的结果,分别在中侧和远侧记录了99.5%和98.6%。面部和舌部不能接受的缩小分别为93.7%和77.4%。中、远侧锥度可接受的分别为53.8%和57.5%。约56.6%的牙科学生在准备过程中表现出可接受的边缘位置。68.3%的学生对整理满意,58.4%的学生对整理角度满意。结论:结果显示,大部分学生成绩不理想。本研究强调了持续评估和量身定制的教学策略在临床前培训中提高牙齿准备质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信