The Influence of Implant Macro-geometry in Primary Stability in Low-Density Bone: An in vitro Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fakhrana Ariani Ayub, Sunarso Sunarso, Ratna Sari Dewi
{"title":"The Influence of Implant Macro-geometry in Primary Stability in Low-Density Bone: An <i>in vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Fakhrana Ariani Ayub, Sunarso Sunarso, Ratna Sari Dewi","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_155_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the primary stability of implants featuring various geometries in polyurethane bone blocks simulating low-density bone types 3 and 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 36 implants divided into three groups (Straumann BLT, <i>n</i> = 12; Zimmer TSV, <i>n</i> = 12; and Dentium Superline [DSL], <i>n</i> = 12). Implants featuring three different thread designs, a tapered body, a diameter of 4.0-4.1 mm, and a length of 10 mm were inserted into polyurethane bone blocks (20 and 15 PCF) to simulate bone types 3 and 4. Primary stability was evaluated using implant stability quotient (ISQ), insertion torque (IT), and removal torque (RT). IT and RT were compared using ANOVA, while ISQ was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A <i>P</i> value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For bone type 3, the highest IT (30.21 ± 1.38 N cm) and RT (23.25 ± 2.30 N cm) value were observed for the Zimmer TSV, and the highest ISQ values (63.29 ± 0.54 N cm) were observed for DSL. For bone type 4, the highest IT (18.07 ± 1,71 Ncm) and RT (14.48 ± 1.81 Ncm) values were observed for the Zimmer TSV, and the highest ISQ values (58.46 ± 0.78 N cm) were observed for the DSL. The ISQ, IT, and RT values of the implant groups were significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implant geometry and bone density were key factors influencing primary stability in this study. The outcomes of the present study may help clinicians make decisions, especially when dealing with bone that has a less favorable quality. These findings may have important clinical implications related to immediate or early loading protocols, highlighting the critical role of implant design in attaining sufficient stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"15 2","pages":"134-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_155_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed the primary stability of implants featuring various geometries in polyurethane bone blocks simulating low-density bone types 3 and 4.

Methods: The study included 36 implants divided into three groups (Straumann BLT, n = 12; Zimmer TSV, n = 12; and Dentium Superline [DSL], n = 12). Implants featuring three different thread designs, a tapered body, a diameter of 4.0-4.1 mm, and a length of 10 mm were inserted into polyurethane bone blocks (20 and 15 PCF) to simulate bone types 3 and 4. Primary stability was evaluated using implant stability quotient (ISQ), insertion torque (IT), and removal torque (RT). IT and RT were compared using ANOVA, while ISQ was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: For bone type 3, the highest IT (30.21 ± 1.38 N cm) and RT (23.25 ± 2.30 N cm) value were observed for the Zimmer TSV, and the highest ISQ values (63.29 ± 0.54 N cm) were observed for DSL. For bone type 4, the highest IT (18.07 ± 1,71 Ncm) and RT (14.48 ± 1.81 Ncm) values were observed for the Zimmer TSV, and the highest ISQ values (58.46 ± 0.78 N cm) were observed for the DSL. The ISQ, IT, and RT values of the implant groups were significantly different (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Implant geometry and bone density were key factors influencing primary stability in this study. The outcomes of the present study may help clinicians make decisions, especially when dealing with bone that has a less favorable quality. These findings may have important clinical implications related to immediate or early loading protocols, highlighting the critical role of implant design in attaining sufficient stability.

种植体宏观几何形状对低密度骨初级稳定性影响的体外研究。
目的:本研究评估不同几何形状聚氨酯骨块模拟低密度3型和4型骨的初级稳定性。方法:36个种植体分为三组(Straumann BLT, n = 12;Zimmer TSV, n = 12;和Dentium Superline [DSL], n = 12)。植入物具有三种不同的螺纹设计,锥形体,直径4.0-4.1 mm,长度为10 mm,插入聚氨酯骨块(20和15 PCF)以模拟骨类型3和4。通过植入物稳定商(ISQ)、插入扭矩(IT)和移除扭矩(RT)评估初级稳定性。IT和RT采用方差分析比较,ISQ采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析。P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:对于3型骨,Zimmer TSV的IT值最高(30.21±1.38 N cm), RT值最高(23.25±2.30 N cm), DSL的ISQ值最高(63.29±0.54 N cm)。对于4型骨,Zimmer TSV的IT值(18.07±1.71 Ncm)和RT值(14.48±1.81 Ncm)最高,DSL的ISQ值(58.46±0.78 Ncm)最高。种植体组间ISQ、IT、RT值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:种植体的几何形状和骨密度是影响本研究初期稳定性的关键因素。本研究的结果可以帮助临床医生做出决定,特别是在处理质量较差的骨骼时。这些发现可能对即刻或早期加载方案具有重要的临床意义,突出了种植体设计在获得足够稳定性方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信