Evaluation of Sterility of Saline Formulations Manufactured for Wound Care in Veterinary Practice.

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Madyson Marcolina, Zoë J Williams, Dean Hendrickson, Lynn M Pezzanite
{"title":"Evaluation of Sterility of Saline Formulations Manufactured for Wound Care in Veterinary Practice.","authors":"Madyson Marcolina, Zoë J Williams, Dean Hendrickson, Lynn M Pezzanite","doi":"10.3390/vetsci12050431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discontinuation of commercially available saline and hypertonic saline wound dressings for the veterinary market has restricted options available to veterinary practitioners treating contaminated and infected wounds. Clinicians may manufacture their own homemade solutions in clinics or field settings to treat equine or livestock species; however, information is limited on whether autoclave sterilization is necessary or sufficient to eliminate bacterial growth in isotonic and concentrated salt solutions and how long they may subsequently be stored prior to use. The purpose of this study was to assess sterility of saline (0.9%) and hypertonic saline (20%) solutions manufactured three ways (1-autoclaved glass bottle that was autoclaved again following solution preparation; 2-autoclaved glass bottle, not autoclaved again following preparation; 3-non-autoclaved plastic bottle, not autoclaved following preparation). Solutions were stored two different ways (1-solution in sealed bottle or 2-soaked gauze in vacuum-sealed plastic packets). Products were assessed for bacterial growth at four time points (baseline, one week, one month, six months). At each time point, samples of each solution were plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates and assessed for bacterial growth at 24 h. Vacuum-sealed soaked gauze was placed in antibiotic-free growth media for 24 h, and then media were plated on LB agar plates and assessed for bacterial growth at 24 h. If bacterial growth was detected, qualitative culture with sensitivity was performed to identify bacterial isolates. No bacterial growth was detected in stored solutions for any preparation method, concentration or time point assessed. Bacterial growth was detected from 0.9% saline-soaked gauze at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months in all container types for at least one time point. Bacterial culture revealed <i>Ralstonia</i>, <i>Bacillus</i>, <i>Sphingomonas</i> and <i>Staphylococcus</i> species. Environmental controls (water, containers, salt, biosafety cabinet and benchtop) were submitted for culture to identify the source of contamination, yielding light mixed growth from tap water and no growth from any other locations. These findings provide clinicians with practical information to guide preparation and storage of homemade saline-based products for wound care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12050431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discontinuation of commercially available saline and hypertonic saline wound dressings for the veterinary market has restricted options available to veterinary practitioners treating contaminated and infected wounds. Clinicians may manufacture their own homemade solutions in clinics or field settings to treat equine or livestock species; however, information is limited on whether autoclave sterilization is necessary or sufficient to eliminate bacterial growth in isotonic and concentrated salt solutions and how long they may subsequently be stored prior to use. The purpose of this study was to assess sterility of saline (0.9%) and hypertonic saline (20%) solutions manufactured three ways (1-autoclaved glass bottle that was autoclaved again following solution preparation; 2-autoclaved glass bottle, not autoclaved again following preparation; 3-non-autoclaved plastic bottle, not autoclaved following preparation). Solutions were stored two different ways (1-solution in sealed bottle or 2-soaked gauze in vacuum-sealed plastic packets). Products were assessed for bacterial growth at four time points (baseline, one week, one month, six months). At each time point, samples of each solution were plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates and assessed for bacterial growth at 24 h. Vacuum-sealed soaked gauze was placed in antibiotic-free growth media for 24 h, and then media were plated on LB agar plates and assessed for bacterial growth at 24 h. If bacterial growth was detected, qualitative culture with sensitivity was performed to identify bacterial isolates. No bacterial growth was detected in stored solutions for any preparation method, concentration or time point assessed. Bacterial growth was detected from 0.9% saline-soaked gauze at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months in all container types for at least one time point. Bacterial culture revealed Ralstonia, Bacillus, Sphingomonas and Staphylococcus species. Environmental controls (water, containers, salt, biosafety cabinet and benchtop) were submitted for culture to identify the source of contamination, yielding light mixed growth from tap water and no growth from any other locations. These findings provide clinicians with practical information to guide preparation and storage of homemade saline-based products for wound care.

兽医伤口护理用生理盐水制剂无菌性评价。
市售生理盐水和高渗生理盐水伤口敷料在兽医市场上的停止使用限制了兽医从业者治疗污染和感染伤口的选择。临床医生可以在诊所或现场制造自己的自制溶液来治疗马或牲畜;然而,关于高压灭菌器灭菌是否必要或足以消除等渗和浓盐溶液中的细菌生长,以及它们在使用前可以储存多长时间,信息有限。本研究的目的是评估三种方法制备的生理盐水(0.9%)和高渗盐水(20%)溶液的无菌性(1 .高压灭菌的玻璃瓶,溶液制备后再次进行高压灭菌;2 .已高压灭菌的玻璃瓶,制备后不要再进行高压灭菌;3 .非蒸压塑料瓶,制备后不蒸压)。溶液以两种不同的方式保存(1溶液密封瓶或2浸泡纱布真空密封塑料包装)。在四个时间点(基线、一周、一个月、六个月)评估产品的细菌生长情况。在每个时间点,将每种溶液的样品镀于Luria-Bertani (LB)琼脂板上,并在24小时内评估细菌的生长情况。将真空密封的浸渍纱布置于无抗生素的生长培养基中24小时,然后将培养基镀于LB琼脂板上,并在24小时内评估细菌的生长情况。如果检测到细菌的生长,则进行敏感的定性培养,以鉴定分离的细菌。在任何制备方法、浓度或评估时间点的储存溶液中均未检测到细菌生长。在所有容器类型中,0.9%盐水浸泡纱布在1周、1个月和6个月至少有一个时间点检测到细菌生长。细菌培养检出拉氏菌、芽孢杆菌、鞘氨单胞菌和葡萄球菌。环境控制(水、容器、盐、生物安全柜和工作台)提交进行培养,以确定污染源,从自来水中产生轻度混合生长,而从任何其他地方都没有生长。这些发现为临床医生指导自制伤口护理盐基产品的制备和储存提供了实用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信