Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Robotic Systems in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.3390/s25103238
Ishith Seth, Kaiyang Lim, Edmond Chang, Warren M Rozen, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng
{"title":"Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Robotic Systems in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ishith Seth, Kaiyang Lim, Edmond Chang, Warren M Rozen, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng","doi":"10.3390/s25103238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Robotic surgical systems offer enhanced precision, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and visualization, making them highly suitable for the complex anatomical demands of plastic and reconstructive surgery. While widely implemented in other specialties, their integration in plastic surgery remains limited. This systematic review evaluates the clinical applications, outcomes, and limitations of robotic-assisted techniques in plastic and reconstructive procedures. <b>Methods</b>: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1980 and March 2025. Clinical studies reporting robotic applications in plastic surgery were included, while cadaveric, animal, and non-English studies were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using Covidence and validated tools including the CARE checklist, NOS, GRADE, and SYRCLE. A total of 1428 studies were screened, and 31 met the inclusion criteria. <b>Results</b>: Robotic systems were primarily applied in microsurgery (<i>n = 16</i>), breast reconstruction (<i>n = 8</i>), and craniofacial/aesthetic surgery (<i>n = 7</i>). Common platforms included the Symani Surgical System, Da Vinci systems, and ARTAS. Robotic-assisted approaches improved precision, aesthetic outcomes, flap survival, and patient satisfaction, particularly in procedures involving lymphaticovenous anastomosis and nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, challenges included steep learning curves, longer operative times, high equipment costs, and the lack of haptic feedback. Quality assessment rated all studies as moderate. <b>Conclusions</b>: Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates considerable potential in enhancing plastic and reconstructive outcomes. As systems become more compact, cost-effective, and integrated with AI and biomimetic technologies, their broader adoption is anticipated. Further high-quality studies are needed to optimize these systems and support widespread clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12115581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgical systems offer enhanced precision, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and visualization, making them highly suitable for the complex anatomical demands of plastic and reconstructive surgery. While widely implemented in other specialties, their integration in plastic surgery remains limited. This systematic review evaluates the clinical applications, outcomes, and limitations of robotic-assisted techniques in plastic and reconstructive procedures. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1980 and March 2025. Clinical studies reporting robotic applications in plastic surgery were included, while cadaveric, animal, and non-English studies were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using Covidence and validated tools including the CARE checklist, NOS, GRADE, and SYRCLE. A total of 1428 studies were screened, and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Results: Robotic systems were primarily applied in microsurgery (n = 16), breast reconstruction (n = 8), and craniofacial/aesthetic surgery (n = 7). Common platforms included the Symani Surgical System, Da Vinci systems, and ARTAS. Robotic-assisted approaches improved precision, aesthetic outcomes, flap survival, and patient satisfaction, particularly in procedures involving lymphaticovenous anastomosis and nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, challenges included steep learning curves, longer operative times, high equipment costs, and the lack of haptic feedback. Quality assessment rated all studies as moderate. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates considerable potential in enhancing plastic and reconstructive outcomes. As systems become more compact, cost-effective, and integrated with AI and biomimetic technologies, their broader adoption is anticipated. Further high-quality studies are needed to optimize these systems and support widespread clinical implementation.

评估机器人系统在整形和重建手术中的临床应用:系统综述。
背景:机器人手术系统提供了更高的精度,运动缩放,震颤过滤和可视化,使它们非常适合复杂的解剖需求的整形和重建手术。虽然在其他专业得到广泛应用,但在整形外科中的整合仍然有限。这篇系统的综述评估了机器人辅助技术在整形和重建手术中的临床应用、结果和局限性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science,检索1980年1月至2025年3月间发表的研究。报告机器人在整形手术中的应用的临床研究包括在内,而尸体、动物和非英语研究被排除在外。使用covid - ence和经过验证的工具(包括CARE检查表、NOS、GRADE和sycle)进行数据提取和质量评估。共筛选了1428项研究,其中31项符合纳入标准。结果:机器人系统主要应用于显微手术(n = 16)、乳房重建(n = 8)和颅面/美容手术(n = 7)。常用的平台包括Symani手术系统、Da Vinci系统和ARTAS。机器人辅助入路提高了手术精度、美学效果、皮瓣存活率和患者满意度,特别是在淋巴结吻合和保留乳头的乳房切除术中。然而,挑战包括陡峭的学习曲线,较长的操作时间,高设备成本,以及缺乏触觉反馈。质量评估将所有研究评为中等。结论:机器人辅助手术在提高整形和重建结果方面显示出相当大的潜力。随着系统变得更加紧凑、更具成本效益,并与人工智能和仿生技术相结合,预计它们将得到更广泛的应用。需要进一步的高质量研究来优化这些系统并支持广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信