Impact of chemical interventions on reducing dengue, Zika, and chikungunya: a systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Silvia Tortosa-La Osa, Sandra Roldán-Coronel, Eva Martín-Ruiz, Ángela Galán-Relaño, Antonio Olry de Labry-Lima
{"title":"Impact of chemical interventions on reducing dengue, Zika, and chikungunya: a systematic review.","authors":"Silvia Tortosa-La Osa, Sandra Roldán-Coronel, Eva Martín-Ruiz, Ángela Galán-Relaño, Antonio Olry de Labry-Lima","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2025.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given that vector control represents the primary strategy for preventing these diseases, the objective of this systematic review is to ascertain the efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing their burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for experimental studies published between 1987 and 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Medline, Embase, WOS-Core Collection, Scopus, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, and Biological Science Database were consulted to identify studies using incidence or prevalence as outcome variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2 232 references initially retrieved, 8 articles were included in the review. All studies used entomological indices along with disease burden indices to measure intervention impact. Three studies evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated curtains alone, one combined those with residual insecticide treatment in dwellings, one evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated school uniforms, and the remaining three evaluated household insecticide application. Only four of the eight articles showed some level of efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing dengue prevalence or incidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chemical interventions under examination did not result in a notable reduction in the burden of these diseases within the population, which would appear contradictory given the prominent role of chemical interventions in vector-borne disease control programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"49 ","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2025.51","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Given that vector control represents the primary strategy for preventing these diseases, the objective of this systematic review is to ascertain the efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing their burden.

Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for experimental studies published between 1987 and 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Medline, Embase, WOS-Core Collection, Scopus, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, and Biological Science Database were consulted to identify studies using incidence or prevalence as outcome variables of interest.

Results: Of the 2 232 references initially retrieved, 8 articles were included in the review. All studies used entomological indices along with disease burden indices to measure intervention impact. Three studies evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated curtains alone, one combined those with residual insecticide treatment in dwellings, one evaluated the use of insecticide-impregnated school uniforms, and the remaining three evaluated household insecticide application. Only four of the eight articles showed some level of efficacy of chemical interventions in reducing dengue prevalence or incidence.

Conclusion: The chemical interventions under examination did not result in a notable reduction in the burden of these diseases within the population, which would appear contradictory given the prominent role of chemical interventions in vector-borne disease control programs.

化学干预对减少登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热的影响:一项系统综述。
目的:鉴于病媒控制是预防这些疾病的主要策略,本系统综述的目的是确定化学干预措施在减轻其负担方面的功效。方法:按照PRISMA指南检索1987年至2024年间用英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语发表的实验研究。查阅Medline、Embase、WOS-Core Collection、Scopus、Lilacs、Cochrane Library和Biological Science Database,以确定将发病率或患病率作为感兴趣的结果变量的研究。结果:在最初检索到的2 232篇文献中,有8篇被纳入综述。所有研究均采用昆虫学指数和疾病负担指数来衡量干预效果。三项研究评估了单独使用浸过杀虫剂的窗帘的情况,一项研究将浸过杀虫剂的窗帘与住宅中的残留杀虫剂处理相结合,一项研究评估了浸过杀虫剂的校服的使用情况,其余三项研究评估了家庭杀虫剂的使用情况。8篇文章中只有4篇表明化学干预措施在降低登革热流行或发病率方面具有一定程度的功效。结论:所研究的化学干预措施并未导致人群中这些疾病负担的显着减少,考虑到化学干预措施在媒介传播疾病控制计划中的突出作用,这似乎是矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信