In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Posterior Adhesive Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques.

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE
Polymers Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.3390/polym17101340
Cem Peskersoy, Gozde Acar
{"title":"In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Posterior Adhesive Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques.","authors":"Cem Peskersoy, Gozde Acar","doi":"10.3390/polym17101340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the optical properties and mechanical durability of adhesive restorations fabricated using different techniques for the treatment of single-tooth loss in the posterior region after an aging process. Sixty extracted human teeth (thirty molars and thirty premolars) were restored using three different fabrication methods: 3D-printed resin restorations, fiber mesh-reinforced direct composite restorations, and indirect composite restorations. Color stability was assessed using a spectrophotometer, and fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Finite element stress analysis (FEA) was conducted to validate mechanical test results under simulated intraoral conditions. The fiber-reinforced composite group exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1057.91 MPa), while 3D-printed restorations showed the lowest (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Regarding color stability, the fiber-reinforced group demonstrated the highest ΔE<sup>00</sup> values (ΔE<sup>00</sup> = 1.71), differing significantly from the other groups, while the 3D-printed and indirect composite restorations showed no significant difference. Mechanical test results were consistent with FEA findings. These results indicate that fiber reinforcement enhances mechanical durability in high-load-bearing areas, while 3D-printed restorations may not yet be suitable for posterior regions. However, their potential use in anterior restorations, where occlusal forces are lower, warrants further investigation to improve material properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17101340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the optical properties and mechanical durability of adhesive restorations fabricated using different techniques for the treatment of single-tooth loss in the posterior region after an aging process. Sixty extracted human teeth (thirty molars and thirty premolars) were restored using three different fabrication methods: 3D-printed resin restorations, fiber mesh-reinforced direct composite restorations, and indirect composite restorations. Color stability was assessed using a spectrophotometer, and fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Finite element stress analysis (FEA) was conducted to validate mechanical test results under simulated intraoral conditions. The fiber-reinforced composite group exhibited the highest fracture resistance (1057.91 MPa), while 3D-printed restorations showed the lowest (p < 0.05). Regarding color stability, the fiber-reinforced group demonstrated the highest ΔE00 values (ΔE00 = 1.71), differing significantly from the other groups, while the 3D-printed and indirect composite restorations showed no significant difference. Mechanical test results were consistent with FEA findings. These results indicate that fiber reinforcement enhances mechanical durability in high-load-bearing areas, while 3D-printed restorations may not yet be suitable for posterior regions. However, their potential use in anterior restorations, where occlusal forces are lower, warrants further investigation to improve material properties.

三种不同工艺制备后牙黏合剂修复体力学性能的体外评价。
本研究评估了使用不同技术制作的粘接剂修复体的光学性能和机械耐久性,用于治疗老化后后牙区域的单牙缺失。60颗拔除的人牙(30颗磨牙和30颗前磨牙)采用三种不同的制造方法进行修复:3d打印树脂修复体、纤维网增强直接复合修复体和间接复合修复体。使用分光光度计评估颜色稳定性,使用万能试验机测量抗断裂性。采用有限元应力分析(FEA)对模拟口腔内条件下的力学试验结果进行验证。纤维增强复合材料修复体的抗断裂强度最高(1057.91 MPa), 3d打印修复体的抗断裂强度最低(p < 0.05)。在颜色稳定性方面,纤维增强组的ΔE00值最高(ΔE00 = 1.71),与其他组有显著差异,而3d打印和间接复合修复没有显著差异。力学试验结果与有限元分析结果一致。这些结果表明,纤维增强增强了高承重区域的机械耐久性,而3d打印修复体可能尚不适合后部区域。然而,它们在咬合力较低的前牙修复中的潜在应用,需要进一步研究以改善材料性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信