Potential Physiological Factors Underlying Diagnostic Discrepancies between MRI-based Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Scores and dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry T-scores.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005406
Yaoyu Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Shuo Wang, Jinbo Zhao, Xing Chen, Hui Wang, Yonghao Tian, Xinyu Liu, Lianlei Wang
{"title":"Potential Physiological Factors Underlying Diagnostic Discrepancies between MRI-based Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Scores and dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry T-scores.","authors":"Yaoyu Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Shuo Wang, Jinbo Zhao, Xing Chen, Hui Wang, Yonghao Tian, Xinyu Liu, Lianlei Wang","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to: (1) identify physiological factors influencing cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) scores, and (2) elucidate the mechanistic basis for diagnostic discrepancies between C-VBQ scores and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in bone quality evaluation.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>C-VBQ scores have emerged as a novel indicator for evaluating cervical bone quality. However, the potential influencing factors of C-VBQ scores, and the reasons for diagnostic discrepancies between C-VBQ scores and DEXA methods, have not been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 264 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated from July 2017 to July 2024. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression were used to explore the associations between physiological factors and C-VBQ scores. The predictive performance of C-VBQ scores for bone quality was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic analysis. Bone quality was independently assessed using both T-scores and C-VBQ scores. Accordingly, participants were classified into four groups: Healthy Bone (HBG), Damaged Bone (DBG), T-Healthy but VBQ-Damaged (TH-VDG), and T-Damaged but VBQ-Healthy (TD-VHG). Intergroup differences in physiological indicators were analyzed by ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The C-VBQ score demonstrated a significant positive correlation with glycated albumin (GA) (r=0.425, P<0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (r=0.402, P<0.001), and conjugated bilirubin (CB) (r=0.366, P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that GA (β=0.095, P<0.001), HDL-C (β=0.669, P<0.001), and CB (β=0.141, P<0.001) were significant factors contributing to changing C-VBQ scores. The patients in TH-VDG had significantly higher levels of GA, HDL-C, and CB compared to HBG patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GA, HDL-C, and CB are positively correlated with C-VBQ scores, and these correlations are significantly stronger than those with T-scores. Based on C-VBQ scores, patients with higher levels of GA, HDL-C, and CB tend to be diagnosed with impaired bone quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Objective: This study aims to: (1) identify physiological factors influencing cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) scores, and (2) elucidate the mechanistic basis for diagnostic discrepancies between C-VBQ scores and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in bone quality evaluation.

Summary of background data: C-VBQ scores have emerged as a novel indicator for evaluating cervical bone quality. However, the potential influencing factors of C-VBQ scores, and the reasons for diagnostic discrepancies between C-VBQ scores and DEXA methods, have not been elucidated.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 264 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated from July 2017 to July 2024. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression were used to explore the associations between physiological factors and C-VBQ scores. The predictive performance of C-VBQ scores for bone quality was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic analysis. Bone quality was independently assessed using both T-scores and C-VBQ scores. Accordingly, participants were classified into four groups: Healthy Bone (HBG), Damaged Bone (DBG), T-Healthy but VBQ-Damaged (TH-VDG), and T-Damaged but VBQ-Healthy (TD-VHG). Intergroup differences in physiological indicators were analyzed by ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.

Results: The C-VBQ score demonstrated a significant positive correlation with glycated albumin (GA) (r=0.425, P<0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (r=0.402, P<0.001), and conjugated bilirubin (CB) (r=0.366, P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that GA (β=0.095, P<0.001), HDL-C (β=0.669, P<0.001), and CB (β=0.141, P<0.001) were significant factors contributing to changing C-VBQ scores. The patients in TH-VDG had significantly higher levels of GA, HDL-C, and CB compared to HBG patients.

Conclusions: GA, HDL-C, and CB are positively correlated with C-VBQ scores, and these correlations are significantly stronger than those with T-scores. Based on C-VBQ scores, patients with higher levels of GA, HDL-C, and CB tend to be diagnosed with impaired bone quality.

基于mri的颈椎骨质量评分与双能x线骨密度t评分诊断差异的潜在生理因素。
研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。目的:本研究旨在:(1)确定影响颈椎骨质量(C-VBQ)评分的生理因素;(2)阐明C-VBQ评分与双能x线骨密度仪(DEXA)在骨质量评价中的诊断差异的机制基础。背景资料总结:C-VBQ评分已成为评估颈椎骨质量的新指标。然而,C-VBQ评分的潜在影响因素,以及C-VBQ评分与DEXA方法诊断差异的原因尚未阐明。方法:对2017年7月至2024年7月接受治疗的264例脊髓型颈椎病患者进行回顾性分析。采用相关分析和多元线性回归探讨生理因素与C-VBQ评分的关系。通过受试者操作特征分析评估C-VBQ评分对骨质量的预测性能。采用t -评分和C-VBQ评分独立评估骨质量。因此,参与者被分为四组:健康骨(HBG),受损骨(DBG), t -健康但vbq损伤(TH-VDG)和t -损伤但vbq健康(TD-VHG)。生理指标组间差异分析采用方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。结果:C-VBQ评分与糖化白蛋白(glycated albumin, GA)呈显著正相关(r=0.425, p)。结论:GA、HDL-C、CB与C-VBQ评分呈正相关,且显著强于与t评分的相关性。根据C-VBQ评分,GA、HDL-C和CB水平较高的患者往往被诊断为骨质量受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信