Fetal Hemoglobin in Preterm Infants After Resuscitation with Immediate Cord Clamping, Delayed Cord Clamping, or Cord Milking.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Carlo Dani, Giulia Remaschi, Matilde Ulivi, Niccolò Monti, Simone Pratesi
{"title":"Fetal Hemoglobin in Preterm Infants After Resuscitation with Immediate Cord Clamping, Delayed Cord Clamping, or Cord Milking.","authors":"Carlo Dani, Giulia Remaschi, Matilde Ulivi, Niccolò Monti, Simone Pratesi","doi":"10.3390/children12050627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) plays a beneficial role in the progressive adaptation to the postnatal oxygen-rich environment in preterm infants due to its peculiar properties. Our aim was to evaluate if preterm infants resuscitated with delayed cord clamping (DCC) or umbilical cord milking (UCM) might have higher and more durable HbF levels than infants resuscitated with immediate cord clamping (ICC). <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively studied 181 preterm infants born at <30 weeks of gestation, among whom 120 were resuscitated with ICC, 30 with DCC, and 31 with UCM. Mean values of HbF blood levels in the first postnatal week (HbF1st <sub>week</sub>); in the 14th, 21st, and 28th days of life (HbF<sub>14-21-28 DOL</sub>); and in the 31st, 34th, and 36th weeks of postmenstrual age (HbF<sub>31-34-36 weeks</sub>) were calculated. <b>Results:</b> We found that HbF1st <sub>week</sub> (15.3 ± 3.4 vs. 12.6 ± 3.5 g/dL, <i>p</i> < 0.001), HbF<sub>14-21-28 DOL</sub>, (9.3 ± 3.2 vs. 7.6 ± 3.6 g/dL, <i>p</i> = 0.018), and Hb<sub>-34-36 weeks</sub> (7.5 ± 3.6 vs. 5.7 ± 3.6 g/dL, <i>p</i> = 0.014) levels were higher in the UCM than in the ICC group. No differences of HbF levels were found between the DCC and ICC groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> UCM was associated with a persistent higher level of HbF than ICC. The effect of DCC was less marked as HbF level was higher than ICC only in the first week of life. UCM and DCC may help counteract the negative effects of blood sampling and transfusions on HbF levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) plays a beneficial role in the progressive adaptation to the postnatal oxygen-rich environment in preterm infants due to its peculiar properties. Our aim was to evaluate if preterm infants resuscitated with delayed cord clamping (DCC) or umbilical cord milking (UCM) might have higher and more durable HbF levels than infants resuscitated with immediate cord clamping (ICC). Methods: We retrospectively studied 181 preterm infants born at <30 weeks of gestation, among whom 120 were resuscitated with ICC, 30 with DCC, and 31 with UCM. Mean values of HbF blood levels in the first postnatal week (HbF1st week); in the 14th, 21st, and 28th days of life (HbF14-21-28 DOL); and in the 31st, 34th, and 36th weeks of postmenstrual age (HbF31-34-36 weeks) were calculated. Results: We found that HbF1st week (15.3 ± 3.4 vs. 12.6 ± 3.5 g/dL, p < 0.001), HbF14-21-28 DOL, (9.3 ± 3.2 vs. 7.6 ± 3.6 g/dL, p = 0.018), and Hb-34-36 weeks (7.5 ± 3.6 vs. 5.7 ± 3.6 g/dL, p = 0.014) levels were higher in the UCM than in the ICC group. No differences of HbF levels were found between the DCC and ICC groups. Conclusions: UCM was associated with a persistent higher level of HbF than ICC. The effect of DCC was less marked as HbF level was higher than ICC only in the first week of life. UCM and DCC may help counteract the negative effects of blood sampling and transfusions on HbF levels.

立即脐带夹紧、延迟脐带夹紧或脐带挤奶复苏后早产儿的胎儿血红蛋白。
背景:胎儿血红蛋白(HbF)由于其特殊的性质,在早产儿对出生后富氧环境的逐渐适应中起着有益的作用。我们的目的是评估延迟脐带夹紧(DCC)或脐带挤奶(UCM)复苏的早产儿是否比立即脐带夹紧(ICC)复苏的婴儿具有更高和更持久的HbF水平。方法:我们回顾性研究了181例周出生的早产儿;第14、21、28天(HbF14-21-28 DOL);计算经后31、34、36周(HbF31-34-36周)。结果:我们发现hbf1周(15.3±3.4比12.6±3.5 g/dL, p < 0.001)、HbF14-21-28 DOL(9.3±3.2比7.6±3.6 g/dL, p = 0.018)和Hb-34-36周(7.5±3.6比5.7±3.6 g/dL, p = 0.014)水平在UCM组高于ICC组。DCC组和ICC组之间HbF水平没有差异。结论:UCM与HbF水平持续高于ICC相关。DCC的影响不太明显,因为HbF水平仅在出生后第一周高于ICC。UCM和DCC可能有助于抵消血样和输血对HbF水平的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Children-Basel
Children-Basel PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1735
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries. The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信