Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Marcos C Borges, McKenzie M Kennedy, Charles W Kropf, Matthew D Caldwell, Robert D Huang, Grace J Kim, David T Hughes, Larry D Gruppen, Deborah M Rooney
{"title":"Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.","authors":"Marcos C Borges, McKenzie M Kennedy, Charles W Kropf, Matthew D Caldwell, Robert D Huang, Grace J Kim, David T Hughes, Larry D Gruppen, Deborah M Rooney","doi":"10.1177/23821205251336279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several challenges regarding Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) processes have been previously reported. Few studies have addressed the cost of assessment in healthcare professional education. This study aimed to assess the time spent on and the cost of CCC processes, and faculty perception of the Milestones assessment in three residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed CCC faculty members to capture time devoted to, and satisfaction with, CCC processes from three residency programs at the University of Michigan: Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery. During preparatory periods before CCC meetings, administrative staff used daily logs to record time spent in the CCC preparatory period to develop meeting documents and resident reports. CCC faculty members supplied estimated time spent preparing residents' assessments through a survey administered the day following the meeting. Additionally, the duration of each CCC meeting was recorded, and salaries were confirmed to estimate total cost. Total faculty and staff time was summed and reviewed by each departmental CCC program director.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCC members found the unstandardized semi-annual report compiled by the programs was poorly organized, not easy to review, and did not provide high-quality information for setting Milestones. The majority of CCC members reported the current CCC process does not allow enough time for review of resident data, does not provide valuable feedback to inform resident progression, and does not provide adequate rigor to defend CCC decisions. Annually, administrative staff spent 162.9 ± 151.7 h preparing the reports. Faculty spent 147.0 ± 78.4 h for the resident assessment preparation and 97.3 ± 24.1 h in CCCs meeting. Based on salaries, the cost of CCC processes for Milestone assessment totaled USD83,437, with USD22,776, USD31,764, and USD28,897 for Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery, respectively. With an average of USD395.44 per resident, the total annual CCC cost for University of Michigan Medical was extrapolated to be USD404,531.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though Milestones were implemented more than ten years ago, CCC processes are still unsatisfactory to faculty and pose a significant institutional cost. Alternative approaches are still needed to improve resident competency assessment processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251336279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251336279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several challenges regarding Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) processes have been previously reported. Few studies have addressed the cost of assessment in healthcare professional education. This study aimed to assess the time spent on and the cost of CCC processes, and faculty perception of the Milestones assessment in three residency programs.

Methods: We surveyed CCC faculty members to capture time devoted to, and satisfaction with, CCC processes from three residency programs at the University of Michigan: Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery. During preparatory periods before CCC meetings, administrative staff used daily logs to record time spent in the CCC preparatory period to develop meeting documents and resident reports. CCC faculty members supplied estimated time spent preparing residents' assessments through a survey administered the day following the meeting. Additionally, the duration of each CCC meeting was recorded, and salaries were confirmed to estimate total cost. Total faculty and staff time was summed and reviewed by each departmental CCC program director.

Results: CCC members found the unstandardized semi-annual report compiled by the programs was poorly organized, not easy to review, and did not provide high-quality information for setting Milestones. The majority of CCC members reported the current CCC process does not allow enough time for review of resident data, does not provide valuable feedback to inform resident progression, and does not provide adequate rigor to defend CCC decisions. Annually, administrative staff spent 162.9 ± 151.7 h preparing the reports. Faculty spent 147.0 ± 78.4 h for the resident assessment preparation and 97.3 ± 24.1 h in CCCs meeting. Based on salaries, the cost of CCC processes for Milestone assessment totaled USD83,437, with USD22,776, USD31,764, and USD28,897 for Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery, respectively. With an average of USD395.44 per resident, the total annual CCC cost for University of Michigan Medical was extrapolated to be USD404,531.

Conclusions: Though Milestones were implemented more than ten years ago, CCC processes are still unsatisfactory to faculty and pose a significant institutional cost. Alternative approaches are still needed to improve resident competency assessment processes.

临床能力委员会和里程碑评估的成本和挑战。
背景:关于临床能力委员会(CCC)过程的几个挑战之前已经报道过。很少有研究涉及医疗保健专业教育评估的成本。本研究旨在评估三个住院医师项目中CCC流程所花费的时间和成本,以及教师对里程碑评估的看法。方法:我们调查了密歇根大学三个住院医师项目(麻醉学、急诊医学和外科)的CCC教师,以了解他们对CCC流程的投入时间和满意度。在协调委员会会议筹备期间,行政工作人员使用每日日志记录在协调委员会筹备期间为编制会议文件和驻地报告所花费的时间。在会议第二天进行的一项调查中,CCC的教师们提供了准备住院医师评估所花费的估计时间。此外,还记录了CCC每次会议的持续时间,并确认了薪金以估计总费用。教职员工的总时间由各部门CCC项目主任进行总结和审查。结果:CCC成员发现项目编制的未标准化的半年度报告组织不良,不容易审查,并且没有为设定里程碑提供高质量的信息。大多数CCC成员报告说,目前的CCC程序没有足够的时间来审查居民数据,没有提供有价值的反馈来告知居民的进展,也没有提供足够的严谨性来捍卫CCC的决定。行政人员每年编制报告的时间为162.9±151.7小时。教职工准备住院医师评估用时147.0±78.4小时,CCCs会议用时97.3±24.1小时。按工资计算,里程碑评估的CCC流程成本总计为83,437美元,其中麻醉学、急诊医学和外科分别为22,776美元、31,764美元和28,897美元。根据每位居民平均395.44美元,密歇根大学医学院每年的CCC总费用推断为404,531美元。结论:尽管里程碑在十多年前就已经实施了,CCC过程仍然不能让教师满意,并且造成了巨大的制度成本。仍然需要替代方法来改进住院医师能力评估过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信